“I feel like my body is broken”: Exploring the experiences of people living with long COVID

Introduction

The acute impact of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection varies widely, with some individuals experiencing no symptoms and others experiencing adverse effects that vary from mild to critical severity [1,2]. Diverse responses to COVID-19 persist beyond the initial presentation, with a subset of the population experiencing complicated, disconcerting, prolonged illness [3], widely known as long COVID [4] (also referred to as post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection). Though much remains unknown about long COVID, it is characterized by multiorgan impairments that span respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, dermatological, and gastrointestinal systems [5]. Commonly reported symptoms include fatigue, shortness of breath, dry cough, cognitive impairment, headache, heart palpitations, chest tightness, and dizziness [6–8]. Symptoms can co-occur, vary in severity, and be cyclical or episodic in nature [9–11]. Initially, the prevalence and seriousness of chronic symptoms after COVID-19 were underrecognized, contested, or dismissed [12,13], and much of the early research on long COVID was led by patients [14]. Researchers and healthcare providers worldwide now recognize the significant burden associated with long COVID [15,16].

Nevertheless, there is still a relatively poor understanding of the lived experience of long COVID. For example, much of the evidence describing long COVID has come from individuals who were hospitalized for COVID-19 [17–21] or excluded those without a laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infection, despite numerous reasons why this may not have been accessible [22]. Further, the closed-ended questionnaires used within surveys [14,23] may have failed to collect important aspects of the patient voice. Indeed, despite a highly engaged patient population whose activism collectively made long COVID’s complex symptomatology visible [4,14], few studies have included the patient perspective through qualitative approaches. Of the studies that have used qualitative approaches [24–27], the patient experience has been explored via interview and focus group methodologies with individuals affected by long COVID residing in the United Kingdom. In these studies, patients offer detailed accounts of navigating skepticism from the healthcare system and their social networks, the challenges of managing inconspicuous symptoms, the inability to perform physical activity or activities of daily living, and the importance of seeking refuge and information from similar others [24–27]. However, no studies have used open-ended survey items as a lower burden approach to gathering in-depth information, nor captured experiences of individuals with long COVID residing outside of the United Kingdom. Although interviews and focus groups can enable researchers to probe and further explore patients’ lived experiences, in the case of long COVID, such emotionally, socially, and time-consuming methods could preclude those with the most severe symptoms from participating.

Therefore, using data from a larger online survey conducted in 2021, the specific objective of this sub-study was to better understand and explore individuals’ experiences with long COVID and commonly reported symptoms using qualitative data collected from open-ended survey items.

Methods

The qualitative data collected, analyzed, and reported herein were collected as part of a larger observational study using an online survey [8], which was approved by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board (REB21-0159). Initially, the qualitative data were collected to enable participants to qualify or elaborate on their closed-ended responses, with planned content analysis if data were sufficient. However, upon exporting the qualitative data, it became apparent that rich and important insights were offered and that in-depth reflexive thematic analysis [28] of this survey data [29] was warranted. A pragmatic approach [30] and constructivist paradigm [31] was adopted, wherein participants’ voices were centred and reality was viewed as varied and socially created.

Results

Of the 213 participants who were included in the larger study, 169 (79%) provided responses to the open-ended items and were included herein. Of note, most (n=105; 62%) provided responses to three or more of the open-ended items. The remaining (n=64; 38%) responded to one or two open-ended items.

Discussion

The purpose of this sub-study was to better understand and explore individuals’ experiences with long COVID and commonly reported symptoms using qualitative data collected from open-ended survey items contained within a larger survey [8]. Findings support and extend prior research and underscore the complex, highly variable, and distressing nature of long COVID across a large number of participants from predominantly developed countries. Results also align with literature capturing the vexing experience of navigating an ‘invisible’ and poorly understood illness that disrupts nearly all aspects of daily living [24–27]. These findings contribute to a growing evidence base calling for continued efforts to better understand and improve care for individuals with long COVID.

Participants in this sample described their ‘new’ long COVID body as being discordant with their physical, occupational, and social obligations. This dissonance manifested as feelings of deep loss, sadness, and frustration. Mourning over one’s pre-illness identity and ability to participate in roles, responsibilities, and leisure pursuits has been reported previously with individuals affected by long COVID [25] and other chronic conditions, including fibromyalgia and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) [35–38]. Beyond sharing sentiments of loss, participants in this study also offered insights into how they have altered their day-to-day life to account for their reduced capacities and possible continued deterioration. For example, some participants described sacrificing their social activities to keep up at work; others had to leave work altogether or were fearful of termination; whereas others chose to engage in one task per day or to take breaks after every activity. These findings align with the recent conceptualization of long COVID as characterized by health-related challenges or episodic disability [39,40]. Looking ahead, exploring if and how individuals adapt to their post-illness body will be necessary. For example, post-exertional malaise can greatly limit the ability to engage in activities that could otherwise help prevent low mood and feelings of isolation [41]. When combined with severe functional limitations and the burden of educating others, there can be serious adverse impacts on mental health [41,42]. A deeper exploration of common symptoms, including post-exertional malaise, and their physical and psychological consequences, could disentangle the effects of long COVID from the secondary impacts on mental health - ultimately informing interventions and supportive care strategies.

