Modeling the USA Winter 2021 CoVID-19 Resurgence
================================================

* Genghmun Eng

## Abstract

The current USA 2021 CoVID-19 Winter Resurgence is modeled here with the same function used for analyzing prior USA CoVID-19 waves: ![Formula][1]</img>  Here, *N*(*t*) gives the total number of CoVID-19 cases above the previous baseline, and *t**R* sets the initial *t**dbl* = *t**R* (ln 2) pandemic *t**dbl* doubling time. Larger *α**S* values indicate that uninfected people are improving their pandemic mitigation efforts, such as *Social Distancing* and *vaccinations* ; while *δ*** *>* 0 accelerates the post-peak ![Graphic][2]</img> *tail-off*, and is empirically associated with *mask-wearing*. The pandemic wave end is when *N*(*t*) no longer increases.

The USA Summer 2021 resurgence results from our prior *medrxiv*.*org* preprints* were used as a baseline. By 11/15/2021, an additional ![Graphic][3]</img> cases above baseline were found, signaling the USA Winter 2021 resurgence. This CoVID-19 wave is still in its *initial* stages. Presently, our analysis indicates that this CoVID-19 wave can infect virtually all susceptible persons; just like the *initial* stage of the USA Summer 2021 resurgence. Data up through 12/30/2021 gives these paremeter values: ![Formula][4]</img>  These values are identical to the prior 2020 USA Winter Resurgence results. Also, the ![Graphic][5]</img> and the ![Graphic][6]</img> values are similar. However, while the Winter 2020 Resurgence showed a significant *mask-wearing* effect ![Graphic][7]</img>, this *initial* USA Winter 2021 Resurgence shows practically no *mask-wearing* effects ![Graphic][8]</img>. If *mask-wearing* were to quickly rise to the Winter 2020 levels, it would give these projected totals: ![Formula][9]</img>  More robust *mask-wearing* and enhanced *Social Distancing* measures could further reduce these values (*with 3 Figures*).

## 1 Introduction

Each new USA CoVID-19 wave usually starts with a sharp rise in the total number *N*(*t*) of new cases. The time evolution for each of these waves has been successfully modeled**1–6** using this basic function for *N*(*t*): ![Formula][10]</img>  Equation [1.1] represents the USA Winter 2021 CoVID-19 Resurgence cases above a baseline that is set by the USA Summer 2021 Resurgence from our prior *medrxiv*.*org* preprints**5–6**. The standard **SEIR** (**S**usceptible, **E**xposed, **I**nfected, and **R**ecovered or Removed) epidemiology models all start with an exponential growth (*R**o* *>* 1) or decay (*R**o* *<* 1): ![Formula][11]</img>  ![Formula][12]</img>  ![Formula][13]</img>  where *t**R* *>* 0 sets the initial growth rate, and *t**dbl* sets the initial *N*(*t*) doubling-time. Virtually all **SEIR** models are *local* models, with *R**o* representing the average number of people who will become infected by an ailing person during the course of their illness.

Given a total population of *N**ALL*, the *uninfected population U*(*t*) is: ![Formula][14]</img>  Using Eq. [1.1] implicitly assumes that *N*(*t*) *<< N**ALL* for all times of interest, so that pandemic saturation effects can be ignored. In general, **SEIR** models do not explicitly consider what the *U*(*t*) *uninfected population* may be doing in response to the pandemic, prior to becoming infected. In contrast, Eq. [1.1] was developed as a *non-local* extension of **SEIR** models, to explicitly take into account what the *uninfected population*, as a whole, is doing to mitigate pandemic spread.

Since Eq. [1.1] is empirically based, it does not predict when each new CoVID-19 wave will start, or what biological and social circumstances are causing the new wave. As a result, the *t* = 0 point for each wave is usually set by when the resurgence is first easily identified, with *N*(*t* = 0) = *N**o* being the number of cases above baseline at that time. But once the CoVID-19 wave becomes established, Eq. [1.1] appears to successfully predict its time evolution.

As given in our prior preprints**1–6**, the parameter *α**S* measures the combined effect of virtually all large-scale pandemic mitigation efforts. These include *Social Distancing* requirements, such as minimum separation distances and decreased allowable occupancy; along with lockdowns, “stay at home” orders, school closures, and restrictions on business operations; as well as the impact of large-scale vaccination efforts. The *δ**o* *>* 0 parameter accelerates the post-peak ![Graphic][15]</img> *tail-off*, and our prior work**3–6** shows that it is empirically associated with *mask-wearing*.

The calculated end for each pandemic wave occurs when *N*(*t*) in Eq. [1.1] for the total number of cases first stops increasing, which makes the final stages of calculated post-peak ![Graphic][16]</img> *tail-off* inaccurate. However, the pandemic wave is substantially over by then, assuming that no follow-on resurgence occurs.

