Abstract
Objectives To explore the experiences of healthcare workers of providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support (NARS) to critically unwell patients with covid-19.
Design A qualitative study drawing on a social constructionist perspective using thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews.
Setting A single acute UK NHS Trust across two hospital sites.
Participants Multidisciplinary team members in acute, respiratory and palliative medicine.
Results 21 nurses, doctors (juniors and consultants) and physiotherapists described the provision of NARS to critically unwell covid-19 patients as extremely challenging. The main themes were of feeling ill prepared and unsupported, a need to balance complex moral actions, a sense of duty to patients and their families. The impact on staff was profound and findings are discussed via a lens of moral injury. Injurious events included staff feeling they had acted in a way that caused harm, failed to prevent harm or had been let down by seniors or the Trust. Participants identified factors that mitigated adverse impact.
Conclusions Although many of the issues described by participants are likely immutable components of healthcare in a pandemic there were several important protective factors that emerged from the data. Experience, debriefing and breaks from covid-19 wards were valuable to participants and successfully achieving a peaceful death for the patient was often viewed as compensation for a difficult journey. These protective factors may provide modelling for future education and support services to help prevent moral injury – or aide in its recovery.
Registration registered on the Open Science Framework 10.17605/OSF.IO/XB8YH
Strengths and Limitations
Single Centre Study
The lead author had pre-existing relationships with study participants
The lead author, under strict supervision, practiced a reflexivity based approach to data collection and analysis with objectivity benchmarking from the second author.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Lisa Wann, Research and Innovation manager, acting on behalf of University Hospitals of Leicester acted as the research sponsor and waived ethical approval for the work. NHS Research Ethics Committee review was not felt to be necessary as the research only included NHS staff.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
