The Application of Data Science Techniques and Algorithms in Women’s Health Studies

Ikpe Justice Akpan, Obianuju Genevieve Aguolu
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.27.22273006

Abstract

Objective Evaluate and map data science methods employed to solve health conditions of women, examine the problems tackled and the effectiveness.

Research Method Text analytics, science mapping, and descriptive evaluation of data science methods utilized in women-related health research.

Findings (i). The trends in scholarships using data science methods indicate gaps between women and men relating to health burden and access to health. (ii). The coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) outbreak and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic tend to widen the identified health gaps, increasing the disease burden for women, while reducing access to health. There are noticeable additional health burdens on pregnant women and those with several health conditions (breast cancer, gynecologic oncology, cardiovascular disease, and more). (iii). Over 95% of studies using data science methods (artificial intelligence, machine learning, novel algorithms, predictive, big data, visual analytics, clinical decision support systems, or a combination of the methods) indicate significant effectiveness. (iv). Mapping of the scientific literature to authors, sources, and countries show an upward trend; 997 (16%), 113 (1.33%), and 57 (2.63%) per article, respectively. About 95% of research utilizing data science methods in women’s health studies occurred within the last four (4) years.

Conclusions The application of data science methods in tackling different health problems of women is effective and growing, and capable of easing the burden of health in women. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic tends to compound the health burden for women more than men. Policymakers must do more to improve access to health for women.

1. INTRODUCTION

The use of information systems, computer science methods, and operations research techniques to improve operations performance in the healthcare sector has a long history.1-5 Data science (DS) techniques and analytical methods are also employed to mitigate health disparities across social, cultural, and sex classification more recently.6,7 The goal is to eliminate the known gaps in healthcare access, reduce disease burden, and improve clinical outcomes and healthcare for all.8,9

The health gaps between men and women in terms of disease burden and access to health are well established in the social science and healthcare literature, including the ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19).122 Gaps are also reported during the ongoing coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic regarding disease burden and access to health. While the pandemic places an additional health burden on women than men, such as pregnant women and those with pre-existing breast cancer, gynecologic oncology, and other health conditions, fewer women (on average) have access to health compared to men. For example, in studies reported in this paper, pregnant women diagnosed with COVID-19 can have severe morbidities and have greater mortality risk. Simultaneously, child-care responsibility and economic burdens rests on working mothers during lockdowns and working from home rests more.45,74,100,103,122

The recent advances in computer processing power and the availability of massive and complex data comes the use of DS tools and methods and big data analytics techniques to conduct healthcare and biomedical sciences research and practice.10,11 The ongoing advances in DS and analytics methods include machine learning, deep learning, artificial intelligence, which in addition to visual analytics and information visualization, enhances knowledge discovery, sensemaking, understanding, and offering solutions to complex medical and health problems.11-15,108 Recent studies identify healthcare research and practice as one of the active fields utilizing data science technologies and methods to enhance clinical decision support systems and improving health outcomes.5,10,11,60 Therefore, this study undertakes an evaluation of the data science techniques and novel algorithms employed in women’s health studies. We also map specific approaches to the type of problems solved, identify what works and what does not, and identify areas that require more work.

2. THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

This section examines the peculiarity of women’s health and the disparity in terms of the burden and access to health.

2.1 Women’s Health

Certain diseases and conditions primarily affect women due to differences in their body anatomy and physiology. Some peculiar health conditions that impact women include breast health, obstetric and gynecological issues. Others are and biocompatibility issues related to implants used in women.17 Furthermore, several factors can influence the way women respond to common diseases and medical products. These factors include intrinsic (age, genetics, hormones, body size, sex-specific physiology, pregnancy), extrinsic factors (diet, sociocultural issues, environment).

Sex-specific biomarkers vary in females by age because of variations in hormone level, co-morbidities, and taking multiple medications. The toxicity of some medications can increase due to changes in a woman’s physiology during pregnancy. Also, certain medications can be contraindicated in women during lactation due to potential toxicity or teratogenicity to the growing fetus, limiting their therapy choices. Some common diseases that may affect women differently include osteoporosis, autoimmune diseases, certain cancers such as breast, uterine, cervical cancers, cardiovascular diseases, lung diseases, neurological diseases, and certain psychiatric conditions.

Osteoporosis is one of the common health problems experienced by older women due to their physiology. Women experience fluctuations in estrogen throughout life. Depletion of estrogen level causes osteoporosis, a risk factor for fractures, increased morbidity, and mortality. Moreover, this condition negatively impacts postmenopausal women’s physical, emotional, and mental well-being.18 Thus, it is essential to consider women’s risk factors when providing care or managing cases.

The disparity in Women’s healt is also prevalent in autoimmune diseases. Those conditions include autoimmune thyroid, multiple sclerosis, and rheumatological systemic autoimmune. Women also carry more disease burden on systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren’s syndrome effect, and rheumatoid arthritis, and represent most of these cases.8,19,45 The reasons for this imbalance are unclear but attributed to genetic (X-linked) and hormonal factors. Furthermore, the women’s health imbalance is present in the course and prognosis of the diseases. More studies are needed to investigate if this imbalance is due to differences in the disease’s biology, how men and women respond to therapy or the treatment.8,9,19,45

Estrogen has anti-inflammatory effects. The fall in estrogen levels as women age predisposes them to arthritis. Older women are more likely to get arthritis than men of the same age. They are also more likely to experience worse pain from it more than men. They are also more vulnerable to rheumatoid arthritis, a highly debilitating form of arthritis. Furthermore, arthritis tends to affect women’s limb joints more than men due to pregnancy changes and female anatomy.

In the United States, cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death among women. Most of these deaths are caused by coronary heart diseases and are usually sudden. Coronary heart diseases are responsible for 20% of female deaths. About 1 in 16 women aged 20 and older (6.2%) have coronary heart disease, the most common heart disease.20 Framingham’s study, pioneering research in the sex differences, demonstrated that women have greater primary risk factors for heart diseases than men.21 Furthermore, studies found that women are more likely to have worse outcomes from heart diseases. Possible factors related to worse effects in women include delays in seeking medical care or voluntary discharge. The reasons for these delays are unknown. More studies should be directed at understanding these risk factors and should be made available to the public, particularly women.

