Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

The McGill Approach to Core Stabilization in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review

Erica Laurin, Amir Minerbi, LCol Markus Besemann, Captain Isabel Courchesne, Gaurav Gupta
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.21.22269311
Erica Laurin
1University of Ottawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amir Minerbi
3Israel Institute for Technology
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LCol Markus Besemann
2Canadian Forces Health Services Centre – Ottawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Captain Isabel Courchesne
2Canadian Forces Health Services Centre – Ottawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gaurav Gupta
2Canadian Forces Health Services Centre – Ottawa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gaurav@trunostic.com
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is a major cause of disability and is progressively becoming worse on a global scale. [1,2] The prevention and rehabilitation of LBP lacks clarity in part due to the heterogeneity of the exercise programs prescribed to treat low back pain. Some authors have proposed stabilizing exercises for lower back pain which exert minimal loads on the spine. [3,4,5] Despite a multitude of existing exercise therapies, McGill has introduced three exercises for rehabilitating lower back pain, termed the McGill Big Three (MGB3). [6,7,8,9,10] These include the curl-up, side plank and bird-dog. The purpose of this review is to investigate the clinical outcomes from prescribing the MGB3 to individuals with chronic LBP.

Methods Inclusion criteria were randomized control trials that involved an intervention with MGB3 core stabilization exercises for patients with chronic low back pain. The research included articles published during any period in full English text. Studies were critically reviewed by two authors EL and GG independently and collaboratively.

Results In total, four randomized control trials were included in this review. Multiple cohorts, with varying age, demographics and occupation were studied. Outcomes studied included various pain scores, patient reported functional and performance measures.

Discussion Controlled clinical trials employing this method in low back pain treatment showed low quality data with mixed statistical significance, and little to no clinical significance irrespective of the measure used or even when compared to baseline. Limitations of these trials are detailed herein.

Conclusion Currently there is limited data supporting the clinical benefit of the McGill approach for the treatment of low back pain based on the available randomized clinical trials. More study is required prior to widespread adoption into clinical practice.

Introduction

Chronic low back pain (LBP), generally referred to as pain or stiffness in the lumbar region of the spine lasting a minimum of 12 weeks, is among the leading causes of disability globally. [11,12,13,14,15, 16,17] LBP poses an increasing medical and economic burden, attributable primarily to treatments costs and decreased work productivity. [1,2] The point prevalence and lifetime prevalence of LBP among the Canadian population is 28.4% and 84.1%, respectively. [18,19] The prevalence of chronic back issues within the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) is 16%, and LBP specifically accounts for 12% of medical releases each year. [20, 21]

Mechanical LBP is hypothesized to occur from anatomical structures such as the muscles, ligaments, bones, joints, spinal nerve roots, intervertebral discs and abdominal organs. [22,23,24] Associated precursors for mechanical LBP can include traumatic injury, structural abnormalities, pregnancy, infection, inflammatory disorders, degenerative conditions, disc herniation, radiculopathy and spinal stenosis. [25,26] Risk factors for LBP may include specific types of repetitive spinal motion, low socioeconomic status, medical and psychiatric comorbidities, and inadequate coping mechanisms. [15,27, 28,29] There is also emerging evidence indicating LBP is not only a regional issue given the studies supporting altered cerebral functional gray and white matter in patients, although the directionality and temporality have yet to be established. [30] Treatments include but are not limited to pharmaceuticals, exercise therapy, manual therapies, injections and surgery. [15,25,31,32]

Possibly owing to the various underlying causes of LBP, heterogeneity of evaluation tools and measures of success, some authors argue it is nearly impossible to formulate standardized exercise interventions to treat chronic LBP. [5,6,25,33,34]. However, within prescribed exercise therapies for LBP, core stabilization exercises have gained increased attention over the recent decade. [5,35,36,37] This type of exercise therapy has evolved into a mainstay for treating chronic LBP with focus on core stabilization and muscle coordination. [3,38,39,40,41,42,43]

Spinal stability is theorized to be an integration of active muscle contraction, passive ligament support and neural control. [39,40,42] Active muscle control can be further classified into local (i.e., segmental stability) and global stabilizers and dynamic control. [39,42,43]. Core stabilizing exercises train patterns of muscle activity and posture without producing excessive loading of the spine. [44,45] Stability is determined by various motor patterns that differ in aspects such as demand, load and speed. [45]

