Abstract
Atypicalities in processing of social rewards have been suggested to lie at the root of social difficulties in autism spectrum conditions (ASC). While evidence for atypical reward function in ASC is mounting, it remains unclear whether it manifests specifically in hypo- or hyper-responsiveness, and whether it appears only in the social domain or more generally. Moreover, stimuli used as social rewards in studies often lack familiarity and relevance, which are known to enhance reward-related responses. In this study, we investigated behavioural (reaction times and ratings), neuronal (event-related potentials), and autonomic (pupil sizes) responses to three conditions – relevant social rewards, money, and neutral informative outcomes – in 26 ASC and 53 non-autistic subjects varying in levels of autistic traits, as measured with the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ). We used both a population-based approach (low AQ vs. high AQ) and a psychopathological approach (low AQ vs. ASC) to investigate the effects of both sub-clinical and clinical autistic traits on reward responsiveness. As hypothesised and preregistered, autism and autistic traits did not differently influence responses to social, monetary, and neutral outcomes on behavioural, neuronal or autonomic level. Although the ASC group rated the stimuli’s motivational and rewarding values lower than the other groups, the task performance was similar for all participants. Moreover, the ASC group in contrast to low AQ group showed enhanced brain responses (the CNV) in early anticipation and larger pupil constrictions in reward reception. Both effects were also predicted by autistic traits (AQ). Together, our results do not offer evidence for specifically social reward deficits in ASC. Instead, the data suggest enhanced neuronal and autonomic reward responsiveness linked to autism with simultaneously typical performance and reduced self-reported motivational and rewarding values of stimuli. Together, these results emphasise the need to investigate multiple processing levels for a broader picture of reward responsiveness in ASC.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by funding from the Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin and the German Academic Exchange Service (Deutsche Akademische Austauschdienst; DAAD) awarded to M.M.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Psychology of the Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Anonymised and aggregated data, analysis code in R, and an html file including all analyses steps and results can be found at https://osf.io/vse38/
