Abstract
The current USA 2021 CoVID-19 Winter Resurgence is modeled here with the same function used for analyzing prior USA CoVID-19 waves: Here, N(t) gives the total number of CoVID-19 cases above the previous baseline, and tR sets the initial tdbl = tR (ln 2) pandemic tdbl doubling time. Larger αS values indicate that uninfected people are improving their pandemic mitigation efforts, such as Social Distancing and vaccinations ; while δ0 > 0 accelerates the post-peak tail-off, and is empirically associated with mask-wearing. The pandemic wave end is when N(t) no longer increases.
The USA Summer 2021 resurgence results from our prior medrxiv.org preprints* were used as a baseline. By 11/15/2021, an additional cases above baseline were found, signaling the USA Winter 2021 resurgence. This CoVID-19 wave is still in its initial stages. Presently, our analysis indicates that this CoVID-19 wave can infect virtually all susceptible persons; just like the initial stage of the USA Summer 2021 resurgence. Data up through 12/30/2021 gives these paremeter values: These values are identical to the prior 2020 USA Winter Resurgence results. Also, the and the values are similar. However, while the Winter 2020 Resurgence showed a significant mask-wearing effect , this initial USA Winter 2021 Resurgence shows practically no mask-wearing effects . If mask-wearing were to quickly rise to the Winter 2020 levels, it would give these projected totals: More robust mask-wearing and enhanced Social Distancing measures could further reduce these values (with 3 Figures).
1 Introduction
Each new USA CoVID-19 wave usually starts with a sharp rise in the total number N(t) of new cases. The time evolution for each of these waves has been successfully modeled1–6 using this basic function for N(t): Equation [1.1] represents the USA Winter 2021 CoVID-19 Resurgence cases above a baseline that is set by the USA Summer 2021 Resurgence from our prior medrxiv.org preprints5–6. The standard SEIR (Susceptible, Exposed, Infected, and Recovered or Removed) epidemiology models all start with an exponential growth (Ro > 1) or decay (Ro < 1): where tR > 0 sets the initial growth rate, and tdbl sets the initial N(t) doubling-time. Virtually all SEIR models are local models, with Ro representing the average number of people who will become infected by an ailing person during the course of their illness.
Given a total population of NALL, the uninfected population U(t) is: Using Eq. [1.1] implicitly assumes that N(t) << NALL for all times of interest, so that pandemic saturation effects can be ignored. In general, SEIR models do not explicitly consider what the U(t) uninfected population may be doing in response to the pandemic, prior to becoming infected. In contrast, Eq. [1.1] was developed as a non-local extension of SEIR models, to explicitly take into account what the uninfected population, as a whole, is doing to mitigate pandemic spread.
Since Eq. [1.1] is empirically based, it does not predict when each new CoVID-19 wave will start, or what biological and social circumstances are causing the new wave. As a result, the t = 0 point for each wave is usually set by when the resurgence is first easily identified, with N(t = 0) = No being the number of cases above baseline at that time. But once the CoVID-19 wave becomes established, Eq. [1.1] appears to successfully predict its time evolution.
As given in our prior preprints1–6, the parameter αS measures the combined effect of virtually all large-scale pandemic mitigation efforts. These include Social Distancing requirements, such as minimum separation distances and decreased allowable occupancy; along with lockdowns, “stay at home” orders, school closures, and restrictions on business operations; as well as the impact of large-scale vaccination efforts. The δo > 0 parameter accelerates the post-peak tail-off, and our prior work3–6 shows that it is empirically associated with mask-wearing.
The calculated end for each pandemic wave occurs when N(t) in Eq. [1.1] for the total number of cases first stops increasing, which makes the final stages of calculated post-peak tail-off inaccurate. However, the pandemic wave is substantially over by then, assuming that no follow-on resurgence occurs.
2 The USA Winter 2021 Resurgence
Our CoVID-19 modeling using the same few parameters has been successful at predicting the time evolution of each prior USA CoVID-19 wave1–6. This result shows that the response of the U(t) uninfected population was similar for each wave, even if different dominating factors drove each new resurgence.
Deviations of ∼107, 000 extra cases above the USA Summer 2021 baseline were observed by 11/15/2021. Thus, the USA is now in the initial stages of a Winter 2021 resurgence, as shown in Figure 1. Our calculations indicate that this CoVID-19 wave presently can infect virtually all susceptible people; a result that is similar to the initial stage of the USA Summer 2021 wave5.
In addition, two of the three Eq. [1.1] parameter values, as determined using the data up through 12/30/2021, were found to be identical to the 2020 USA Winter Resurgence values as follows: Both CoVID-19 Winter Resurgences also have similar No values: indicating that both waves started similarly. However, the Winter 2020 Resurgence was associated with a non-negligible amount of mask-wearing, as measured by δo in Eq. [1.1]. In contrast, this initial stage of the USA Winter 2021 wave is associated with having virtually no mask-wearing effects: In Figure 2, the {No; tR; αS; δo} parameter values for this Winter 2021 Resurgence are compared to each of the prior USA CoVID-19 waves. If mask-wearing were now to quickly rise to the Winter 2020 levels, without changing the other Winter 2021 Resurgence parameters, the total number of projected USA CoVID-19 cases would be:
Without mask-wearing [δo ≈ 0], the 3/21/2022 projection would change to: with the calculated N(t) for [3/21/2024] substantially exceeding the NALL total US population. At that point the Eq. [1.1] assumption that NALL is large enough so that N(t) << NALL for all times of interest, would no longer be valid. The USA would be in a pandemic saturation stage, where practically everybody is or was infected.
Figure 3 shows our model predictions vs CoVID-19 data for the entire pandemic, from March 2020 through January 2022. Whenever the pandemic appeared to be beaten down, restrictions were relaxed, CoVID-19 cases increased, new CoVID-19 variants appeared, and the pandemic rose up again, almost with every season.
The daily number of new cases dN(t) / dt in Figure 3 has peaks for the initial Spring 2020 pandemic; a Summer 2020 resurgence; the long Winter 2020 Resurgence; a small uptick in Spring 2021; the USA Summer 2021 Resurgence; and now the USA Winter 2021 Resurgence.
In addition, Figure 3 shows Winter 2021 Resurgence projections for two different δo-values. One projection is the best datafit to date (12/30/2021), and uses δo ≤ 0.001 × 10−3 / day. The other projection is how the Winter 2021 Resurgence would progress, if δo were to suddenly increase to the prior Winter 2020 Resurgence value of δo = 1.748 × 10−3 / day.
3 Summary
It is January 2022, and the USA is in the midst of the initial stages of a CoVID-19 Winter 2021 Resurgence. Using the USA CoVID-19 Summer 2021 Resurgence as a baseline5–6, the latest CoVID-19 wave was modeled using: with those results shown in Figure 1. This function was used to analyze each previous USA CoVID-19 wave1–6. Since the same few parameters successfully apply to all these USA CoVID-19 waves, with only different t = 0 starting points and {No; tR; αS; δo} parameter values allowed, it shows that the response of the U(t) uninfected population has been similar for each CoVID-19 wave, even if different factors were driving each new resurgence.
This effect is best seen by comparing the parameters derived for this initial stage of the USA CoVID-19 Winter 2021 Resurgence to the prior USA CoVID-19 Winter 2020 Resurgence, as shown in Figure 2. Both have similar {No; tR; αS} parameter values, indicating the USA population is in a similar position with respect to CoVID-19 in both cases. No doubt, the large number of Winter 2021 CoVID-19 Resurgence cases is being driven by infections from the most recent Omicron CoVID-19 variant.
However, back on Jan. 7, 2021, during the Winter 2020 Resurgence, only about ∼ 3% of the USA population had received any vaccinations, with only ∼0.3% being fully vaccinated. At that time, the U(t) uninfected population was substantially unvaccinated. In contrast, by Jan. 2022, a substantial fraction of the U(t) uninfected population was considered fully vaccinated.
Given the known capacity for the Omicron CoVID-19 variant to infect fully vaccinated persons, the similarity in the {No; tR; αS} parameters between these two USA Winter Resurgences, shows that the USA vaccinated population is in a similar position to the USA unvaccinated population a year ago. Such a result brings CoVID-19 infection closer to becoming endemic. The ‘silver lining’ to this dour cloud is that those who are vaccinated appear to have much less severe CoVID-19 infection impacts.
One significant difference between this initial stage of the USA CoVID-19 Winter 2021 Resurgence and the prior USA CoVID-19 Winter 2020 Resurgence is that the δo-parameter associated with mask-wearing was significantly higher in 2020, compared to this initial stage of the USA CoVID-19 Winter 2021 Resurgence, which showed δo ≈ 0 result.
If δo ≈ 0 persists, along with the present {No; tR; αS} values, this CoVID-19 Winter 2021 Resurgence will have the capacity to infect nearly everyone who is not practicing the strictest CoVID-19 prevention protocols, with the resulting N(t) projections for δo ≈ 0 given in the prior section. Significantly increased mask-wearing and enhanced Social Distancing measures are needed to prevent these high levels of USA CoVID-19 projected cases from actually occurring.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.
Footnotes
↵* (10.1101_2021.08.16.21262150; 10.1101_2021.10.15.21265078)