Therefore, it is of great interest to validate the most clinically effective rehabilitation program for individuals with LBP. Various approaches have been studied including generalized flexibility, variable load anterior/posterior muscle training, along with the low to no load lumbo-pelvic region based on the global muscle stabilization described by McGill. [40,41,42,43] Based on numerous biomechanical and clinical studies, McGill has proposed stabilizing exercises which apply minimal loads on the spine to reduce and prevent LBP. [3] This includes tailored programs built around three exercises termed the “McGill Big Three” (MGB3) which include the curl-up, side plank and bird-dog (please see Figure 1 for examples of these exercises). [10]

Figure 1: The McGill Big “3” Core Stabilization exercises

Figure 1.1. Curl-up

Pls see https://www.healthaya.com/publications

Figure 1.2. Side-plank

Pls see https://www.healthaya.com/publications

Figure 1.3. Bird-dog

Pls see https://www.healthaya.com/publications

In order to further delineate the clinical impact of the McGill approach in the treatment of chronic low back pain, we undertook a review of the existing literature. To our knowledge this systematic evaluation has not been completed thus far.

Methods

A review of the literature was completed using the following search terms: McGill stabilization exercises, McGill Big Three, MGB3, low back pain (LBP), Stuart McGill, chronic low back pain (LBP), core stabilizing exercises. The PubMed, Ovid Medline, Embase and Google Scholar electronic databases were used. References of existing articles were inspected to identify additional relevant studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized control trials that involved an intervention with MGB3 core stabilization exercises for patients with chronic low back pain. The research included articles published during any period in full English text. Studies were critically reviewed by two authors EL and GG independently and collaboratively.

For the analysis, between group differences were calculated by using the absolute differences for various performance measures and patient reported pain and functional outcomes. For instance, if mean pain scores in the control group decreased from 8/10 to 4/10, this was considered to be a 40 percent improvement (not 50%), which was subsequently subtracted from the corresponding measure in the treatment group. Where range of motion was used, the total possible score was calculated using a maximum of 20 degrees of extension and 40 degrees of flexion, for a total range of motion of degrees [46]. Percentage improvement was calculated against degrees improvement divided by 60 degrees. One study provided mean scores using several graphs. [48] Percentage improvement for this study was therefore calculated from estimated scores. Finally, where multiple performance measures were used, the measure with a total possible maximum score was used. [3,43,47,48] A positive score represents an effect favoring the McGill approach for a given study. A trial reporting performance measures using covariate analysis was excluded from the analysis as the corresponding author was unable to provide mean scores. [3]

Results

In total, four randomized control studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. [3,43,47,48] 170 participants were recruited from the four studies with 23 lost to follow up. Participants ranged from 20 to 60 years of age. Plausible confounding variables including gender, age, weight and height were recorded in all studies, and the assessors were blinded to treatment allocation with the exception of Ghorbanpour et al. 2018. Ammar et al. 2011 recruited only postnatal female participants and Chan et al. 2020 recruited male military participants only.

Chan et al. 2020 provided 5 weeks of pre-trial passive pain treatment with heat and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS). Ammar 2012 provided heat to all participants, while Ammar et. al 2011 provided heat to the control group only. No studies used non-treatment control groups, and protocols for the prescribed exercises varied with respect to type of exercises, duration, and intensity of exercises for both groups. Furthermore, the McGill stabilization exercises were not uniform throughout each study as Ghorbanpour et. al 2012 and Chan et al. 2020 focused only on the MGB3, while Ammar 2012 and Ammar et. al 2011 employed McGill stabilization exercises beyond the MGB3. [3,47,48,43] Treatment outcomes were measured at 4 or 6 weeks depending on the trial, and no longer-term measures were assessed in any trial. [3,43,47,48]

Two studies, Ammar et al. 2011 and Ammar 2012 monitored compliance using patient reported logs and were the only studies that showed statistical differences for outcomes between groups. Ammar et. al 2011 insufficiently differentiated groups, and mean scores and standard deviations for outcomes were identical for one group suggesting a possibility of error in the results. Ghorbanpour et al 2018 appear to have errors when reporting mean difference which were adjusted for in our analysis. Chan et al. 2020 was the only study conducted with a therapist present for all sessions. The same study provided a power analysis to justify recruitment and accounted for dropouts in their analysis. When looking at the relative improvements between groups, pain, function and performance scores saw an improvement of <10% across the studies, with the exception of Chan et. al which saw an improvement of 15% for pain scores. Table 1 describes the specifics of the studies while Figure 2 details the comparative differences between studies on select outcome measures.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1: General Summary of Studies Included in Review
Figure 2:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 2: Bubble Graph Comparing Differences between Studies on Select Outcome Measures

Note: Bubble size also represents total trial size

Discussion

Core stability training continues to be widely employed in therapy of LBP and injury prevention. The goal of this training is to stabilize the lumbopelvic region in a neutral state when performing spine-loading tasks by re-educating postural core muscles such as the transverse abdominis, multifidi, and pelvic floor muscles. It is hypothesized that this will provide segmental stability and control of the lumbar spinal segments during activity. [49, 50, 51]

There have been multiple studies looking at various types of core strengthening programs on pain and disability with mixed results. [47] As described, the McGill approach is one type of core strengthening program that incorporates the abdominal bracing strategy to recruit high trunk muscle activity with low spinal loads on the spine. [51] This review of the available randomized controlled clinical trials employing this method in low back pain treatment showed low quality data with mixed statistical significance, and little to no clinical significance irrespective of the measure used or even when compared to baseline. Limitations of these trials are detailed in Table 2. Practical limitations of the review include the exclusion of background biomechanical and cohort studies of the McGill approach, as well as the inclusion of other core strengthening approaches. This can certainly be considered in the future given the limited quality of the data available. Further investigation could consider 1) further comparing McGill or other stabilization programs to other conventional physical therapies 2) looking at these treatments alongside other types of treatments of low back pain 3) longer duration studies with carefully selected patients and robust treatment protocols and 4) impact on resource healthcare utilization and care seeking.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2: Limitations of Trials Included in Review of McGill Approach for Low Back Pain Treatment

Conclusion

Currently there is limited data supporting the clinical benefit of the McGill approach for the treatment of low back pain based on the available randomized clinical trials. Further studies are required to verify the treatment efficacy prior to widespread adoption into clinical practice.

Disclaimer

The views expressed herein are those of the author and may not reflect those of the Canadian Armed Forces, Canadian Forces Health Services, the Department of National Defense or the Canadian Government.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Major Pauline Godsell and Captain Nicole Mahoney for their feedback and support on this project.

