ABSTRACT
Background The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is a federally funded public benefit providing critical food assistance to millions of Americans. However, it is typically administered by states, creating potential variation in accessibility and transparency of information about enrollment for people with disabilities.
Objective To create a method to assess the accessibility and transparency of information about the disability-inclusive process and practices of SNAP enrollment
Methods Data was collected from SNAP landing and enrollment webpages from all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and New York City from June-August 2021. Based on key principles of universal design and accessibility, scores were determined for each SNAP program across three areas: flexibility in the enrollment process (6 points), efficiency of finding information about enrollment on SNAP websites (6 points), and the accessibility of SNAP webpages (6 points). Total scores were the sum of these sub-categories (18 points maximum).
Results Of the 52 SNAP programs assessed, mean scores were 10.66 (SD=2.51) for the total score, 2.67 (SD=0.91) for flexibility in the enrollment process, 3.32 (SD=1.19) for efficiency of finding information about enrollment on SNAP websites, and 4.67 (SD=1.72) for the accessibility of SNAP webpage. A total of 0 SNAP programs received the maximum score (6 points) on flexibility, 2 programs the maximum on efficiency, and 31 programs the maximum on accessibility.
Conclusions We found differences in the accessibility, flexibility, and efficiency of SNAP program enrollment information available on SNAP websites and outline much room for improvement across all three of these areas.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (K01AG054751) awarded to LJS
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclosures: This work was supported by the National Institute on Aging (K01AG054751) awarded to LJS. No conflicts of interest to declare for any authors.
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at https://disabilityhealth.jhu.edu/snapdashboard/
