Abstract
Background and objectives White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are frequent imaging features of small vessel disease (SVD) and related to poor clinical outcomes. WMH progression over time is well described, but regression was also noted recently, although the frequency and associated factors are unknown. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess longitudinal intra-individual WMH volume changes in sporadic SVD.
Methods Following PRISMA guidelines we searched EMBASE and MEDLINE for papers up to 28 January 2022 on WMH volume changes using MRI on ≥2 time-points in adults with sporadic SVD. We classified populations (healthy/community-dwelling, stroke, cognitive, other vascular risk factors, depression) based on study characteristics. We performed random-effects meta-analyses with Knapp-Hartung adjustment to determine mean WMH volume change (change in mL, % of intracranial volume [%ICV], or mL/year), 95%CI and prediction intervals (PI, limits of increase and decrease) using unadjusted data. Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomised Studies (RoBANS) was used to assess risk of bias.
Results Forty papers, 10,932 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Mean WMH volume increased over time by: 1.74 mL (95% CI 1.23, 2.26; PI -1.24, 4.73 mL; 27 papers, N=7411, mean time interval 2.7 years, SD=1.65); 0.25%ICV (95% CI 0.14, 0.36; PI -0.06, 0.56; 6 papers, N=1071, mean time interval 3.5 years, SD =1.54); or 0.61 mL/year (95% CI 0.37, 0.85; PI -0.25, 1.46; 7 papers, N=2450). Additionally, 13 papers specifically mentioned and/or provided data on WMH regression, which occurred in asymptomatic, stroke, and cognitive presentations of SVD.
Discussion Net mean WMH volume increases over time mask wide-ranging change (e.g. mean increase of 1¾mL ranging from 1¼mL decrease to 4¾ml increase), with regression documented explicitly in up to 1/3 of participants. More knowledge on underlying mechanisms, associated factors and clinical correlates is needed, as WMH regression could be an important intervention target.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
ACCJ was funded by the Alzheimer's Society (ref 486 (AS-CP-18b-001), University of Edinburgh College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine and the UK Dementia Research Institute which receives funding from UK DRI Ltd funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Alzheimer's Society and Alzheimer's Research UK. CA is funded by UK Dementia Research Institute as above, the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) and the Anne Rowling Regenerative Neurology Clinic. TR and MH were funded by the Wellcome Trust through the Translational Neurosciences PhD program. SMM was funded by Age UK. FND acknowledges support from The Stroke Association, Garfield Weston Foundation, NHS Research Scotland and the Agnes Parry Endowment at the University of Edinburgh. JMW acknowledges support from the Fondation Leducq Transatlantic Network of Excellence for the Study of Perivascular Spaces in Small Vessel Disease (16 CVD 05) and the UK Dementia Research Institute as above.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request
