ABSTRACT
Objective To estimate dose-response associations between non-occupational physical activity and multiple chronic disease outcomes in the general adult population.
Eligibility criteria Prospective cohort studies with (a) general population samples >10,000 adults, (b) ≥3 exposure categories, and (c) risk measures and confidence intervals for all-cause mortality, total cardiovascular disease, coronary heart disease, stroke, heart failure, total cancer, and site-specific cancers (head and neck, myeloid leukemia, myeloma, gastric cardia, lung, liver, endometrium, colon, breast, bladder, rectum, esophagus, prostate, kidney).
Information sources PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and reference lists of published studies, searched in February 2019.
Data extraction and synthesis Independent extraction and double-checking of study characteristics, exposure, and outcome assessment by two reviewers for each paper. Primary exposure was non-occupational physical activity volume, harmonized to physical activity energy expenditure in marginal MET-hours per week (mMET-h/week). The current minimum recommendations for physical activity (150 min/week of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) equate to 8.75 mMET-h/week. Outcomes were risks of mortality, cardiovascular diseases, and cancers. We used restricted cubic splines in random-effects meta-analyses. Potential population impact was quantified using impact fractions.
Results 196 articles were included, covering 94 cohorts. The evidence base was largest for all-cause mortality (50 independent results; 163,415,543 person-years; 811,616 events), and incidence of cardiovascular disease (37 independent results; 28,884,209 person-years; 74,757 events) and cancer (31 independent results; 35,500,867 person-years; 185,870 events). In general, inverse non-linear associations were observed, steeper between 0 and 8.75 mMET-h/week, with smaller marginal reductions in risk above this level to 17.5 mMET-h/week, beyond which additional reductions were small and uncertain. Associations were stronger for all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality than for cancer mortality. If all insufficiently active individuals had met the recommended physical activity level, 15.7% (95%CI: 13.1 to 18.2%) of all premature deaths would have been averted.
Conclusions Inverse non-linear dose-response associations suggest substantial protection against a range of chronic disease outcomes from small increases in non-occupational physical activity in inactive adults.
Review registration PROSPERO CRD42018095481.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Protocols
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018095481
Funding Statement
Garcia, Abbas, and Woodcock were supported by METAHIT, an MRC Methodology Panel project (MR/P02663X/1). Abbas, Pearce, and Woodcock have received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme (grant agreement 817754) (this material reflects only the author's views, and the Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein). Garcia, Abbas, and Woodcock were supported by the Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence funded by the British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and the Wellcome Trust (MR/K023187/1). Dempsey was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Research Fellowship (No. 1142685). Golubic was supported by a Gates Cambridge Scholarship. Pearce and Brage was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Cambridge (IS-BRC-1215-20014). Mok was supported by the National Science Scholarship from Singapore, A*STAR. Sa was supported by the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (2012/08565-4 and 2013/25624-7), and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (200358/2014-6 and 402648/2015-3). Pearce, Strain, Dempsey, Wijndaele, and Brage were supported by UK Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12015/3, MC_UU_00006/4). Funders and sponsors had no role in any stage of the work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
In Table 1, the PIF column for 17.5 mMET-h/week was showing relative risks (i.e., the same as the previous column). This has been corrected in this version.
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at https://shiny.mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk/meta-analyses-physical-activity/
https://osf.io/pnvdc/?view_only=d7d8338ed63a486c8038ead389f34159
https://shiny.mrc-epid.cam.ac.uk/meta-analyses-physical-activity/
