Abstract
Background and objectives Professional and career enhancing opportunities are essential for developing skills required for a successful career in medicine. Research to date has mainly focused on the extent to which medical schools prepare students for clinical work as junior doctors. However, there remains a need to ascertain how students prepare for their career and what facilitates or hinders learning regarding careers in medicine. The purpose of the XTRA study is to examine career readiness of medical students at UK universities and the support they receive during their studies regarding career planning.
Methods The eXploring medical sTudents’ caReer reAdiness (XTRA) study is a national cross sectional study of all medical students enrolled at a UK medical school. Data collection will occur via a secure online survey designed as a training need analysis based on the principles of Super’s theory (Super, 1953) of career development. A snowball sampling strategy will be used to recruit participants via social media and networks. Results will be analysed using quantitative analysis and thematic analysis to identify themes in qualitative responses. The primary outcome is to understand the perspective of current medical students on how well prepared they are about entering their careers in healthcare.
Conclusions We anticipate that findings from this study will help identify career readiness of medical students to facilitate the development of career development programmes and resources to ensure medical students are well equipped for their future careers.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This project has been approved by the research committee in the School of Medicine at Cardiff University (Reference: SMREC 21/86).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Contact information Amanda Godoi (godoia{at}cardiff.ac.uk); Mia McDade-Kumar (mia.mcdade-kumar{at}nhs.net); Farazi Virk (f.virk1{at}uni.bsms.ac.uk); Charlotte Casteleyn (charlotte.casteleyn.18{at}ucl.ac.uk); Omar Marei (omarayman176{at}gmail.com); Ting Yang (yangt12{at}cardiff.ac.uk); Ahmed Moussa (ahmedmymoussa{at}gmail.com); Kashif Aman (kaman{at}newvision.ge); Matthew H V Byrne (mhvbyrne{at}gmail.com); Michal Tombs (tombsm2{at}cardiff.ac.uk);
Sources of support: Nil
Conflicts of interests: None declared
Authorship AG and MT were responsible for conceptualisation. AG, FV, CC, TY, MM, KA, AM were responsible for writing the protocol and first draft. All authors were responsible for writing the second draft. AG, MT and MHVB were responsible for study design. MM, CC and FV were responsible for leading the data collection. All authors were responsible for data collection. The contributions from PB, ST and KB were solely data collection in accordance with collaborative authorship criteria. All authors were responsible for revisions. MT was responsible for supervision.
Study type: Cross-sectional questionnaire-based study.
Ethical considerations This study is conducted by Cardiff University, and has been reviewed and approved by the Cardiff University Research Ethics Committee (Reference: SMREC 21/86).
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
