Abstract
This study examined how social isolation and subjective loneliness impacted subjective well-being across Japan, with the aim of offering policy recommendations. We analyzed data (N = 5,234, age:15-89) obtained through a Japanese population-based national survey conducted in March 2021. First, we found that mean life satisfaction was statistically lowest among the subgroup of respondents who lived alone (approximately 20% of the total), with more pronounced impacts in males. We also found that the frequency of social networking site (SNS) usage was significantly associated with overall life satisfaction, exhibiting a J-curve (three to four times per week was better than everyday usage). The frequency of interaction with others, number of SNS friends, employment/wage satisfaction, family budget/asset satisfaction, subjective health satisfaction, and subjective connectedness were also related to well-being in a dose-dependent manner (Trend P<0.001). Second, our multiple logistic regression model showed that the above relationships were independently and statistically significant (p<0.05). Moreover, a stratified analysis showed that living alone significantly affected these relationships, which suggests that this condition should specifically be addressed in the context of efforts aimed at enhancing subjective well-being. In addition, respondents who lived alone had low subjective connectedness, which also independently influenced well-being, as shown by our multivariate logistic model. In sum, these findings indicate that national well-being enhancement policies should particularly consider social isolation and loneliness, including issues stemming from low social connectedness.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The ethical oversight was waived by the decision of Institutional Review Board of Research Institute of Occupational Mental Health.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
E-mail addresses: Koichi Miyaki: miyaki.koichi.x37{at}kyoto-u.jp
Takashi Kawamura: kawamura.takashi.6u{at}kyoto-u.jp
Hirohisa Takano: takano.hirohisa.4x{at}kyoto-u.ac.jp
Kan Hiroshi Suzuki: suzukan{at}pp.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Data Availability
The dataset is publicly available from the Cabinet Office (CAO) of the Japanese government website: https://form.cao.go.jp/keizai2/opinion-0011.html