There are sex-specific disparities in the public health burden of cancers due to variations at the genetic/molecular level and sex hormones such as estrogen.22 The genetic and hormonal differences influence gene expressions of certain cancers, drug metabolism, and therefore the effect of chemotherapy. These differences should be considered in cancer research to avoid disparity of chemotherapy’s efficacy and toxicity between sexes. Women are more likely to experience psychiatric disorders, alcohol abuse, substance use disorders, conduct disorder, syndromal adulthood antisocial behavior without conduct disorder,23 tranquilizer abuse with social and specific phobias,24 and major depressive disorder and anxiety disorders compared to men.26 Females are more likely to experience the double stigma of being both alcoholic and morally degenerate. They are more likely to face societal stigmas at work, home, school, community. Furthermore, women with mental health disorders and drug addictions experience more stigma than men.25 The biological difference is attributed to the sex chromosomes. Awareness and understanding of the sexual dimorphism in neuropsychiatric disorders, increased risk of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in sex-linked genetic disorders can guide the management of these disorders.26

2.2 Disparities in Women’s Access to Healthcare

Previous studies have identified sex disparities in access to care.7,8,27 While health needs are significantly greater among older women than men of the same age, women have fewer economic resources.27 Even after controlling for health needs, there are still sex differences in preventive care and increased differences in hospital services. Women are less likely to have hospital stays or outpatient services28 than men with similar demographic and health profiles. Women are more likely than men to report insufficient money for medications, delays in care,29 insufficient money for health care, and insufficient money for mental health care. Studies show that while women often develop drug and alcohol addictions faster than men, they are likely to face multiple barriers to substance use treatment and are less likely to see treatment.25 They are more likely to have poorer treatment outcomes because of more inadequate resources. Some factors that may contribute to a delay in women seeking psychiatric care include hesitancy to discuss reasons they started using substances, difficulties or fears associated with leaving familial roles, stigma. They are five times more likely to have a history of sexual abuse.

3. MATERIALS AND METHOD

3.1 Research Objectives

This study seeks to achieve the following four objectives:

RO1. Identify and analyze the temporal trends of DS applications in women’s health research.

RO2. Map specific DS techniques/algorithms to women’s health conditions addressed, evaluate the effectiveness, identify what works or does not, and determine alternative methods.

RO3. Examine the relationship between the scientific literature (SL) and usage and the citation impacts.

3.2 Data Collection

The data used in this study came from published documents selected through a literature survey performed on the scientific database index of the “ISI Web of Science (WoS) core collection.” The search covers the period 2000 and 2020, which double as the effective trending era of DS and big data analytics.11 Our initial literature survey for this study occurred on February 22, 2021, with the final update on March 3, 2021. The complete search terms are as shown in Table 1. Limiting the search and selection of representative sample documents to the WoS was to ensure the quality of the publications included in this study and weeds out papers from unreliable sources.30 This is particularly important for a trending topic like DS/big data and visual analytics that attracts a diverse research interest.11,31 However, all the indexed articles on the WoS core collection addressing the topic of interest had an equal chance of being selected according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement.32 Also, articles indexed on the WoS make up about 84% of the scholarship indexed in MEDLINE and SCOPUS.31,33

View this table:
Table 1

Articles’ Search, Filtering, Screening and Selection Criteria of Articles

3.3 Filtering, Screening and Selection of the Scientific Literature

The unique 3,673 published articles retrieved from the Web of Science/Knowledge went through a thorough filtering and screening process based on the criteria in Table 1. Finally, the study included 150 screened published documents. The next steps involved extracting the relevant information in textual form and exported to Excel and an R-studio programming environment for science mapping, quantitative analysis, and descriptive narratives.

3.4 Science Mapping and Visualization of Scientific Literature Using R-Base Open-Source Software

The analysis involved different mapping of DS techniques to diverse women’s health problems employs big data analytics and result visualization.42,108 The study also analyzed the authors, countries, and regions where the study originates and the researchers’ international collaborations. This helps to establish global awareness and utilization of modern DS techniques to improve women’s health worldwide. We utilize an open-source bibliometric analysis package (Bibliometrix) embedded in the R programming Studio to achieve these goals.34 The data used for the analysis are text files extracted from the 150 as explained in the above section. Further details about the open-source Bibliometrix and Vosviewer packages utilized for visualization are available elsewhere.34,35 The approach is suited to a new field or subject, such as contemporary DS and visual analytics.11

4. RESULTS

The summary of the data extracted from the published documents (Table 2) were generated using the R-programming Studio as described in the earlier section. The 150 papers included in the study appear in 113 different sources, indicating a broad range of publication outlets in diverse fields of research and practice. Also, 83.3% are published in journals, while 12% appear in the conference proceedings, both making 95.3% of the publications. The document per author (0.15) and the collaboration index (6.70) indicates a high collaboration among authors, which is expected in a multidisciplinary field (health informatics).

View this table:
Table 2

Summary of the scientific literature production, authors, documents, and the citation impact

4.1 Temporal trends of Data Science (DS) Methods Application in Women’s Health Research

The analysis in this Section intends to achieve the first research objective (RO1) as defined in the previous section.

4.1.1 Annual Scientific Literature Production (SLP)

The SLP measures the development of a research field.36 The period 2000 to 2020 doubles as the emergence and growth of DS research and practice. The first article applying DS to solve Women’s health problems did not occur until 2006. The period 2006 to 2016 records just seven papers, while 143 SLP occurred from 2017-2020, indicating recent heightened interest (Figure 1). Studies using DS methods to solve women’s health make 26.6% during the period, while 73.4% relate to general health issues or problems relating to men (Table 1; Figure 1). The low document per author (0.15) – see Table 2, indicates fewer studies using DS techniques to address women’s health problems. Figure 1 shows a complete trend of the SLP during the period.

Figure 1:
Figure 1:

Annual scientific literature production on data science application in woman’s health

4.1.2 Collaboration Network and Contributions of Countries and Institutions in DS in Women’s Health Studies

It is essential to know the institutions and countries pioneering the studies addressed in this paper as a pointer to the current spread and promoting more involvement. The 997 authors/co-authors come from 55 countries, with most of the authors domiciled in the USA (Table 2). Over 43% (65 out 150) of the SLP originate from research institutions in the USA, followed by India and Canada (Figure 2), both as corresponding authors within the USA (MCP) and co-authors with outside country collaborators (SCP)11. Figure 2 presents the top 20 countries.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Countries Contributions of scientific literature and Collaborations (SCP: Corresponding Authors within the Country; MCP: Corresponding Authors Outside Country)

Regarding the contributing institutions, the most relevant and productive organizations originate from the USA (Figure 3), with the University of Washington, University of Pennsylvania, and Harvard Medical School, as the top three contributors. The nodes and the lines represent the contributions and connections, respectively.59 Figure 3 presents the complete lists of institutions from different countries.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Institutions/Organizations involved in producing the scientific literature on data science application in women’s health conditions.

4.2 Science Mapping and Evaluation of Data Science Methods in Solving Women’s Health Problems

The analysis in this Section intends to achieve the first research objective (RO2).

4.2.1 Science Mapping of Data Science Methods and Women’s Health Research, Authors, and Sources

Using an open-source bibliometric application embedded in R-Studio, we identify the top twenty-five (25) most frequent labels based on “authors’ keywords” as the unit of analysis.33,59 The authors’ keywords make up the central focus of any scientific literature (SL), as demonstrated by studies elsewhere.31,45,59 The result (Figure 4) shows machine learning as the most popular DS method used, while breast cancer, pregnancy issues, and other conditions, fall under gynecologic oncology.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Top 25 data science methods and women’s health problems mapped to the authors and sources.