References

  1. ↵
    Paolucci T, Attanasi C, Cecchini W, Marazzi A, Capobianco SV, Santilli V. Chronic low back pain and postural rehabilitation exercise: a literature review. J Pain Res. 2018;12:95–107. Published 2018 Dec 20.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Clark S, Horton R. Low back pain: a major global challenge. Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2302.. Epub 2018 Mar 21. PMID: 29573869.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Ammar, T. A. (2012). McGill exercises versus conventional exercises in chronic low back pain. Life Sci J, 9(2), 393–7.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    Wang XQ, Zheng JJ, Yu ZW, Bi X, Lou SJ, Liu J, Cai B, Hua YH, Wu M, Wei ML, Shen HM, Chen Y, Pan YJ, Xu GH, Chen PJ. A meta-analysis of core stability exercise versus general exercise for chronic low back pain. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52082. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052082. Epub 2012 Dec 17. PMID: 23284879; PMCID: PMC3524111.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Akhtar MW, Karimi H, Gilani SA. Effectiveness of core stabilization exercises and routine exercise therapy in management of pain in chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2017;33(4):1002–1006. doi:10.12669/pjms.334.12664
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    Shipton EA. Physical Therapy Approaches in the Treatment of Low Back Pain. Pain Ther. 2018;7(2):127–137. doi:10.1007/s40122-018-0105-x
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Verhagen AP, Ostelo RW, Koes BW, van Tulder MW. Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2010 Apr;24(2):193–204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    van Tulder M, Malmivaara A, Esmail R, Koes B. Exercise therapy for low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Nov 1;25(21):2784–96.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Tomlinson G. Systematic review: strategies for using exercise therapy to improve outcomes in chronic low back pain. Ann Intern Med. 2005 May 3;142(9):776–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  10. ↵
    McGill, S. (2007). Low back disorders: Evidence-based prevention and rehabilitation. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
  11. ↵
    Coulombe BJ, Games KE, Neil ER, Eberman LE. Core Stability Exercise Versus General Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain. J Athl Train. 2017;52(1):71–72. doi:10.4085/1062-6050-51.11.16
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Wu A, March L, Zheng X, et al. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(6):299.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017 Feb 18;389(10070):736–747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9. Epub 2016 Oct 11. PMID: 27745712.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Vassilaki M, Hurwitz EL. Insights in public health: perspectives on pain in the low back and neck: global burden, epidemiology, and management. Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2014;73(4):122–126.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    Chou R. Low back pain (chronic). BMJ Clin Evid. 2010;2010:1116. Published 2010 Oct 8.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    Costa, L.d.C.M., Henschke, N., Maher, C.G. et al. Prognosis of chronic low back pain: design of an inception cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8, 11 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-11
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Stevans JM, Delitto A, Khoja SS, et al. Risk Factors Associated With Transition From Acute to Chronic Low Back Pain in US Patients Seeking Primary Care. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(2):e2037371.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    B. K. Kwon, D. M. Roffey, P. B. Bishop, S. Dagenais, E. K. Wai, Systematic review: occupational physical activity and low back pain, Occupational Medicine, Volume 61, Issue 8, December 2011, Pages 541–548
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Côté P. The Saskatchewan health and back pain survey. The prevalence of low back pain and related disability in Saskatchewan adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Sep 1;23(17):1860–6; discussion 1867.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    Thériault, François L., Diane Lu, and Robert A. Hawes. “Development and validation of a case-finding algorithm for neck and back pain in the Canadian Armed Forces using health administrative data.” Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health 5.2 (2019): 16–26.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Strauss BA,
    2. Whitehead J
    Thériault FL, Gabler K, Naicker K. Health and Lifestyle Information Survey of Canadian Armed Forces Personnel 2013/2014 – Regular Force Report. In: Strauss BA, Whitehead J, editors. Ottawa: Department of National Defence; 2016. Canadian Forces Health Services Group. Surgeon General’s Integrated Health Strategy – 2017. Ottawa: Department of National Defence; 2017
  22. ↵
    Knezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP. Low back pain. Lancet. 2021 Jul 3;398(10294):78–92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00733-9. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Allegri M, Montella S, Salici F, et al. Mechanisms of low back pain: a guide for diagnosis and therapy. F1000Res. 2016;5:F1000 Faculty Rev-1530. Published 2016 Jun 28.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    Deyo, Richard A, M.D., M.P.H., & Weinstein, J. N. D.O. (2001). Low back pain. The New England Journal of Medicine, 344(5), 363–370.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  25. ↵
    Pergolizzi, J.V., LeQuang, J.A. Rehabilitation for Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review for Managing Pain and Improving Function in Acute and Chronic Conditions. Pain Ther 9, 83–96 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    Casiano VE, Dydyk AM, Varacallo M. Back Pain. [Updated 2021 Jul 18]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538173/
  27. ↵
    Valat JP, Goupille P, Védere V. Low back pain: risk factors for chronicity. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1997 Mar;64(3):189–94.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    Goubert, L., Crombez, G., & De Bourdeaudhuij, I. (2004). Low back pain, disability and back pain myths in a community sample: prevalence and interrelationships. European journal of pain, 8(4), 385–394.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Gore M, Sadosky A, Stacey BR, Tai KS, Leslie D. The burden of chronic low back pain: clinical comorbidities, treatment patterns, and health care costs in usual care settings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 15;37(11):E668–77.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    Kregel J, Meeus M, Malfliet A, Dolphens M, Danneels L, Nijs J, Cagnie B. Structural and functional brain abnormalities in chronic low back pain: A systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Oct;45(2):229–37.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Thomas S. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. BMJ. 2006;332(7555):1430–1434. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7555.1430