## 2 The USA Winter 2021 Resurgence

Our CoVID-19 modeling using the same few parameters has been successful at predicting the time evolution of each prior USA CoVID-19 wave**1–6**. This result shows that the **response** of the *U*(*t*) *uninfected population* was similar for each wave, even if different dominating factors drove each new resurgence.

Deviations of ∼107, 000 extra cases above the USA Summer 2021 baseline were observed by 11/15/2021. Thus, the USA is now in the *initial* stages of a Winter 2021 resurgence, as shown in *Figure 1*. Our calculations indicate that this CoVID-19 wave presently can infect virtually all susceptible people; a result that is similar to the *initial* stage of the USA Summer 2021 wave**5**.

![Figure 1](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/01/07/2022.01.06.22268868/F1.medium.gif)

[Figure 1](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/07/2022.01.06.22268868/F1)

Figure 1 The USA CoVID-19 Winter 2021 Resurgence, By Itself.

In addition, two of the three Eq. [1.1] parameter values, as determined using the data up through 12/30/2021, were found to be identical to the 2020 USA Winter Resurgence values as follows: ![Formula][17]</img>  ![Formula][18]</img>  Both CoVID-19 Winter Resurgences also have similar *N**o* values: ![Formula][19]</img>  ![Formula][20]</img>  indicating that both waves started similarly. However, the Winter 2020 Resurgence was associated with a non-negligible amount of *mask-wearing*, as measured by *δ**o* in Eq. [1.1]. In contrast, this *initial* stage of the USA Winter 2021 wave is associated with having virtually no *mask-wearing* effects: ![Formula][21]</img>  ![Formula][22]</img>  In *Figure 2*, the {*N**o*; *t**R*; *α**S*; *δ**o*} parameter values for this Winter 2021 Resurgence are compared to each of the prior USA CoVID-19 waves. If *mask-wearing* were now to quickly rise to the Winter 2020 levels, without changing the other Winter 2021 Resurgence parameters, the total number of projected USA CoVID-19 cases would be: ![Formula][23]</img>  ![Formula][24]</img>  ![Formula][25]</img> 

![Figure 2](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/01/07/2022.01.06.22268868/F2.medium.gif)

[Figure 2](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/07/2022.01.06.22268868/F2)

Figure 2 Summary of CoVID-19 Model and Parameter Values.

Without *mask-wearing* [*δ**o* *≈* 0], the 3*/*21*/*2022 projection would change to: ![Formula][26]</img>  ![Formula][27]</img>  with the calculated *N*(*t*) for [3*/*21*/*2024] substantially exceeding the *N**ALL* total US population. At that point the Eq. [1.1] assumption that *N**ALL* is large enough so that *N*(*t*) *<< N**ALL* for all times of interest, would no longer be valid. The USA would be in a pandemic saturation stage, where practically everybody is or was infected.

*Figure 3* shows our model predictions vs CoVID-19 data for the entire pandemic, from March 2020 through January 2022. Whenever the pandemic appeared to be beaten down, restrictions were relaxed, CoVID-19 cases increased, new CoVID-19 variants appeared, and the pandemic rose up again, almost with every season.

![Figure 3](http://medrxiv.org/https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2022/01/07/2022.01.06.22268868/F3.medium.gif)

[Figure 3](http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/07/2022.01.06.22268868/F3)

Figure 3 USA CoVID-19 Totals: 3/21/2020 through 12/30/2021.

The daily number of new cases *dN*(*t*) */ dt* in *Figure 3* has peaks for the initial Spring 2020 pandemic; a Summer 2020 resurgence; the long Winter 2020 Resurgence; a small uptick in Spring 2021; the USA Summer 2021 Resurgence; and now the USA Winter 2021 Resurgence.

In addition, *Figure 3* shows Winter 2021 Resurgence projections for two different *δ**o*-values. One projection is the best datafit to date (12/30/2021), and uses *δ**o* ≤ 0.001 × 10−3 */ day*. The other projection is how the Winter 2021 Resurgence would progress, if *δ**o* were to suddenly increase to the prior Winter 2020 Resurgence value of *δ**o* = 1.748 × 10−3 */ day*.

## 3 Summary

It is January 2022, and the USA is in the midst of the *initial stages* of a CoVID-19 Winter 2021 Resurgence. Using the USA CoVID-19 Summer 2021 Resurgence as a baseline**5–6**, the latest CoVID-19 wave was modeled using: ![Formula][28]</img>  with those results shown in *Figure 1*. This function was used to analyze each previous USA CoVID-19 wave**1–6**. Since the same few parameters successfully apply to all these USA CoVID-19 waves, with only different *t* = 0 starting points and {*N**o*; *t**R*; *α**S*; *δ**o*} parameter values allowed, it shows that the **response** of the *U*(*t*) *uninfected population* has been similar for each CoVID-19 wave, even if different factors were driving each new resurgence.

