Abstract
Introduction For many exposures present across the lifecourse, the effect of the exposure may vary over time. Multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) is an approach that can assess the effects of related risk factors using genetic variants as instrumental variables. Recently, multivariable Mendelian randomization has been used to estimate the effects of an exposure during distinct time periods.
Methods We investigated the behaviour of estimates from MVMR in a simulation study for different time-varying causal scenarios. We also performed an applied analysis to consider how MVMR estimates of body mass index on systolic blood pressure vary depending on the time periods considered.
Results Estimates from MVMR in the simulation study were close to the true values when the outcome model was correctly specified: that is, when the outcome was a discrete function of the exposure at the precise timepoints at which the exposure was measured. However, in more realistic cases, MVMR estimates were not only incorrect, but misleading. For example, in one scenario MVMR estimates for early life were clearly negative despite the true causal effect being constant and positive. In the applied example, estimates were highly variable depending on the time period in which genetic associations with the exposure were estimated.
Conclusions The poor performance of MVMR to study time-varying causal effects can be attributed to model misspecification and violation of the exclusion restriction assumption. We would urge caution about quantitative conclusions from such analyses and even qualitative interpretations about the direction, or presence or absence of a causal effect during a given time period.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the United Kingdom Research and Innovation Medical Research Council (MC\_UU\_00002/7) and the National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study involves only openly available human data, which can be obtained from UK Biobank. The research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 7439.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors