ABSTRACT
The surgical pathology workflow currently adopted in the clinic uses staining to reveal tissue architecture within thin sections. A trained pathologist then conducts a visual examination of these slices and, as the investigation is based on an empirical assessment, a certain amount of subjectivity is unavoidable. Furthermore, the reliance on such external contrast agents like hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), albeit a well-established method, makes it difficult to standardize color balance, staining strength, and imaging conditions, hindering automated computational analysis. In response to these challenges, we applied spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM), a label-free method that generates contrast based on the intrinsic tissue refractive index signatures. Thus, we reduce human bias and make the image data comparable across instruments and clinics. We applied a Mask R-CNN deep learning algorithm to the SLIM data to achieve an automated colorectal cancer screening procedure, i.e., classifying normal vs. cancer specimens. Our results obtained on a tissue microarray consisting of specimens from 132 patients, resulted in 91% accuracy for gland detection, 99.71% accuracy in gland-level classification, and 97% accuracy in core-level classification. A SLIM tissue scanner accompanied by an application-specific deep learning algorithm may become a valuable clinical tool, enabling faster and more accurate assessment by the pathologist.
Competing Interest Statement
G.P. has a financial interest in Phi Optics, Inc., a company that commercializes quantitative phase imaging technology for materials and life science applications.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by the National Science Foundation (Grant Nos. 0939511, R01 GM129709, R01 CA238191, and R43GM133280-01).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The tissue collection for this manuscript was performed in accordance with the procedures approved by the Institutional Review Board at UIC (IRB Protocol No. 2004-0317) . The studies made for this manuscript followed the protocols outlined in the procedures approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (IRB Protocol No. 13900).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The tissue collection for this manuscript was performed in accordance with the procedures approved by the Institutional Review Board at UIC (IRB Protocol No. 2004-0317) .