Abstract
Template-based segmentation techniques have been used for targeting deep brain structures in fetal MR images. In this study, two registration algorithms were compared to determine the optimal strategy of segmenting subcortical structures in T2-weighted images acquired during the third trimester of pregnancy. Adult women with singleton pregnancies (n=9) ranging from 35-39 weeks gestational age were recruited. Fetal MRI were performed on 1.5 T and 3 T scanners. Automatic fetal brain segmentation and volumetric reconstruction algorithms were performed on all subjects using the NiftyMIC software. An atlas of cortical and subcortical structures (36 weeks’ gestation) was registered into native space using ANTs (Automatic Normalization Tools) and FLIRT (FMRIB’s linear image registration tool). The cerebellum and thalamus were manually segmented. Dice coefficients were calculated to validate the reliability of automatic methods and to compare the performance between ANTs (nonlinear) and FLIRT (affine) registration algorithms compared to the gold-standard manual segmentations. The Dice-kappa values for the automated labels were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Comparing cerebellum and thalamus masks against the manually segmented masks, the median Dice-kappa coefficients for ANTs and FLIRT were 0.76 (interquartile range [IQR]= 0.56-0.83) and 0.65 (IQR=0.5-0.73), respectively. The Wilcoxon test (Z=4.9, P<0.01) indicated that the ANTs registration method performed better than FLIRT for the fetal cerebellum and thalamus. We found that a nonlinear registration method, provided improved results compared to an affine transformation. Nonlinear registration methods may be preferable for subcortical segmentations in MR images acquired in third-trimester fetuses.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The Canadian Institutes of Health Research, New Frontiers in Research Fund and the Canada First Research Excellence Fund provided the funding for this research.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of Western University gave ethics approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
