Abstract
Computational models offer a unique setting to test strategies to mitigate infectious diseases’ spread, providing useful insights to applied public health. To be actionable, models need to be informed by data, which can be available at different levels of detail. While high resolution data describing contacts between individuals are increasingly available, data gathering remains challenging, especially during a health emergency: many models thus use synthetic data or coarse information to evaluate intervention protocols. Here, we evaluate how the representation of contact data might affect the impact of various strategies in models, in the realm of COVID-19 transmission in educational and work contexts. Starting from high resolution contact data, we use data representations ranging from very detailed to very coarse to inform a model for the spread of SARS-CoV-2 and simulate several mitigation strategies. We find that coarse data representations underestimate the risk of super-spreading events. However, the rankings of protocols according to their efficiency or cost remain coherent across representations, ensuring the consistency of model findings to inform public health advice. Caution should be taken, however, on the quantitative estimations of those benefits and costs that may trigger the adoption of protocols, as these may depend on data representation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was partially funded by: ANR projects COSCREEN (ANR-21-CO16-0005) and DATAREDUX (ANR-19-CE46-0008-03); ANRS-MIE project EMERGEN (ANRS0151); EU H2020 grants MOOD (H2020-874850) and RECOVER (H2020-101003589); EU HORIZON grant VERDI (101045989); REACTing COVID-19 grant.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study involves only openly available human data, which can be obtained from: http://www.sociopatterns.org/
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
