Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Semantic speech networks linked to formal thought disorder in early psychosis

View ORCID ProfileCaroline R Nettekoven, Kelly Diederen, Oscar Giles, Helen Duncan, Iain Stenson, Julianna Olah, Toni Gibbs-Dean, Nigel Collier, Petra E Vértes, Tom J Spencer, Sarah E Morgan, Philip McGuire
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.25.22271517
Caroline R Nettekoven
1Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Caroline R Nettekoven
  • For correspondence: crn29@cantab.ac.uk
Kelly Diederen
2Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oscar Giles
3The Alan Turing Institute, London, NW1 2DB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helen Duncan
3The Alan Turing Institute, London, NW1 2DB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iain Stenson
3The Alan Turing Institute, London, NW1 2DB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Julianna Olah
2Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toni Gibbs-Dean
2Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nigel Collier
4Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Faculty of Modern and Medieval Languages, University of Cambridge, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Petra E Vértes
1Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
3The Alan Turing Institute, London, NW1 2DB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom J Spencer
2Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah E Morgan
5Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, UK
1Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, UK
3The Alan Turing Institute, London, NW1 2DB, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Philip McGuire
2Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis Mapping a patient’s speech as a network has proved to be a useful way of understanding formal thought disorder in psychosis. However, to date, graph theory tools have not incorporated the semantic content of speech, which is altered in psychosis.

Study Design We developed an algorithm, “netts”, to map the semantic content of speech as a network, then applied netts to construct semantic speech networks for a general population sample, and a clinical sample comprising patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), people at clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR-P), and healthy controls.

Study Results Semantic speech networks from the general population were more connected than size-matched randomised networks, with fewer and larger connected components, reflecting the non-random nature of speech. Networks from FEP patients were smaller than from healthy participants, for a picture description task but not a story recall task. For the former task, FEP networks were also more fragmented than those from controls; showing more, smaller connected components. CHR-P networks showed fragmentation values in-between FEP patients and controls. A clustering analysis suggested that semantic speech networks captured novel signal not already described by existing NLP measures. Network features were also related to negative symptom scores and scores on the Thought and Language Index, although these relationships did not survive correcting for multiple comparisons.

Conclusions Overall, these data suggest that semantic networks can enable deeper phenotyping of formal thought disorder in psychosis. We are releasing Netts as an open Python package alongside this manuscript.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

We thank the services users and volunteers who took part in this study, and the members of the Outreach and Support in South London (OASIS) team who were involved in the recruitment, management and clinical follow-up of the participants reported in this manuscript. SEM was supported by the Accelerate Programme for Scientific Discovery, funded by Schmidt Futures and a Fellowship from The Alan Turing Institute, London. PEV is supported by a fellowship from MQ: Transforming Mental Health (MQF17_24). This work was supported by The Alan Turing Institute under the EPSRC grant EP/N510129/1, the UK Medical Research Council (MRC, grant number G0700995), the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014), the King's Health Partners (Research and Development Challenge Fund) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Mental Health Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, MRC or the Department of Health and Social Care. The funder had no influence on the design of the study or interpretation of the results.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical approval for the clinical study was obtained from the Institute of Psychiatry Research Ethics Committee, whilst ethical approval for the general population study was obtained from the Kings College London Research Ethics Committee. Ethical approval for the general population study was obtained through Kings College London [REMAS MRA-19/20-19444]. Data collected via Gorilla was compliant with EU GDPR2016 and Gorillas Data Processing Agreement, consistent with NIHR guidance.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵* Joint last authorship

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 28, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Semantic speech networks linked to formal thought disorder in early psychosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Semantic speech networks linked to formal thought disorder in early psychosis
Caroline R Nettekoven, Kelly Diederen, Oscar Giles, Helen Duncan, Iain Stenson, Julianna Olah, Toni Gibbs-Dean, Nigel Collier, Petra E Vértes, Tom J Spencer, Sarah E Morgan, Philip McGuire
medRxiv 2022.02.25.22271517; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.25.22271517
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Semantic speech networks linked to formal thought disorder in early psychosis
Caroline R Nettekoven, Kelly Diederen, Oscar Giles, Helen Duncan, Iain Stenson, Julianna Olah, Toni Gibbs-Dean, Nigel Collier, Petra E Vértes, Tom J Spencer, Sarah E Morgan, Philip McGuire
medRxiv 2022.02.25.22271517; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.25.22271517

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (228)
  • Allergy and Immunology (504)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1238)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (531)
  • Epidemiology (10021)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (499)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2453)
  • Geriatric Medicine (238)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1643)
  • Health Policy (752)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (636)
  • Hematology (248)
  • HIV/AIDS (533)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11864)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (252)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2280)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (352)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (536)
  • Oncology (1245)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (157)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (730)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (313)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2280)
  • Public and Global Health (4834)
  • Radiology and Imaging (837)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (491)
  • Respiratory Medicine (651)
  • Rheumatology (285)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (238)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (267)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)