Abstract
Introduction The NHS is experiencing increased pressures due to an ageing population and rising health inequalities. GPs spend almost a fifth of their patient facing time addressing non-medical problems such as social isolation, financial struggles, and bereavement. Recent research suggests that holistic approaches linking social care to primary care may be cost-effective in supporting patients. Social Prescribing (SP) is an approach which could help individuals by sign posting and referral to non-clinical services, which can promote improvements in mental health and wellbeing, building resilience using community assets. The EmotionMind Dynamic (EMD) is a lifestyle coaching programme that supports individuals suffering from anxiety or depression referred from the health and social care sectors. EMD offers a unique, non-clinical mixed-modality approach combining coaching, mentoring, counselling skills, teaching and mindfulness. EMD is an adaptable, guided self-help tool that can be used as a preventative, supportive or reactive measure for improving mental health and wellbeing.
Methods SROI methodology will be used to evaluate the EMD service. The aim of the SROI analysis is to develop a programme-level theory of change to establish how inputs (e.g. costs, staffing) are converted into outputs (e.g. numbers of clients seen), and subsequently into outcomes that matter to clients impacted by EMD coaching (e.g. improved mental wellbeing). Fifty participants will be recruited including clients who have completed the EMD programme and new clients participating in the online blended learning format. Face-to-face and blended learning formats will offer six sessions over a three-month period. A mixed-method approach will collect quantitative and qualitative from questionnaires and interviews. Outcomes will measure improvements in mental wellbeing and self-efficacy. Wellbeing valuation will be applied to quantify and value outcomes. Social value ratios will be generated from two value sets, one from the Social Value Bank and the other from the Short Warwick Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale.
Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval of this proposed study has been granted by the Medical and Health Sciences ethics committee, Bangor University. A final report will be presented to key stakeholders and research findings will be published in peer reviewed journals
Strengths and limitations of this study
The first study to undertake a SROI analysis on lifestyle coaching to improve mental wellbeing resilience
Applies a mixed-method approach using both quantitative and qualitative data, using valid and reliable outcome measures
Researchers working with the same data may arrive at different SROI ratios
The matching of outcomes from proposed study data with the most appropriate SVB value will depend on the research team’s discretion and agreement. This could potentially introduce researcher bias and the likelihood that potential estimates of social value generated could be upward-biased
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by Accelerate: the Welsh Health Innovation and Technology Accelerator East Wales ERDF No. 80751.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval of this study has been approved by Medical and Health Sciences ethics committee, Bangor University (Reference number: 2021-16927). Participant data will be anonymised, and no participants will be identifiable in the results. Participants will be reminded that they can withdraw from the study at any time without explanation. A full report will be submitted to the funders at the conclusion of the study and findings will be available to the key stakeholders and the general public. In addition, academic papers will be submitted for publication to peer-reviewed academic journals.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Questionnaire data and consent forms will be stored on an online questionnaire platform. Only authorised personnel will have access to the data. Additional security measures for the platform include continual monitoring of up-time (when the platform is live and accessed online) as well as unauthorised attempts for admin logins. Regular back-ups of the entire website are automated, retaining a copy of the website files for emergency use. The website is hosted on UK based hosted servers which have 24/7 support where required. Responses from the questionnaires will be manually entered into Microsoft Excel for summary and analysis. Interview audio recordings and transcriptions will be uploaded to a secure network that only core members of the advisory team will have access to. The final dataset will only be available to the study investigators and the Advisory Team.
