Abstract
Engaging in demanding mental activities requires the allocation of cognitive control, which can be effortful and aversive. Individuals thus tend to avoid exerting cognitive effort if less demanding behavioral options are available. Recent accounts propose a key role for dopamine in motivating behavior by increasing the sensitivity to rewards associated with effort exertion. Whether dopamine additionally plays a specific role in modulating the sensitivity to the costs of cognitive effort, even in the absence of any incentives, is much less clear. To address this question, we assessed cognitive effort avoidance in patients (n = 38) with Parkinson’s disease, a condition characterized by loss of midbrain dopaminergic neurons, both ON and OFF dopaminergic medication and compared them to healthy controls (n = 24). Effort avoidance was assessed using the Demand Selection Task (DST), in which participants could freely choose between performing a high-demand or a low-demand version of a task-switching paradigm. Critically, participants were not offered any incentives to choose the more effortful option, nor for good performance. Healthy controls and patients OFF their dopaminergic medications preferred the low-demand option, in keeping with the tendency to avoid effort on this task previously demonstrated in young adults. In contrast, patients ON dopaminergic medications displayed significantly less effort avoidance than when they were OFF medications. This change in preference could not be explained by differences in task-switching performance or the patients’ ability to detect the different levels of cognitive demand in the DST. Our findings provide evidence that dopamine replacement in Parkinson’s patients increases the willingness to engage in cognitively demanding behavior, even in the absence of any clear benefits. These results suggest that dopamine plays a role in reducing the sensitivity to effort costs that is independent of its role in enhancing the sensitivity to the benefits of effort exertion.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This project was funded by the Parkinson Foundation and the Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé to M.S., the NSERC Discovery Grant and the New Researchers Startup Grant from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Nature et Technologies to A.R.O., and by a postdoctoral fellowship by the German Research Foundation (DFG) to M.B.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board gave ethical approval of this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
