Abstract
Many pain biomarkers fail to move from discovery to clinical application, attributed to poor reliability and feasible classifications of at-risk individuals. Preliminary evidence has shown that higher pain sensitivity is associated with slow peak alpha frequency (PAF) and depression of corticomotor excitability (CME). The present study evaluated the reliability of these measures, specifically whether, over several days of pain, a) PAF remains stable and b) individuals show two stable and distinct CME responses: facilitation and depression. Seventy-five healthy participants were given an injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) into the right masseter muscle on Day 0 and Day 2, inducing sustained pain. Electroencephalography (EEG) to assess PAF and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess CME were recorded on Day 0, Day 2 and Day 5. PAF reliability was in the excellent range even without standard pre-processing and ∼2 minutes recording length. Moreover, two distinct and stable CME responses were demonstrated: facilitation and depression. These findings support the notion that PAF is a stable trait characteristic, with reliability unaffected by pain, and excellent reliability achievable with minimal pre-processing and ∼2 minutes recording, making it a readily translatable biomarker. Furthermore, the study showed novel evidence of two stable corticomotor adaptations to sustained pain. Overall, the study provides support for the reliability of PAF and CME as prospective cortical biomarkers.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT04241562
Funding Statement
Thus study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (R61 NS113269/NS/NINDS NIH HHS/United States)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of University of New South Wales gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Disclosures The authors have no conflicts to declare.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