The efforts indicate a strategic approach in using DS to address health conditions that place the most health burden on women.8,9 On the sources, IEEE Access, Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, JMIR publish most of the SLP on these subjects.

4.2.2 Network Analysis and Visualization of DS Methods in Women’s Health Studies

The results of network analysis using VOSVIWER, an open-source science mapping application, demonstrate the connections between the DS techniques, the diseases examined, and the inter-relationships among infections and illnesses. For example, “machine learning” is commonly used to study breast cancer and pregnancy-related problems. Similarly, the ongoing SARS-CoV-2 condition indicates a connection with COVID-19 and cardiovascular diseases (Figure 5). The science mapping utilizes the 493 synthesized authors’ keywords (Table 2) as the unit of analysis and presents the interconnections and interrelationship among the terms stratified into clusters and produces the visualization.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Visualization of the connections and inter-relationships among data science techniques and women’s health conditions.

4.2.3 An Evaluation of Data Science Methods in Solving Women Health Problems

The 150 documents evaluated in this study employed eight (8) related data science (DS) methods including artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and big data analytics (BDA). Others are predictive analytics (PA), novel algorithms (NA), clinical decision support systems (CDSS), and visual analytics (VA) (Table 3). The singular most frequently used data science method in solving women’s health problems is machine learning. Some studies use a combination of machine learning and novel algorithms, making it the most popularly used data science technique. Table 3 presents the complete results and descriptive analysis of the DS method and the problems tackled. These results echo the automatic mapping of the authors, keywords, and the sources (Figure 4/5) and network analysis that highlights the connections among the themes and topics using keywords as the unit if analysis (Figure 5).

View this table:
Table 3.

Data Science methods, problems tackled, and the application domain.

4.3 The Relationship Between the Scientific Literature (SL) and Usage and Citation Analysis

Here we examine the articles’ usage and citation impacts. The data from the selected 150 indexed documents on the WoS come in two streams, namely, U1 and U2 (Table 4).

View this table:
Table 4.

Usage and citation impact of the scientific literature on data science application in women’s health studies (U1, U2 = usage in the last 6 months, 7 years, respectively).

  • U1 (usage count within the past 180 days or last six months): 53 articles used 145 times.

  • U2 (usage count in the past 7 years, 2014-2020): 121 articles used 806 times.

The results (U1=35.3%, U1=81%), indicating active usage of the scientific literature during the period shown. The data does not distinguish specific users (researchers, health/industry practitioners, and others) or for what purposes. The frequency of the articles’ usage also increased astronomically in the most recent years (U1=98%, U1=91% used between 2017-2020), indicating an active research area.

Regarding the citation impact, the total basic citation count was 1078, an average of 7.18 per document. However, 49 papers (32.7%) are yet to receive any citations, while 68.3% gained at least one citation, ranging as follows (1-10: 53.3%; 11-65: 14%; >65: <1% citations). Table 4 presents the top 20 most cited documents and the focus of women’s health research.

5. DISCUSSION

This study evaluates the DS methods employed in solving diverse women’s problems, including machine learning, big data analytics, deep learning, and novel/existing algorithms. Other techniques used are clinical decision support systems and visual analytics/visualization. These techniques were very effective in tackling diverse women’s health problems. Significant and improved health outcomes occurred in predicting and managing breast cancer, gynecologic oncology, and pregnancy-related health challenges (pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, prediction of risks during pregnancy, and more). Other health challenges addressed include menstrual cycle, psychosocial stress, gestational diabetes, and vaginosis. Diseases that are not solely related to women, like Alzheimer’s, cardiovascular diseases, and even scabies, are also examined. Occupational health and the importance of women’s health records confidentiality, and utilization of health facilities, family planning, and the characterization of drug-drug interaction. Table 3 presents a detailed analysis.

The research employing DS involves data collection through primary and secondary sources (medical records, claims data, and questionnaire administration) involving large volumes and sometimes complex data structures. The studies involved diverse groups of women, including patients, college students, healthcare and other workers, pregnant women, women living in a specified neighborhood, and patient caregivers. The sample sizes also vary for the different studies. The most extensive cohort study involved identifying pregnancy episodes and outcomes using a claims database of about 4.9 million women and the smallest that investigated brain activation during food visualization and the changes in estradiol concentration among nine women.88,127

A significant breakthrough in women’s health using DS occurred in using big data and visual analytics to undertake studies in obstetrics and gynecology, which helps to reduce maternal mortality.11,128 The methods use personal information such as sex and genomic data to predict cancer.98 However, there are ongoing challenges and societal hurdles, as some women seem uncomfortable using big data to develop health risk prediction.129 We believe that formulating appropriate privacy policies using big secondary data can resolve these issues.

The study also identifies disparities between women and minority groups. For example, a sex gap was identified in the treatment of COVID-19 among hospital patients. Although 51% of patients with diagnosed COVID-19 cases were women, more men were treated than women. Chest X-ray and blood tests were performed less frequently in women (65.5% vs. 78.3% and 49.5% vs. 63.7%).102 Issues relating to access to health are common, including women of different groups. Healthcare utilization differed across groups of cervical cancer patients, and this revelation can help identify opportunities for early prevention.9 A study found wealth, social group, literacy, religion, and early age at marriage as social determinants of maternal health care utilization.92 Midlife women’s health and analysis of most women’s concerns involves worries about breast cancer and heart disease.95

6. CONCLUSION

This study focused on evaluating DS methods and algorithms to solve women’s health problems. The goals in evaluating the techniques used, maps the methods and issues, analyzing the effectiveness, identifying what works, and what else can help to mitigate the disparities regarding women’s health burden and access to health. This paper has achieved these goals, further determines the origin and growth of this area of study, and predicts future growth using simple linear trends and forecasting.

The science mapping of the scientific literature production on this subject indicates an upward trend. About 95% (143 out of 150) of research utilizing data science methods in women’s health studies occurred within the last four (4) years (2017 to 2020), while only 4.7% of the research happened between 2000 and 2016, indicating a new field. The potency of the data science methods and the improved outcomes that can help solve women’s health problems raises hope of reducing the health gap between men and women, especially regarding the disease burden. However, addressing access to health requires more than advances in computer technology and the deployment of information systems and methods. Policymakers need to play a critical role in reducing the overall gaps, especially access to health. Further, the ratio of the studies involving data science to solving women’s health issues is relatively low and requires greater participation. Ironically, while the data science techniques appear promising to address women’s health problems, but some women activists are unknowingly opposing the adoption, indicating the need for enlightenment regarding the usefulness of the identified techniques.

Data Availability

Not Applicable.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Bush M, Lederer AL, Li X, Palmisano J, Rao S. The alignment of information systems with organizational objectives and strategies in health care. International journal of medical informatics. 2009 Jul 1;78(7):446–56.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.
    Capan M, Khojandi A, Denton BT, Williams KD, Ayer T, Chhatwal J, Kurt M, Lobo JM, Roberts MS, Zaric G, Zhang S. From data to improved decisions: operations research in healthcare delivery. Medical Decision Making. 2017 Nov;37(8):849–59.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.
    Mutlag AA, Abd Ghani MK, Arunkumar NA, Mohammed MA, Mohd O. Enabling technologies for fog computing in healthcare IoT systems. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2019 Jan 1;90:62–78.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.
    Akpan IJ. An empirical study of the impacts of virtual reality on discrete-event simulation (Doctoral dissertation), University of Lancaster. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.440409
  5. 5.↵
    Günal MM, Pidd M. Discrete event simulation for performance modelling in health care: a review of the literature. Journal of Simulation. 2010 Mar;4(1):42–51.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Cook NL. Eliminating the sex and gender gap and transforming the cardiovascular health of all women. Ethnicity & disease. 2019;29(Suppl 1):65.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Wisdom JP, McGee MG, Horner-Johnson W, Michael YL, Adams E, Berlin M. Health disparities between women with and without disabilities: a review of the research. Social work in public health. 2010 Apr 28;25(3-4):368–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. 8.↵
    Sina BJ. Pregnancy and the global disease burden. Reproductive Health. 2017 Dec;14(3):5–8.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Pruitt SL, Werner CL, Borton EK, Sanders JM, Balasubramanian BA, Barnes A, Betts AC, Skinner CS, Tiro JA. Cervical cancer burden and opportunities for prevention in a safety-net healthcare system. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers. 2018 Dec 1;27(12):1398–406.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Haux R. Medical informatics: past, present, future. International journal of medical informatics, 2010; 79(9), 599–610.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    Akpan IJ, Akpan AA. Multiple criteria analysis of the popularity and growth of research and practice of visual analytics, and a forecast of the future trajectory. International Transactions in Operational Research. 2021; 1–24. DOI:10.1111/itor.12952.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. 12.
    Akoglu L, Tong H, Koutra D. Graph based anomaly detection and description: a survey. Data mining and knowledge discovery. 2015 May;29(3):626–88.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.
    Anbu S, Sarmah B. Machine learning approach for predicting womens health risk. In2017 4th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS) 2017 Jan 6 (pp. 1–4). IEEE.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.
    Abad A, Gerassis S, Saavedra Á, Giráldez E, García JF, Taboada J. A Bayesian assessment of occupational health surveillance in workers exposed to silica in the energy and construction industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019 Oct;26(29):29560–9.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Akpan IJ, Shanker M. The confirmed realities and myths about the benefits and costs of 3D visualization and virtual reality in discrete event modeling and simulation: A descriptive meta-analysis of evidence from research and practice. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2017 Oct 1;112:197–211.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.
    Aerts L, Rubin RS, Randazzo M, Goldstein SW, Goldstein I. Retrospective study of the prevalence and risk factors of clitoral adhesions: women’s health providers should routinely examine the glans clitoris. Sexual medicine. 2018 Jun 1;6(2):115–22.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    deKleijn M, Lagro-Janssen AL, Canelo I, Yano EM. Creating a roadmap for delivering gender-sensitive comprehensive care for women Veterans: results of a national expert panel. Medical Care. 2015 Apr;53(4 Suppl 1): S156.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Keen MU, Reddivari AK. Osteoporosis In Females. StatPearls [Internet]. 2020 Jun 23.
  19. 19.↵
    van Vollenhoven, R.F., 2009. Sex differences in rheumatoid arthritis: more than meets the eye… BMC medicine, 7(1), pp.1–4. DOI:10.1186/1741-7015-7-12
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Das SR, Delling FN. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019; 139(10): e56–28.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Ho KK, Pinsky JL, Kannel WB, Levy D. The epidemiology of heart failure: the Framingham Study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993; 22(4S1), A6–A13.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    Kim HI, Lim H, Moon A. Sex differences in cancer: epidemiology, genetics and therapy. Biomolecules & therapeutics. 2018 Jul;26(4):335.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. 23.↵
    Kessler RC, Crum RM, Warner LA, Nelson CB, Schulenberg J, Anthony JC. Lifetime co-occurrence of DSM-III-R alcohol abuse and dependence with other psychiatric disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey. Archives of general psychiatry. 1997; 54(4):313–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. 24.↵
    Conway KP, Compton W, Stinson FS, Grant BF. Lifetime comorbidity of DSM-IV mood and anxiety disorders and specific drug use disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 2006 Feb 15;67(2):247–57.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.↵
    Green CA. Gender and use of substance abuse treatment services. Alcohol Research & Health. 2006; 29(1):55.
    OpenUrlPubMedWeb of Science
  26. 26.↵
    Green T, Flash S, Reiss AL. Sex differences in psychiatric disorders: what we can learn from sex chromosome aneuploidies. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019; 44(1):9–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. 27.↵
    Cameron KA, Song J, Manheim LM, Dunlop DD. Gender disparities in health and healthcare use among older adults. Journal of women’s health. 2010 Sep 1;19(9):1643–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Weissman J, Russell D, Jay M, Malaspina D. Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in health care access and use among US adults with serious psychological distress. Psychiatric Services. 2018 May 1;69(5):517–22.
    OpenUrl
  29. 29.↵
    Ferraz-Torres M, Belzunegui-Otano T, Marín-Fernandez B, Martinez-Garcia Ó, Ibañez-Beroiz B. Differences in the treatment and evolution of acute coronary syndromes according to gender: what are the causes? Journal of clinical nursing. 2015 Sep;24(17-18):2468–77.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Jacso P. As we may search—comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current science, 2008; 89(9), 1537–1547.
    OpenUrl
  31. 31.↵