This effect is best seen by comparing the parameters derived for this *initial stage* of the USA CoVID-19 Winter 2021 Resurgence to the prior USA CoVID-19 Winter 2020 Resurgence, as shown in *Figure 2*. Both have similar {*N**o*; *t**R*; *α**S*} parameter values, indicating the USA population is in a similar position with respect to CoVID-19 in both cases. No doubt, the large number of Winter 2021 CoVID-19 Resurgence cases is being driven by infections from the most recent *Omicron* CoVID-19 variant.

However, back on Jan. 7, 2021, during the Winter 2020 Resurgence, only about ∼ 3% of the USA population had received any vaccinations, with only ∼0.3% being fully vaccinated. At that time, the *U*(*t*) *uninfected population* was substantially unvaccinated. In contrast, by Jan. 2022, a substantial fraction of the *U*(*t*) *uninfected population* was considered fully vaccinated.

Given the known capacity for the *Omicron* CoVID-19 variant to infect *fully vaccinated* persons, the similarity in the {*N**o*; *t**R*; *α**S*} parameters between these two USA Winter Resurgences, shows that the USA *vaccinated population* is in a similar position to the USA *unvaccinated population* a year ago. Such a result brings CoVID-19 infection closer to becoming *endemic*. The ‘silver lining’ to this dour cloud is that those who are vaccinated appear to have much less severe CoVID-19 infection impacts.

One significant difference between this *initial stage* of the USA CoVID-19 Winter 2021 Resurgence and the prior USA CoVID-19 Winter 2020 Resurgence is that the *δ**o*-parameter associated with *mask-wearing* was significantly higher in 2020, compared to this *initial stage* of the USA CoVID-19 Winter 2021 Resurgence, which showed *δ**o* ≈ 0 result.

If *δ**o* *≈* 0 persists, along with the present {*N**o*; *t**R*; *α**S*} values, this CoVID-19 Winter 2021 Resurgence will have the capacity to infect nearly everyone who is not practicing the strictest CoVID-19 prevention protocols, with the resulting *N*(*t*) projections for *δ**o* ≈ 0 given in the prior section. Significantly increased *mask-wearing* and enhanced *Social Distancing* measures are needed to prevent these high levels of USA CoVID-19 projected cases from actually occurring.

## Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.

## Footnotes

*   * *(10*.*1101_2021*.*08*.*16*.*21262150; 10*.*1101_2021*.*10*.*15*.*21265078)*

*   Received January 6, 2022.
*   Revision received January 6, 2022.
*   Accepted January 7, 2022.


*   © 2022, Posted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

This pre-print is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International), CC BY 4.0, as described at [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/](http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

## 5 References

1.  1.[https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.05.04.20091207v1](https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.05.04.20091207v1) “Initial Model for the Impact of Social Distancing on CoVID-19 Spread”
    
    

2.  2.[https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.06.30.20143149v1](https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.06.30.20143149v1) “Orthogonal Functions for Evaluating Social Distancing Impact on CoVID-19 Spread”
    
    

3.  3.[https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.08.07.20169904](https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.08.07.20169904) “Model to Describe Fast Shutoff of CoVID-19 Pandemic Spread”
    
    

4.  4.[https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.09.16.20196063](https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.09.16.20196063) “Initial Model for USA CoVID-19 Resurgence”
    
    

5.  5.[https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2021.08.16.21262150](https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2021.08.16.21262150) “The IHME vs Me: Modeling USA CoVID-19 Spread, Early Data to the Fifth Wave”
    
    

6.  6.[https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2021.10.15.21265078](https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2021.10.15.21265078) “Updated Model for the USA Summer 2021 CoVID-19 Resurgence”

 [1]: /embed/graphic-1.gif
 [2]: /embed/inline-graphic-1.gif
 [3]: /embed/inline-graphic-2.gif
 [4]: /embed/graphic-2.gif
 [5]: /embed/inline-graphic-3.gif
 [6]: /embed/inline-graphic-4.gif
 [7]: /embed/inline-graphic-5.gif
 [8]: /embed/inline-graphic-6.gif
 [9]: /embed/graphic-3.gif
 [10]: /embed/graphic-4.gif
 [11]: /embed/graphic-5.gif
 [12]: /embed/graphic-6.gif
 [13]: /embed/graphic-7.gif
 [14]: /embed/graphic-8.gif
 [15]: /embed/inline-graphic-7.gif
 [16]: /embed/inline-graphic-8.gif
 [17]: /embed/graphic-10.gif
 [18]: /embed/graphic-11.gif
 [19]: /embed/graphic-12.gif
 [20]: /embed/graphic-13.gif
 [21]: /embed/graphic-14.gif
 [22]: /embed/graphic-15.gif
 [23]: /embed/graphic-16.gif
 [24]: /embed/graphic-17.gif
 [25]: /embed/graphic-18.gif
 [26]: /embed/graphic-20.gif
 [27]: /embed/graphic-21.gif
 [28]: /embed/graphic-23.gif