Abstract
The Centers for Disease Control allows rapid antigen testing (RAT) towards the end of a 5-day isolation for COVID-19 infection to determine eligibility to leave isolation. The impact of a test-to-return (TTR) program in schools is unknown. In January 2022 a Massachusetts school district initiated a TTR program utilizing a single school-administered RAT on days 5-9 after symptom onset or positive test, whichever was first. Of 636 students with COVID-19 infection, 408 (64.2%) participated in TTR; of these, 128 (31.4%) had a positive TTR rapid antigen test. Students who were symptomatic at any time during their infection were more likely to have a positive TTR than those who were never symptomatic (43.1% vs. 17.3%); positivity rates were lower when TTR was performed later during days 6-9. TTR may identify students who carry higher viral loads after recovery from COVID-19 infection thereby extending their isolation, while facilitating earlier return of those with negative results.
Introduction
In December 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) updated guidance for people with SARS-CoV-2 infection, enabling end of isolation on day 6 after symptom onset (or positive test, if asymptomatic) for those with symptom improvement and ability to mask through day 10.1 However, some individuals still carry culturable virus beyond day 5.2 Rapid antigen test (RAT) positivity correlates with higher SARS-CoV-2 viral load and the ability to culture replication-competent virus, 3,4 and has been considered a proxy for contagiousness.
In January 2022, CDC updated its guidance to allow RAT towards the end of the 5-day isolation. A negative test permits cessation of isolation, while a positive result extends isolation through day 10. The impact of utilizing a “test-to-return” (TTR) program in school districts is unknown.
Methods
In January 2022, a public school district in eastern Massachusetts initiated a TTR program. Students and staff isolating for COVID-19 infection could return on day 6-10 if afebrile without antipyretics, with symptom improvement, and with a negative RAT conducted by school staff. Participants with a positive RAT and those who declined TTR maintained isolation until day 11. Eligible individuals could take a school-administered test once between days 5-9.
Data from all SARS-CoV-2 cases reported to the district with onset between December 27, 2021 and January 24, 2022 were included. Staff or student, grade level, presence of symptoms at any time during illness, date of symptom onset, date and type of initial positive test, vaccination status, and date and result of school-administered RAT for TTR participants were recorded. Day 0 of infection was considered the date of symptom onset if symptomatic or date of initial positive test, whichever came first. Eligibility for TTR and return to school was calculated forward from day 0.
Positivity rates were calculated for the entire cohort and compared by grade level, type of initial test, vaccination status, presence of symptoms during illness, and day of infection on which TTR was conducted (chi square tests, R software).5 Data among staff cases were insufficient for analysis.
Results
Cases were reported among 636 students (Table 1); 67.8% with known symptom status were symptomatic. Of 408 TTR participants (64.2% of total), 128 (31.4%) had a positive RAT. There were no differences in TTR positivity by grade level, type of initial test, or vaccination status. Compared to always-asymptomatic students, ever-symptomatic students were more likely to have a positive TTR RAT (75/174[43.1%] vs. 18/104[17.3%]). TTR positivity decreased by day of infection (p=0.02; Table 1 and Figure 1).
Discussion
In a public school district during the Omicron surge, 31% of students with SARS-CoV-2 infection had a positive RAT 5-9 days after symptom onset or positive test, despite symptom improvement. This proportion is similar to model predictions6 and observed results in health care workers.7 Ever-symptomatic students were more likely to have a positive TTR than students who remained asymptomatic (43 vs. 17%).
This study is subject to several limitations. First, students had only one opportunity to participate in TTR; some may have pre-tested or delayed TTR to ensure a negative school-administered test. If all persons meeting time and symptom criteria had tested on day 5 or 6, the positivity rate would likely have been higher. Second, the correlation between RAT and culture-positivity is not yet understood for the Omicron variant, although preliminary data suggests that RAT remains sensitive when viral load is high by RT-PCR.8
Implementation of TTR programs in schools has both advantages and costs. Compared to schools that allow return on day 6 without TTR, schools with TTR programs may have fewer school-associated transmissions, but more missed school days. However, as an alternative to isolation through day 10, TTR programs will reduce the number of missed school days. While TTR programs may identify those individuals who still carry replication-competent virus, spread in schools has been rare when masks are worn consistently; further, the risk of school-associated transmission during days 6-10 is not known. When return occurs prior to day 11 without TTR, districts should assume that some students could still be infectious. For students on days 6-10, strict adherence to masking (consistent with CDC guidance) and safe distance during unmasked periods, including lunchtime, are essential.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors and subject to the rules of the collaborating district.