ABSTRACT
Introduction Child abuse and neglect can seriously impair social development, learning, physical, and psychological health. Oral health practitioners can recognize the orofacial manifestations of maltreatment in a dental setting, provide necessary support, and refer concern to child protection agencies to prevent further harm. There is a need to understand the responsiveness of oral health practitioners to a child protection concern. This protocol outlines the systematic processes to map evidence in the field of child protection in oral health.
Methods and analysis This review will be guided by the PRISMA-ScR and the JBI guidelines. Primary and secondary studies, reviews, guidelines, and editorial articles written in English will be included in the review. A three-step search will be implemented. An initial search is conducted to finalised the search terms and eligbility criteria followed by a second search involving sensitive searches of databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Dentistry & Oral Science Source, and Cochrane Library). A third search will involve grey literature searching for unpublished materials. Government and international health organization websites will be searched during the third search. Eligible studies will be screened based on the participants (oral health practitioners), the concept (child protection) and the context (dental setting) and data extracted by two reviewers. Outcomes from the data extraction chart will be synthesized through exploratory narratives.
Ethics and dissemination This study involves neither human participants nor unpublished secondary data. As such, ethics approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journals, professional networks, and conferences.
Strengths and limitations of this study
This study will systemically identify literature from a broad range of databases and map evidence in the field of child protection in oral health.
The review will take a rigorous approach adhering to the PRISMA-ScR and and the JBI guidelines.
Multiple reviewers will conduct screening and data extraction independently to facilitate reliability.
A limitation is that only sources in English will be reviewed.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests No competing interest
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