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Stuber, K. J., Bruno, P., Sajko, S., & Hayden, J. A. (2014). Core stability exercises for low back pain in athletes: a systematic review of the literature. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 24(6), 448–456.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Wheeler K, Ciol MA. Physician variation in diagnostic testing for low back pain. Who you see is what you get. Arthritis Rheum. 1994 Jan;37(1):15–22. doi: 10.1002/art.1780370104. PMID: 8129759.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Loeser JD, Bush T, Waddell G. An international comparison of back surgery rates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jun 1;19(11):1201–6.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    Akodu, A. K., Tella, B. A., & Olujobi, O. D. (2015). Effect of stabilization exercise on pain and quality of life of patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. African Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, 7(1-2), 7–11.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    Hwangbo G, Lee CW, Kim SG, Kim HS. The effects of trunk stability exercise and a combined exercise program on pain, flexibility, and static balance in chronic low back pain patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Apr;27(4):1153–5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1153. Epub 2015 Apr 30. PMID: 25995577; PMCID: PMC4433998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Suh JH, Kim H, Jung GP, Ko JY, Ryu JS. The effect of lumbar stabilization and walking exercises on chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(26):e16173.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    Nava-Bringas TI, Romero-Fierro LO, Trani-Chagoya YP, Macías-Hernández SI, García-Guerrero E, Hernández-López M, Roberto CZ. Stabilization Exercises Versus Flexion Exercises in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther. 2021 Aug 1;101(8):pzab108. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab108. PMID: 33792726.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Akuthota V, Ferreiro A, Moore T, et al: Core stability exercise principles. Curr Sports Med Rep, 2008, 7: 39–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    McGill SM: Stability: from biomechanical concept to chiropractic practice. J Can Chiropr Assoc, 1999, 43: 75–88.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, et al: Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2005, 86: 1753–1762.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  42. ↵
    McGill SM: Low back stability: from formal description to issues for performance and rehabilitation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev, 2001, 29: 26–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Ghorbanpour, A., Azghani, M. R., Taghipour, M., Salahzadeh, Z., Ghaderi, F., & Oskouei, A. E. (2018). Effects of McGill stabilization exercises and conventional physiotherapy on pain, functional disability and active back range of motion in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. Journal of physical therapy science, 30(4), 481–485.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    Kavcic, N., Grenier, S., & McGill, S. M. (2004). Quantifying tissue loads and spine stability while performing commonly prescribed low back stabilization exercises. Spine, 29(20), 2319–2329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  45. ↵
    McGill MS. Ultimate Back Fitness and Performance. 4thed. Waterloo; Canada: Backfit pro Inc.; 2009.
  46. ↵
    Magee, JD. Orthopedic Physical Assessment. 5thed. St. Louis, MS.: Saunders Elsevier; 2008: 533.
  47. ↵
    Ammar, T. A., Mitchell, K., & Saleh, A. (2011). Stabilization exercises in postnatal low back pain. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy, 5(1). https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/5466059/indian-journal-of-physiotherapy-and-occupational-therapy
  48. ↵
    Chan, E. W. M., Nadzalan, A., Othman, Z., Hafiz, E., & Hamid, M. S. (2020). The Short-Term Effects of Progressive vs Conventional Core Stability Exercise in Rehabilitation of Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain. Sains Malaysiana, 49(10), 2527–2537.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    Clark, M., Hoogenboom, B.J. & Bennet, J.I. 2011. Establishing core stability in rehabilitation. In Rehabilitation Techniques for Sports Medicine and Athletic Training, edited by Prentice, W.E. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 98–121.
  50. ↵
    Brukner, P. & Khan, K. 2007. Core stability. In Clinical Sports Medicine, edited by Brukner, P. & Khan, K. Sydney: McGraw-Hill. pp. 158–173.
  51. ↵
    McGill, S.M. & Karpowicz, A. 2009. Exercises for spine stabilization: Motion/motor patterns, stability progressions, and clinical technique. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 90(1): 118–126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. Gordon R, Bloxham S. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Exercise and Physical Activity on Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain. Healthcare (Basel). 2016;4(2):22. Published 2016 Apr 25.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 26, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The McGill Approach to Core Stabilization in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
The McGill Approach to Core Stabilization in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review
Erica Laurin, Amir Minerbi, LCol Markus Besemann, Captain Isabel Courchesne, Gaurav Gupta
medRxiv 2022.01.21.22269311; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.21.22269311
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
The McGill Approach to Core Stabilization in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review
Erica Laurin, Amir Minerbi, LCol Markus Besemann, Captain Isabel Courchesne, Gaurav Gupta
medRxiv 2022.01.21.22269311; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.21.22269311

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (230)
  • Allergy and Immunology (507)
  • Anesthesia (111)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1254)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (283)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (537)
  • Epidemiology (10043)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2477)
  • Geriatric Medicine (239)
  • Health Economics (482)
  • Health Informatics (1650)
  • Health Policy (756)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (638)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11886)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (255)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (269)
  • Neurology (2298)
  • Nursing (140)
  • Nutrition (354)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (458)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1255)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (326)
  • Pediatrics (736)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2291)
  • Public and Global Health (4849)
  • Radiology and Imaging (844)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (493)
  • Respiratory Medicine (654)
  • Rheumatology (288)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (271)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (130)
  • Urology (100)