Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study

View ORCID ProfileChristopher Ryan King, View ORCID ProfileAyanna Shambe, Joanna Abraham
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.08.22268939
Christopher Ryan King
1Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christopher Ryan King
  • For correspondence: christopherking@wustl.edu
Ayanna Shambe
1Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ayanna Shambe
Joanna Abraham
1Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, United States of America
2Institute for Informatics Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, Missouri, United States of America
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objective Situational awareness and anticipatory guidance for nurses receiving a patient after surgery are key to patient safety. Little work has defined the role of artificial intelligence (AI) to support these functions during nursing handoff communication or patient assessment. We used interviews and direct observations to better understand how AI could work in this context.

Materials and Methods 58 handoffs were observed of patients entering and leaving the post- anesthesia care unit at a single center. 11 nurses participated in semi-structured interviews. Mixed inductive-deductive thematic analysis extracted major themes and subthemes around roles for AI supporting postoperative nursing.

Results Four themes emerged from the interviews: (1) Nurse understanding of patient condition guides care decisions, (2) Handoffs are important to nurse situational awareness; problem focus and information transfer may be improved by AI, (3) AI may augment nurse care decision making and team communication, (4) User experience and information overload are likely barriers to using AI. Key subthemes included that AI-identified problems would be discussed at handoff and team communications, that AI-estimated elevated risks would trigger patient re- evaluation, and that AI-identified important data may be a valuable addition to nursing assessment.

Discussion and Conclusion Most research on postoperative handoff communication relies on structured checklists. Our results suggest that properly designed AI tools might facilitate postoperative handoff communication for nurses by identifying elevated risks faced by a specific patient, triggering discussion on those topics.

LAY SUMMARY Nurses caring for patients after surgery make many decisions about what complications to look for and how to treat issues that arise. They rely on handoffs from prior providers to understand the patient’s background, events, and plans so far. We observed nurse handoffs after surgery where operating room nurses transfer information and their care responsibility to postoperative unit nurses to ensure care continuity. We also interviewed nurses to ask if and how artificial intelligence (AI) might help them focus their handoff communication on likely problems and generally understand the patient. Our participants stated that if AI identified likely issues, they would discuss those topics in handoff, communicate about those problems with physicians, and modify their monitoring and treatment to the level of risk faced by the patient. This finding runs against most research on improving communication, which focuses on checklists of topics to discuss. Most uses of AI for nurses focus on making specific to-do recommendations and documentation reminders and search, but we find that nurses would benefit from AI which focuses more on their understanding of the patient’s condition. These findings have major implications for the application of AI support for nurses.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number KL2 TR002346 (PI: Victoria J. Fraser). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Washington University in St Louis Human Research Protection Office (#201812137 and #202009066)

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Data are not publicly shared. To encourage frank discussion of their workplace and patient care, participants were offered that their transcripts would not be shared.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 10, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study
Christopher Ryan King, Ayanna Shambe, Joanna Abraham
medRxiv 2022.01.08.22268939; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.08.22268939
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Potential uses of AI for perioperative nursing handoffs: a qualitative study
Christopher Ryan King, Ayanna Shambe, Joanna Abraham
medRxiv 2022.01.08.22268939; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.08.22268939

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (164)
  • Allergy and Immunology (417)
  • Anesthesia (93)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (867)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (159)
  • Dermatology (98)
  • Emergency Medicine (251)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (398)
  • Epidemiology (8597)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (391)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1775)
  • Geriatric Medicine (170)
  • Health Economics (376)
  • Health Informatics (1252)
  • Health Policy (625)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (472)
  • Hematology (198)
  • HIV/AIDS (380)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10355)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (554)
  • Medical Education (193)
  • Medical Ethics (51)
  • Nephrology (214)
  • Neurology (1692)
  • Nursing (97)
  • Nutrition (252)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (330)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (451)
  • Oncology (934)
  • Ophthalmology (265)
  • Orthopedics (104)
  • Otolaryngology (172)
  • Pain Medicine (115)
  • Palliative Medicine (40)
  • Pathology (256)
  • Pediatrics (541)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (257)
  • Primary Care Research (210)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1788)
  • Public and Global Health (3877)
  • Radiology and Imaging (629)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (324)
  • Respiratory Medicine (525)
  • Rheumatology (208)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (171)
  • Sports Medicine (159)
  • Surgery (191)
  • Toxicology (36)
  • Transplantation (101)
  • Urology (76)