    Akpan IJ, Aguolu OG, Ezeume IC. Overcoming the challenge of communicating the concept and science of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 to non-experts. Challenge, 2021; 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2021.1912984.
  32. 32.↵
    Moher M, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151(4): 264–269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  33. 33.↵
    Akpan IJ. Scientometric evaluation and visual analytics of the scientific literature production on entrepreneurship, small business ventures, and innovation. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. 2020 Jul 8:1–29. DOI: 10.1080/08276331.2020.1786229.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. 34.↵
    Aria M, Cuccurullo C (2016) Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J Informetr 11:959–975.
    OpenUrl
  35. 35.↵
    Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping.” Scientometrics, 84 (2): 523–538. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  36. 36.
    Larivière V, Archambault É, Gingras Y. Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900–2004). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 2008 Jan 15;59(2):288–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  37. 37.
    Pinder LF, Nzayisenga JB, Shibemba A, Kusweje V, Chiboola H, Amuyunzu-Nyamongo M, Kapambwe S, Mwaba C, Lermontov P, Mumba C, Henry-Tillman R. Demonstration of an algorithm to overcome health system-related barriers to timely diagnosis of breast diseases in rural Zambia. PLoS One. 2018 May 10;13(5):e0196985.
    OpenUrl
  38. 38.
    Getahun D, Shi JM, Chandra M, Fassett MJ, Alexeeff S, Im T. M, & Raine-Bennett T. Identifying Ectopic Pregnancy in a Large Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Algorithm Validation. JMIR medical informatics, 2020; 8(11), e18559.
    OpenUrl
  39. 39.
    Vadavalli A, Subhashini R. An Improved Differential Privacy-Preserving Truth Discovery approach In Healthcare. In2019 IEEE 10th Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) 2019 Oct 17 (pp 1031–1037). IEEE.
  40. 40.
    López-Pineda A, Rodríguez-Moran MF, Álvarez-Aguilar C, Valle SM, Acosta-Rosales R, Bhatt AS, Sheth SN, Bustamante CD. Data mining of digitized health records in a resource-constrained setting reveals that timely immunophenotyping is associated with improved breast cancer outcomes. BMC cancer. 2018 Dec;18(1):1–0.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.
    Faubion SS, Larkin LC, Stuenkel CA, Bachmann GA, Chism LA, Kagan R, Kaunitz AM, Krychman ML, Parish SJ, Partridge AH, Pinkerton JV. Management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in women with or at high risk for breast cancer: consensus recommendations from The North American Menopause Society and The International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health. Menopause. 2018 Jun 1;25(6):596–608.
    OpenUrl
  42. 42.↵
    Gamirov R, Komarova L, Khasanov R, Gamirova R. Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer: Public Health and Mammographic Screening. BioNanoScience. 2018 Mar;8(1):407–11.
    OpenUrl
  43. 43.
    Akselrod-Ballin A, Chorev M, Shoshan Y, Spiro A, Hazan A, Melamed R, Barkan E, Herzel E, Naor S, Karavani E, Koren G. Predicting breast cancer by applying deep learning to linked health records and mammograms. Radiology. 2019 Aug;292(2):331–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. 44.
    Saijo Y, Ito Y, Yoshioka E, Sato Y, Minatoya M, Araki A, Miyashita C, Kishi R. Identifying a risk score for childhood obesity based on predictors identified in pregnant women and 1-year-old infants: An analysis of the data of the Hokkaido Study on Environment and Children’s Health. Clinical Pediatric Endocrinology. 2019;28(3):81–9.
    OpenUrl
  45. 45.↵
    Akpan IJ, Ezeume IC. The Challenges Faced by Parents and Children from Divorce. Challenge. 2020 Nov 1; 63(6):365–77. DOI:10.1080/05775132.2020.1842025.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. 46.
    Gomathi N, Srinivasulu P, Nikhil CV, Vineeth KV. Interactive Dashboard for The Betterment of Patient Health Using Big Data Analytics. RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL BIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES. 2016 Nov 1;7(6):1697–707.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.
    Zhang Y, Joly R, Hermann A, Pathak J. Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Records to Predict Postpartum Depression [38E]. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2020; 135, 59S–60S.
    OpenUrl
  48. 48.
    Ali AA, Xiao H, Tawk R, Campbell E, Semykina A, Montero AJ, Diaby V. Comparison of health utility weights among elderly patients receiving breast-conserving surgery plus hormonal therapy with or without radiotherapy. Current medical research and opinion. 2017 Feb 1;33(2):391–400.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.
    Anderson GL, Chlebowski RT, Aragaki AK, Kuller LH, Manson JE, Gass M, Bluhm E, Connelly S, Hubbell FA, Lane D, Martin L. Conjugated equine oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: extended follow-up of the Women’s Health Initiative randomised placebo-controlled trial. The lancet oncology. 2012 May 1;13(5):476–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  50. 50.
    Khan SU, Islam N, Jan Z, Din IU, Khan A, Faheem Y. An e-Health care services framework for the detection and classification of breast cancer in breast cytology images as an IoMT application. Future Generation Computer Systems. 2019 Sep 1;98:286–96.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.
    Sekar B, Lamy JB, Muro N, Pinedo AU, Seroussi B, Larburu N, Guézennec G, Bouaud J, Masero FG, Arrúe M, Wang H. Intelligent clinical decision support systems for patient-centered healthcare in breast cancer oncology. In2018 IEEE 20th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom) 2018 Sep 17 (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
  52. 52.
    Stark GF, Hart GR, Nartowt BJ, Deng J. Predicting breast cancer risk using personal health data and machine learning models. Plos one. 2019 Dec 27;14(12):e0226765.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. 53.
    Shiao SP, Grayson J, Lie A, Yu CH. Predictors of the healthy eating index and glycemic index in multi-ethnic colorectal cancer families. Nutrients. 2018 Jun;10(6):674.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.
    Pérez-Benito FJ, Signol F, Perez-Cortes JC, Pollán M, Pérez-Gómez B, Salas-Trejo D, Casals M, Martinez I, LLobet R. Global parenchymal texture features based on histograms of oriented gradients improve cancer development risk estimation from healthy breasts. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2019 Aug 1;177:123–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. 55.
    Griesel R, Stewart A, van der Plas H, Sikhondze W, Mendelson M, Maartens G. Prognostic indicators in the World Health Organization’s algorithm for seriously ill HIV-infected inpatients with suspected tuberculosis. AIDS research and therapy. 2018 Dec;15(1):1–9.
    OpenUrl
  56. 56.
    Wang S, Pathak J, Zhang Y. Using electronic health records and machine learning to predict postpartum depression. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2019;264:888–92.
    OpenUrl
  57. 57.
