Abstract
The Multiple Comparison Procedure and Modelling (MCPMod) approach has been shown to be a powerful statistical tool that can significantly improve the design and analysis of dose finding studies under model uncertainty. Due to its frequentist nature, however, it is difficult to incorporate into MCPMod information from historical trials on the same drug. Recently, a Bayesian version of MCPMod has been introduced by Fleischer et al. (2022) to resolve this issue, which is particularly tailored to the situation where there is information about the placebo dose group from historical trials. In practice, information may also be available on active dose groups from early phase trials, e.g., a dose escalation trial and a preceding small Proof of Concept trial with only a placebo and a high dose. To address this issue, we introduce a Bayesian hierarchical framework capable of incorporating historical information about both placebo and active dose groups with the flexibility of modelling both prognostic and predictive between-trial heterogeneity. Our method is particularly useful in the situation where the effect sizes of two trials are different. Our goal is to reduce the necessary sample size in the dose finding trial while maintaining its target power.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
