Abstract
Background A recent meta-analysis suggested that using physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) labels results in people selecting and consuming less energy. Only one included study was conducted in a naturalistic setting, in four convenience stores. The current study aimed to estimate the effect of PACE labels on energy purchased in worksite cafeterias.
Methods and findings A stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial to test the effect of PACE labels (which include kcal content and minutes of walking required to expend the energy content of the labelled food) on energy purchased. The setting was ten worksite cafeterias in England, which were randomised to the order in which they introduced PACE labels on selected food and drinks following a baseline period. The study ran for 12 weeks with over 250,000 transactions recorded on electronic tills. The primary outcome was total energy (kcal) purchased from intervention items per day. The secondary outcomes were: energy purchased from non-intervention items per day, total energy purchased per day, and revenue. Regression models showed no evidence of an overall effect on energy purchased from intervention items, -1.3% (95% CI -3.5% to 0.9%) during the intervention. Of the 10 cafeterias, there were null results in five, significant reductions in four, and a significant increase in one. There was also no evidence for an effect on energy purchased from non-intervention items, -0.0% (95% CI -1.8% to 1.8%), and no clear evidence for total items -1.6% (95% CI -3.3% to 0.0%). Revenue increased during the intervention, 1.1% (95% CI 0.4% to 1.9%). Study limitations include using energy purchased and not energy consumed, and access only to transaction-level sales, rather than individual-level data.
Conclusion Overall, the evidence was consistent with PACE labels not changing energy purchased in worksite cafeterias. There was considerable variation in effects between cafeterias, suggesting potentially important unmeasured moderators.
Trial registration The study was prospectively registered on ISRCTN (date: 30.03.21; ISRCTN31315776).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
ISRCTN31315776
Funding Statement
This report is independent research funded by a collaborative Award in Science from Wellcome Trust (Behaviour Change by Design: 206853/Z/17/Z) awarded to Theresa Marteau, Paul Fletcher, Gareth Hollands, and Marcus Munafo. RP is supported by a Wellcome Trust Research Fellowship in Society and Ethics [106679/Z/14/Z]. The University of Cambridge was the study sponsor. The funders and sponsor were not involved in the study design, data collection, management, analysis, interpretation, writing, or submission of this manuscript.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Cambridge Psychology Research Ethics Committee based at the University of Cambridge approved the trial on 08.12.20 (No. PRE.2020.105).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
This study includes sales data from the collaborating companies. Due to contractual restrictions to the use of the sales data, these data cannot be made openly available.
