Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Values and preferences of the general population in Indonesia in relation to COVID-19 self-testing: A cross-sectional survey

Caroline Thomas, View ORCID ProfileSonjelle Shilton, Catherine Thomas, View ORCID ProfileDeepshikha Batheja, Srishti Goel, Claudius Mone Iye, View ORCID ProfileElena Ivanova, Guillermo Z. Martínez-Pérez
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.23.22269718
Caroline Thomas
1Peduli Hati Bangsa, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonjelle Shilton
2FIND, the global alliance for diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sonjelle Shilton
  • For correspondence: sonjelle.shilton@finddx.org
Catherine Thomas
1Peduli Hati Bangsa, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deepshikha Batheja
3Centre for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Deepshikha Batheja
Srishti Goel
3Centre for Disease Dynamics, Economics and Policy, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudius Mone Iye
1Peduli Hati Bangsa, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elena Ivanova
2FIND, the global alliance for diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Elena Ivanova
Guillermo Z. Martínez-Pérez
2FIND, the global alliance for diagnostics, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objectives Innovative diagnostics are essential to assist members of the general population become active agents of case detection. In Indonesia, a country with an over-burdened healthcare system, individuals could use self-tests for SARS-CoV-2 to determine their COVID-19 status. To assess the acceptability of SARS-CoV-2 self-testing among the general population in Indonesia, a cross-sectional, population-based survey was conducted in mid-2021 in Jakarta and the provinces of Banten and North Sulawesi.

Methods This was a survey that approached respondents in >600 randomly selected street-points in the three study geographies. A 35-item questionnaire was used to collect data on key variables, such as willingness to use and to pay for a SARS-CoV-2 self-test and likely actions following a positive result. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed.

Results Of 630 respondents, (318 were female), 14% knew about COVID-19 self-testing, while 62.7% agreed with the concept of people being able to self-test at home, unassisted, for COVID-19. If self-tests were available in Indonesia, >60% of respondents would use them if they felt it necessary and would undertake regular self-testing e.g., weekly if recommended. Upon receiving a positive self-test result, most respondents would communicate it (86.03%), request post-test counseling (80.79%), self-isolate (97.46%), and/or warn their close contacts (n=570, 90.48%).

Conclusions SARS-CoV-2 self-testing would be acceptable to a majority of the Indonesian public, to learn whether they have COVID-19. Self-testing could contribute to an over-burdened healthcare system by helping COVID-19-infected people become agents of change in epidemiological surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in their communities.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by the German government.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The survey protocol received ethical clearance from the Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya (Ref.: 0674A/III/LPPM-PM.10.05/06/2021)

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 24, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Values and preferences of the general population in Indonesia in relation to COVID-19 self-testing: A cross-sectional survey
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Values and preferences of the general population in Indonesia in relation to COVID-19 self-testing: A cross-sectional survey
Caroline Thomas, Sonjelle Shilton, Catherine Thomas, Deepshikha Batheja, Srishti Goel, Claudius Mone Iye, Elena Ivanova, Guillermo Z. Martínez-Pérez
medRxiv 2022.01.23.22269718; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.23.22269718
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Values and preferences of the general population in Indonesia in relation to COVID-19 self-testing: A cross-sectional survey
Caroline Thomas, Sonjelle Shilton, Catherine Thomas, Deepshikha Batheja, Srishti Goel, Claudius Mone Iye, Elena Ivanova, Guillermo Z. Martínez-Pérez
medRxiv 2022.01.23.22269718; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.23.22269718

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (179)
  • Allergy and Immunology (434)
  • Anesthesia (99)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (948)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
  • Dermatology (110)
  • Emergency Medicine (260)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (422)
  • Epidemiology (8987)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (420)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1959)
  • Geriatric Medicine (190)
  • Health Economics (402)
  • Health Informatics (1329)
  • Health Policy (660)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (519)
  • Hematology (212)
  • HIV/AIDS (420)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10809)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (575)
  • Medical Education (200)
  • Medical Ethics (54)
  • Nephrology (222)
  • Neurology (1830)
  • Nursing (110)
  • Nutrition (274)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (353)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (470)
  • Oncology (999)
  • Ophthalmology (298)
  • Orthopedics (111)
  • Otolaryngology (182)
  • Pain Medicine (126)
  • Palliative Medicine (44)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (580)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (276)
  • Primary Care Research (234)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1903)
  • Public and Global Health (4123)
  • Radiology and Imaging (676)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (368)
  • Respiratory Medicine (549)
  • Rheumatology (225)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (191)
  • Sports Medicine (177)
  • Surgery (207)
  • Toxicology (39)
  • Transplantation (109)
  • Urology (81)