    Gao C, Osmundson S, Yan X, Edwards DV, et al. Learning to identify severe maternal morbidity from electronic health records. Studies in health technology and informatics. 2019 21;264:143.
    OpenUrl
  58. 58.
    Kumar S, Gupta Y, Mago V. Health-monitoring of pregnant women: Design requirements, and proposed reference architecture. In2019 16th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC) 2019 Jan 11 (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
  59. 59.↵
    Yan E, Ding Y. Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2012 63(7):1313–26.
    OpenUrlCrossRefWeb of Science
  60. 60.↵
    Akpan IJ, Brooks RJ. Experimental evaluation of user performance on two-dimensional and three-dimensional perspective displays in discrete-event simulation. Decision Support Systems. 2014 Aug 1; 64:14–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2014.04.002.
    OpenUrl
  61. 61.
    Dijaya R, Cholifah C, Djauharoh D, Nisak U, Syahminan S. Visual cohort baby recording based on internet of things for maternal and child health service. InJournal of Physics: Conference Series 2019 Dec 1 (Vol. 1402, No. 7, p. 077038). IOP Publishing.
    OpenUrl
  62. 62.
    Akbulut A, Ertugrul E, Topcu V. Fetal health status prediction based on maternal clinical history using machine learning techniques. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2018 1;163:87–100.
    OpenUrl
  63. 63.
    Pasha O, McClure EM, Saleem S, Tikmani SS, Lokangaka A, Tshefu A, Bose CL, Bauserman M, Mwenechanya M, Chomba E, Carlo WA. A prospective cause of death classification system for maternal deaths in low and middle-income countries: results from the Global Network Maternal Newborn Health Registry. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018 Aug;125(9):1137–43.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.
    Blotière PO, Weill A, Dalichampt M, Billionnet C, Mezzarobba M, Raguideau F, Dray-Spira R, Zureik M, Coste J, Alla F. Development of an algorithm to identify pregnancy episodes and related outcomes in health care claims databases: an application to antiepileptic drug use in 4.9 million pregnant women in France. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2018 Jul;27(7):763–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. 65.
    Ishikawa T, Obara T, Nishigori H, Miyakoda K, Inoue R, Hoshiai T, Saito M, Yaegashi N, Mano N. Development of algorithms to determine the onset of pregnancy and delivery date using health care administrative data in a university hospital in Japan. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2018 Jul;27(7):751–62.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.
    Hoffman SR, Vines AI, Halladay JR, Pfaff E, Schiff L, Westreich D, Sundaresan A, Johnson LS, Nicholson WK. Optimizing research in symptomatic uterine fibroids with development of a computable phenotype for use with electronic health records. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2018 Jun 1;218(6):610–e1.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.
    Taylor CL, Munk-Olsen T, Howard LM, Vigod SN. Schizophrenia around the time of pregnancy: leveraging population-based health data and electronic health record data to fill knowledge gaps. BJPsych open. 2020 Sep;6(5).
  68. 68.
    Epperson CN, Huang MY, Cook K, Gupta D, Chawla A, Greenberg PE, Eldar-Lissai A. Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with postpartum depression among commercially insured households. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2020 Oct 2;36(10):1707–16.
    OpenUrl
  69. 69.
    Wexler A, Davoudi A, Weissenbacher D, Choi R, O’Connor K, Cummings H, Gonzalez-Hernandez G. Pregnancy and health in the age of the internet: a content analysis of online “birth club” forums. PloS one. 2020 Apr 14;15(4):e0230947.
    OpenUrl
  70. 70.
    McClure EM, Garces A, Saleem S, Moore JL, Bose CL, Esamai F, Goudar SS, Chomba E, Mwenechanya M, Pasha O, Tshefu A. Global Network for Women’s and Children’s Health Research: probable causes of stillbirth in low-and middle-income countries using a prospectively defined classification system. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018 Jan;125(2):131–8.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.
    Moreira MW, Rodrigues JJ, Carvalho FH, Chilamkurti N, Al-Muhtadi J, Denisov V. Biomedical data analytics in mobile-health environments for high-risk pregnancy outcome prediction. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2019 Oct;10(10):4121–34.
    OpenUrl
  72. 72.
    Moreira MW, Rodrigues JJ, Kumar N, Al-Muhtadi J, Korotaev V. Nature-inspired algorithm for training multilayer perceptron networks in e-health environments for high-risk pregnancy care. Journal of medical systems. 2018 Mar;42(3):1–0.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.
    Monsen KA, Brandt JK, Brueshoff BL, Chi CL, Mathiason MA, Swenson SM, Thorson DR. Social determinants and health disparities associated with outcomes of women of childbearing age who receive public health nurse home visiting services. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):292–303.
    OpenUrl
  74. 74.↵
    Akpan, I. J., D. Soopramanien, and D. H. Kwak. 2020. “Cutting-Edge Technologies for Small Business and Innovation in the Era of COVID-19 Global Health Pandemic.” Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship: 1–11. doi:10.1080/08276331.2020.1799294.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  75. 75.
    Ackerman SJ, Knight T, Wahl PM, Cartwright CP. Health care utilization and costs following amplified versus non-amplified molecular probe testing for symptomatic patients with suspected vulvovaginitis: a US commercial payer population. ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research: CEOR. 2019;11:179.
    OpenUrl
  76. 76.
    Anukam KC, Osazuwa EO, Ahonkhai I, Reid G. Assessment of Lactobacillus species colonizing the vagina of apparently healthy Nigerian women, using PCR-DGGE and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2006 Oct;22(10):1055–60.
    OpenUrl
  77. 77.
    Anukam KC, Osazuwa EO, Ahonkhai I, Reid G. Lactobacillus vaginal microbiota of women attending a reproductive health care service in Benin city, Nigeria. Sexually transmitted diseases.2006;33(1):59–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  78. 78.
    Anthony MS, Armstrong MA, Getahun D, Scholes D, Gatz J, Schulze-Rath R, Postlethwaite D, Merchant M, Alabaster AL, Chillemi G, Raine-Bennett T. Identification and validation of uterine perforation, intrauterine device expulsion, and breastfeeding in four health care systems with electronic health records. Clinical epidemiology. 2019;11:635.
    OpenUrl
  79. 79.
    Rahman ML, Zhang C, Smarr MM, Lee S, Honda M, Kannan K, Tekola-Ayele F, Louis GM. Persistent organic pollutants and gestational diabetes: a multi-center prospective cohort study of healthy US women. Environment international. 2019 Mar 1;124:249–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  80. 80.
    Riedel BC, Daianu M, Ver Steeg G, Mezher A, Salminen LE, Galstyan A, Thompson PM, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Uncovering biologically coherent peripheral signatures of health and risk for Alzheimer’s disease in the aging brain. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2018 Nov 29;10:390.
