ABSTRACT
Aim & Objectives The aim of the present study was to clinically and radiographically compare and evaluate the NIPSA (Non-Incised Papillae Surgical Approach) and EPP (Entire Papilla Preservation) techniques in the treatment of intra bony defects.
Patients and methods From this initial patient pool of 156 patients, 44 individuals satisfying the inclusion criteria were selected. One site in each subject was assigned into each of the following experimental groups which were treated with the relevant procedure; NIPSA and EPP groups. Clinical parameters included the recording of pocket probing depths (PPD), clinical attachment levels (CAL) and papilla loss. The evaluation of bone fill was performed at the end of 3 & 6-months by using Image J® software.
Results NIPSA and EPP resulted in highly significant CAL gains (4.00±1.00 vs 5.25 ± 1.47mm; p≤0.001) and PPD reductions (3.352±0.70 vs 3.625±1.024mm; p≤0.001) at 6-months post-surgery. From the start to the end of study period, NIPSA resulted in almost no papilla loss (1.71±0.47 to 1.73±0.77mm) while EPP technique showed minimal and insignificant (1.57±0.52 to 1.48±0.71mm; p≥0.05) papilla loss. The EPP group revealed a highly significant (0.459±0.16 vs 0.269±0.16cm2; p≤0.001) bone fill over NIPSA group at 6-months.
Conclusion From this trial conducted over a period of 6-months, NIPSA and EPP both resulted in significant improvements in clinical outcomes. NIPSA and EPP showed favourable outcomes in terms papilla loss and bone fill respectively. Both the techniques achieve the aims outlined earlier and broaden the choice available to a periodontist in the management of intrabony defects.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT04376450
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
44 individuals satisfying the inclusion criteria were selected with all the participants providing informed consent and the study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee (SVSIDS/PERIO/2/2018).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
All listed authors have participated in research and article preparation.
All authors report no conflict of interest and a form has been submitted to this effect. This is an institution-funded study (SVS Institute of Dental Sciences, Yedira Post, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India).
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
