Abstract
In this article we assess the effectiveness of the restrictions, implemented at government level, to curb the first wave of the COVID-19 outbreak (January-May 2020) in seven European countries. The analysis put in evidence a strong correlation (correlation coefficient greater than 0.85) between one of the statistical parameters of the distribution representing the temporal evolution of the weekly number of patients admitted into the Intensive Cure Unit (ICU), i.e., the skewness, and the Stringency Index, an aggregate synthetic variable that reflects the level of implemented restrictions by a specific country on a scale between 0 (no restrictions) and 100 (full lockdown). Then, to assess if the skewness is consistent in effectively reflecting the applied restrictions, we computed the skewness for non-Covid flu outbreaks during four years from 2014-2015 to 2018-2019 and Covid-19 outbreak, where no restrictions were applied in Italy. The results highlight a significant difference between the values of the skewness for the normal flu with respect to the COVID-19 outbreak. This large difference put in evidence that the implemented restrictions modify the skewness of the ICU hospitalized patient number distribution. The skewness then can be used as a valid indicator to assess if the restriction had any effect on pandemic transmission and can be used as a support for decision makers.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Not Applicable
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
N/A
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Not Applicable
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Not Applicable
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Not Applicable
Data Availability
All dataset is freely available online https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/covid-19-government-response-tracker
https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/covid-19-government-response-tracker