    OpenUrl
  81. 81.
    Manuel DG, Tuna M, Bennett C, Hennessy D, et al. Development and validation of a cardiovascular disease risk-prediction model using population health surveys: the Cardiovascular Disease Population Risk Tool (CVDPoRT). Cmaj. 2018 Jul 23;190(29):E871–82.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. 82.
    Avram R, Tison G, Nah G, Howard BV, et al. Using Machine Learning Methods to Identify Predictors of Incident Myocardial Infarction in the Women’S Health Initiative Cohort. Circulation. 2018 6;138(Suppl_1): A15034–.
    OpenUrl
  83. 83.
    Perini W, Agyemang C, Snijder MB, Peters RJ, Kunst AE. Ethnic disparities in educational and occupational gradients of estimated cardiovascular disease risk: The Healthy Life in an Urban Setting study. Scandinavian journal of public health. 2018 Mar;46(2):204–13.
    OpenUrl
  84. 84.
    Sano A, Taylor S, McHill AW, Phillips AJ, et al. Identifying objective physiological markers and modifiable behaviors for self-reported stress and mental health status using wearable sensors and mobile phones: observational study. Journal of medical Internet research. 2018;20(6):e210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. 85.
    Clayton AH, Goldstein I, Kim NN, Althof SE, Faubion SS, Faught BM, Parish SJ, Simon JA, Vignozzi L, Christiansen K, Davis SR. The International Society for the Study of Women’s Sexual Health process of care for management of hypoactive sexual desire disorder in women. InMayo Clinic Proceedings 2018 Apr 1 (Vol. 93, No. 4, pp. 467–487). Elsevier.
    OpenUrl
  86. 86.
    Pienn M, Burgard C, Payer C, Avian A, Urschler M, Stollberger R, Olschewski A, Olschewski H, Johnson T, Meinel FG, Bálint Z. Healthy lung vessel morphology derived from thoracic computed tomography. Frontiers in physiology. 2018 Apr 10;9:346.
    OpenUrl
  87. 87.
    Wadensten T, Nystrom E, Franzen K, Stenzelius K, Malmberg L, Samuelsson E. Development and Use of an algorithm For Identifying Women With Urgency Or Mixed Urinary Incontinence Suitable For E-Health Treatment. Neurourology and Urodynamics; S5. 2018;37.
    OpenUrl
  88. 88.↵
    Alonso-Alonso M, Ziemke F, Magkos F, Barrios FA, Brinkoetter M, Boyd I, Rifkin-Graboi A, Yannakoulia M, Rojas R, Pascual-Leone A, Mantzoros CS. Brain responses to food images during the early and late follicular phase of the menstrual cycle in healthy young women: relation to fasting and feeding. The American journal of clinical nutrition. 2011 Aug 1;94(2):377–84.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  89. 89.
    Angeli A, Lainé F, Lavenu A, Ropert M, Lacut K, Gissot V, Sacher-Huvelin S, Jezequel C, Moignet A, Laviolle B, Comets E. Joint model of iron and hepcidin during the menstrual cycle in healthy women. The AAPS journal. 2016 Mar;18(2):490–504.
    OpenUrl
  90. 90.
    Gerassis S, Abad A, Saavedra Á, García JF, Taboada J. Women’s Occupational Health: Improving Medical Protocols with Artificial Intelligence Solutions. InProceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference 2018 Sep 6 (pp. 1193–1199). Springer, Cham.
  91. 91.
    Brennan-Olsen SL, Solovieva S, Viikari-Juntura E, Ackerman IN, Bowe SJ, et al. Arthritis diagnosis and symptoms are positively associated with specific physical job exposures in lower-and middle-income countries: cross-sectional results from the World Health Organization’s Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). BMC public health. 2018 Dec;18(1):1–2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. 92.↵
    Dey A, Hay K, Afroz B, Chandurkar D, Singh K, Dehingia N, Raj A, Silverman JG. Understanding intersections of social determinants of maternal healthcare utilization in Uttar Pradesh, India. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0204810.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  93. 93.
    Progovac AM, Cook BL, Mullin BO, McDowell A, Sanchez R MJ, Wang Y, Creedon TB, Schuster MA. Identifying gender minority patients’ health and health care needs in administrative claims data. Health Affairs. 2018 Mar 1;37(3):413–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. 94.
    Jain A, Kanhangad V. Gender classification in smartphones using gait information. Expert Systems with Applications. 2018 Mar 1;93:257–66.
    OpenUrl
  95. 95.↵
    Lindenmeyer A, Griffiths F, Green E, Thompson D, Tsouroufli M. Family health narratives: Midlife women’s concepts of vulnerability to illness. Health:. 2008 Jul;12(3):275–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. 96.
    Lengwiler F, Rappoport D, Jaggi GP, Landau K, Traber GL. Reliability of Cyclotorsion measurements using Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy imaging in healthy subjects: the CySLO study. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2018 Apr 1;102(4):535–8.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  97. 97.
    Correia RB, de Araújo Kohler LP, Mattos MM, Rocha LM. City-wide electronic health records reveal gender and age biases in administration of known drug–drug interactions. NPJ Digital Medicine. 2019 Jul 23;2(1):1–3.
    OpenUrl
  98. 98.↵
    Kweon S, Lee JH, Lee Y, Park YR. Personal health information inference using machine learning on RNA expression data from patients with cancer: algorithm validation study. Journal of medical Internet research. 2020;22(8):e18387.
    OpenUrl
  99. 99.
    Lee JW, Lim HS, Kim DW, Shin SA, Kim J, Yoo B, Cho KH. The development and implementation of stroke risk prediction model in National Health Insurance Service’s personal health record. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2018 Jan 1;153:253–7.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  100. 100.↵
    Ashokka B, Loh MH, Tan CH, Su LL, Young BE, Lye DC, Biswas A, Illanes SE, Choolani M. Care of the pregnant woman with coronavirus disease 2019 in labor and delivery: anesthesia, emergency cesarean delivery, differential diagnosis in the acutely ill parturient, care of the newborn, and protection of the healthcare personnel. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2020 Jul 1;223(1):66–74.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  101. 101.
    Qiu H, Yu HY, Wang LY, Yao Q, et al. Electronic health record driven prediction for gestational diabetes mellitus in early pregnancy. Scientific reports. 2017 Nov 27;7(1):1–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  102. 102.↵
    Ancochea J, Izquierdo JL, Savana COVID-19 Research Group, Soriano JB. Evidence of gender differences in the diagnosis and management of coronavirus disease 2019 patients: An analysis of electronic health records using natural language processing and machine learning. Journal of Women’s Health. 2021 Mar 1;30(3):393–404.
    OpenUrl
  103. 103.↵
    Akpan IJ, Aguolu OG, Kobara YM, Razavi R, Akpan AA, Shanker M. Association Between What People Learned About COVID-19 Using Web Searches and Their Behavior Toward Public Health Guidelines: Empirical Infodemiology Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(9):e28975. 1-19. doi:10.2196/28975; PMID: 34280117.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. 104.
