Abstract
Machine learning is becoming increasingly promi- nent in healthcare. Although its benefits are clear, growing attention is being given to how machine learning may exacerbate existing biases and disparities. In this study, we introduce an adversarial training framework that is capable of mitigating biases that may have been acquired through data collection or magnified during model development. For example, if one class is over-presented or errors/inconsistencies in practice are reflected in the training data, then a model can be biased by these. To evaluate our adversarial training framework, we used the statistical definition of equalized odds. We evaluated our model for the task of rapidly predicting COVID-19 for patients presenting to hospital emergency departments, and aimed to mitigate regional (hospital) and ethnic biases present. We trained our framework on a large, real-world COVID-19 dataset and demonstrated that adversarial training demonstrably improves outcome fairness (with respect to equalized odds), while still achieving clinically-effective screening performances (NPV>0.98). We compared our method to the benchmark set by related previous work, and performed prospective and external validation on four independent hospital cohorts. Our method can be generalized to any outcomes, models, and definitions of fairness.
Competing Interest Statement
DAC reports personal fees from Oxford University Innovation, personal fees from BioBeats, personal fees from Sensyne Health, outside the submitted work. No other authors report any conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust/University of Oxford Medical & Life Sciences Translational Fund (Award: 0009350) and the Oxford National Institute of Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Campus (BRC). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript. JY is a Marie Sklodowska-Curie Fellow, under the European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement: 955681, MOIRA). AS is an NIHR Academic Clinical Fellow (Award: ACF-2020-13-015). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, NIHR, EU H2020 programme, or the Wellcome Trust.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS) approval via the national oversight/regulatory body, the Health Research Authority (HRA), has been granted for this work (IRAS ID: 281832).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data from OUH studied here are available from the Infections in Oxfordshire Research Database (https://oxfordbrc.nihr.ac.uk/research-themesoverview/antimicrobial- resistance-and-modernising-microbiology/infections-inoxfordshire- research-database-iord/), subject to an application meeting the ethical and governance requirements of the Database. Data from UHB, PUH and BH are available on reasonable request to the respective trusts, subject to HRA requirements. Code and supplementary information for this paper are available online alongside publication.