There were multiple and varied ways participants described self-managing their condition, from consuming medical information and advocating for themselves to adhering to treatments that do not always offer relief. Participants also shared the additional challenge they faced in self-managing their condition within a system that challenged or contested their diagnosis. This sentiment of navigating one’s condition amidst doubts about authenticity has been reported in individuals with ME/CFS [43–47]. ME/CFS can occur after an infectious illness such as mononucleosis [48], but it remains a highly stigmatized health condition where patients are vulnerable to epistemic injustice in healthcare encounters [45]. The feelings of dismissal from healthcare providers expressed by participants in this sample, the conceptual ambiguity of both ME/CFS and long COVID, and the nature of symptoms which are numerous and hard to describe, may result in low credibility being given to the patient testimonial [45]. The recent recognition of long COVID as a real outcome of COVID-19 infection (for example, through being given a clinical case definition by the World Health Organization [32]) may help further legitimize the illness. Considering that long COVID is likely to lead to ME/CFS for some patients [49], an important next step is educating primary healthcare providers, who are the front line for patients, to recognize and validate their patients. Beyond this, equipping healthcare providers with evidence-based guidelines and referral pathways is necessary to better support a growing patient population as they adapt to long COVID.

However, educating primary healthcare providers with evidence-based guidelines and referral pathways may not be enough. There is a critical need to identify appropriate interventions and treatments, which may be best accomplished by including patients as partners in the development and evaluation of potential interventions and treatments. Anecdotally (and in the authors’ clinical experience), some individuals with long COVID are responding well to self-management, including activity pacing over extended time periods. Given that typical rehabilitation timeframes are often 2-3 months, and existing rehabilitation approaches (such as pulmonary rehabilitation) are unlikely to be suitable for the majority of people with long COVID because there are distinct clinical presentations [50], novel approaches may be necessary. For example, multidisciplinary, tailored interventions that leverage peer support may be most effective and should adhere to the recommended quality standards of being evidence-based, accessible and of minimal burden [26,27]. Occupational therapists, physiotherapists, and other rehabilitation specialists who have expertise and experience working with people who have been discredited in the past (e.g., fibromyalgia, ME/CFS or other chronic conditions resulting in drastically changed capacity or disability) may be best placed to work with patients to design appropriate and effective interventions and treatments. Furthermore, appropriate training of all professionals working with people with long COVID may enhance continuity of care and offer prolonged support for this cohort (as opposed to the often disconnected care pathways). Engaging with patients and learning from their experiences represents a valuable first step towards improving training and care.

Conclusion

Given the uncertain nature of long COVID, exploring individuals’ lived experience is paramount. Findings reiterate that long COVID is complex and distressing for those affected. The varied relapsing-remitting symptoms, unknown prognosis and deep sense of loss over one’s prior identity suggest interventions are needed to support this population. Further, results underscore the challenges individuals affected by long COVID face when advocating for themselves and adapting to their illness during the pandemic and amidst healthcare systems that are understaffed, at times disbelieving or unarmed (as of yet) with comprehensive treatment guidelines. More research is needed to identify and address the pathophysiology, capture the consequences of long COVID, implement strategies to support those affected, and ultimately better help this cohort navigate the process of adapting to long COVID.

Funding

This study was not funded. However, AW was supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fellowship and an Alberta Innovates Health Solutions Fellowship during data analysis and manuscript preparation. RT was supported by the O’Brien Institute of Public Health and Ohlson Research Initiative, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary and Canadian Institutes of Health Research Fellowship during this study. JGW was supported by the Hotchkiss Brain Institute and the Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary. NCR was funded by the Canadian Cancer Society and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

JDM is a physiotherapist and owner of Breath Well Physio (Alberta, Canada) and has been treating people living with long COVID in private practice since July 2020. JDM and RT run a free virtual program for people living with long COVID in Alberta, Canada, in collaboration with Synaptic Health (Registered Charity No. 830838280RR001). JDM delivered a paid course for rehabilitation professionals working with people with long COVID in April 2021. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to disclose.

CRediT author statement

Amanda Wurz: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing - original draft. Jessica DeMars: Conceptualization, Writing - review and editing.

Kelli Franklin: Patient partner (provided guidance based on the lived experience of long COVID), Validation, Writing - review and editing.

S. Nicole Culos-Reed: Writing - review and editing.

James G. Wrightson: Conceptualization, Writing - review and editing.

Rosie Twomey: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Data curation, Writing - review and editing, Project administration.