    Caballero FF, Soulis G, Engchuan W, Sánchez-Niubó A, Arndt H, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Haro JM, Chatterji S, Panagiotakos DB. Advanced analytical methodologies for measuring healthy ageing and its determinants, using factor analysis and machine learning techniques: the ATHLOS project. Scientific Reports. 2017 Mar 10;7(1):1–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  105. 105.
    Howell EA, Egorova NN, Janevic T, Balbierz MA, Zeitlin J, Hebert PL. Severe maternal morbidity among Hispanic women in New York City: investigation of health disparities. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2017; 129(2):285.
    OpenUrl
  106. 106.
    Mahunnah M, Taveter K. A scalable multi-agent architecture in environments with limited connectivity: Case study on individualised care for healthy pregnancy. In2013 7th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST) 2013 Jul 24 (pp. 84–89). IEEE.
  107. 107.
    Mailick MR, Movaghar A, Hong J, Greenberg JS, DaWalt LS, Zhou L, Jackson J, Rathouz PJ, Baker MW, Brilliant M, Page D. Health profiles of mosaic versus non-mosaic FMR1 premutation carrier mothers of children with fragile X syndrome. Frontiers in genetics. 2018 May 16;9:173.
    OpenUrl
  108. 108.↵
    Akpan IJ, Shanker M, Razavi R. Improving the success of simulation projects using 3D visualization and virtual reality. Journal of The Operational Research Society, 2020; 71(12), 1900–1926. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1641649.
    OpenUrl
  109. 109.
    Moreira MW, Rodrigues JJ, Marcondes GA, Neto AJ, Kumar N, Diez ID. A preterm birth risk prediction system for mobile health applications based on the support vector machine algorithm. In2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC) 2018 May 20 (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
  110. 110.
    Asri H, Mousannif H, Al Moatassime H. Big data analytics in healthcare: case study-miscarriage prediction. International Journal of Distributed Systems and Technologies (IJDST). 2019;10(4):45–58.
    OpenUrl
  111. 111.
    Baqui A, Ahmed P, Dasgupta SK, Begum N, Rahman M, Islam N, Quaiyum M, Kirkwood B, Edmond K, Shannon C, Newton S. Development and validation of a simplified algorithm for neonatal gestational age assessment–protocol for the Alliance for Maternal Newborn Health Improvement (AMANHI) prospective cohort study. Journal of global health. 2017 Dec;7(2).
  112. 112.
    Goin DE, Rudolph KE, Gomez AM, Ahern J. Mediation of Firearm Violence and Preterm Birth by Pregnancy Complications and Health Behaviors: Addressing Structural and Postexposure Confounding. American journal of epidemiology. 2020 Aug 1;189(8):820–31.
    OpenUrl
  113. 113.
    Krishnamurti T, Davis AL, Simhan HN. Worrying yourself sick? Association between pre-eclampsia onset and health-related worry in pregnancy. Pregnancy hypertension. 2019 Oct 1;18:55–7.
    OpenUrl
  114. 114.
    Tayal DK, Meena K, Kumar S. Analysis of various Data Mining Techniques Techniques for Pregnancy related issues and Postnatal health of infant using Machine Learning and Fuzzy Logic. In2018 3rd International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES) 2018; (789–793). IEEE.
  115. 115.
    de l’Aulnoit AH, Boudet S, Génin M, Gautier PF, Schiro J, de l’Aulnoit DH, Beuscart R. Development of a smart mobile data module for fetal monitoring in E-Healthcare. Journal of medical systems. 2018 May;42(5):1–7.
    OpenUrl
  116. 116.
    Lukkahatai N, Walitt B, Deandrés-Galiana EJ, Fernández-Martínez JL, Saligan LN. A predictive algorithm to identify genes that discriminate individuals with fibromyalgia syndrome diagnosis from healthy controls. Journal of pain research. 2018;11:2981.
    OpenUrl
  117. 117.
    Wiszniewska M, Magnuska J, Lipinska-Ojrzanowska A, Peplonska B, Hanke W, Kalinka J, Skret-Magierlo J, Zadrozny M, Walusiak-Skorupa J. The prophylactic operational model integrated with occupational healthcare-prophylactic of some types of cancers among women/model. Medycyna pracy. 2018 Jul 1;69(4):439–56.
    OpenUrl
  118. 118.
    Chubak J, Onega T, Zhu W, Buist DS, Hubbard RA. An electronic health record-based algorithm to ascertain the date of second breast cancer events. Medical care. 2017 Dec 1.
  119. 119.
    Rac MW, Revell PA, Eppes CS. Syphilis during pregnancy: a preventable threat to maternal-fetal health. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2017 Apr 1;216(4):352–63.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  120. 120.
    Khamparia A, Gupta D, de Albuquerque VH, Sangaiah AK, Jhaveri RH. Internet of health things-driven deep learning system for detection and classification of cervical cells using transfer learning. The Journal of Supercomputing. 2020 Jan 14:1–9.
  121. 121.
    Yu S, Lee JK, Kim JH, Park H, Lee MY, Ryu S, Kwon MJ, Woo HY. Diagnostic performance and establishment of reference limits of HE4 in Korean healthy women. Gynecologic oncology. 2016 1;143(1):128–34.
    OpenUrl
  122. 122.↵
    Akter S. The gender gap in COVID-19 mortality in the United States. Feminist Economics. 2020; 3:1–8.
    OpenUrl
  123. 123.
    Khan S, Khan A, Maqsood M, Aadil F, Ghazanfar MA. Optimized gabor feature extraction for mass classification using cuckoo search for big data e-healthcare. Journal of Grid Computing. 2019 Jun;17(2):239–54.
    OpenUrl
  124. 124.
    Lynch KE, won Chang J, Matheny ME, Goldfarb A, Efimova O, Coronado G, DuVall SL. Comparison of automated and retrospectively calculated estimated glomerular filtration rate in electronic health record data. BMC nephrology. 2018 Dec;19(1):1–0.
    OpenUrl
  125. 125.
    Haddad SM, Souza RT, Cecatti JG, Barreix M, Tamrat T, Footitt C, Mehl GL, Syah IF, Shankar AH, Tunçalp Ö. Building a Digital Tool for the Adoption of the World Health Organization’s Antenatal Care Recommendations: Methodological Intersection of Evidence, Clinical Logic, and Digital Technology. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(10):e16355.
    OpenUrl
  126. 126.
    Giardino DL, Huck-Iriart C, Riddick M, Garay A. The endless quarantine: The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on healthcare workers after three months of mandatory social isolation in Argentina. Sleep medicine. 2020 Dec 1;76:16–25.
    OpenUrl
  127. 127.↵
    Blotière PO, Weill A, Dalichampt M, Billionnet C, et al. Development of an algorithm to identify pregnancy episodes and related outcomes in health care claims databases: an application to antiepileptic drug use in 4.9 million pregnant women in France. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2018 Jul;27(7):763–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  128. 128.↵
    Macedonia CR, Johnson CT, Rajapakse I. Advanced Research and Data Methods in Women’s Health. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2017 Feb 1;129(2):249–64.
    OpenUrl
  129. 129.↵
    Shahbaz M, Gao C, Zhai L, Shahzad F, Arshad MR. Moderating effects of gender and resistance to change on the adoption of big data analytics in healthcare. Complexity. 2020 Jan 23;2020.
Back to top
Posted March 31, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email
The Application of Data Science Techniques and Algorithms in Women’s Health Studies
Ikpe Justice Akpan, Obianuju Genevieve Aguolu
medRxiv 2022.03.27.22273006; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.03.27.22273006
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools

Subject Area