Summary
Background SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with enhanced disease severity in pregnant women. Despite the potential of COVID-19 vaccines to reduce severe disease, vaccine uptake remained relatively low among pregnant women. Just as coordinated messaging from the CDC and leading obstetrics organizations began to increase vaccine confidence in this vulnerable group, the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns (VOC) including the Omicron VOC raised new concerns about vaccine efficacy, given their ability to escape vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies. Early data point to a milder disease course following omicron VOC infection in vaccinated individuals. Thus, these data suggest that alternate vaccine induced immunity, beyond neutralization, may continue to attenuate omicron disease, such as antibody-Fc-mediated activity. However, whether vaccine induced antibodies raised in pregnancy continue to bind and leverage Fc-receptors remains unclear.
Methods VOC including Omicron receptor binding domain (RBD) or full Spike specific antibody isotype binding titers and FcγR binding were analyzed in pregnant women after the full dose regimen of either Pfizer/BioNtech BNT62b2 (n=10) or Moderna mRNA-1273 (n=10) vaccination using a multiplexing Luminex assay.
Findings Comparable, albeit reduced, isotype recognition was observed to the Omicron Spike and receptor binding domain (RBD) following both vaccines. Yet, despite the near complete loss of Fc-receptor binding to the Omicron RBD, Fc-receptor binding was largely preserved to the Omicron Spike.
Interpretation Reduced binding titer to the Omicron RBD aligns with observed loss of neutralizing activity. Despite the loss of neutralization, preserved Omicron Spike recognition and Fc-receptor binding potentially continues to attenuate disease severity in pregnant women.
Funding NIH and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Competing Interest Statement
G.A. is a founder and equity holder of Seromyx Systems, a company developing a platform technology that describes the antibody immune response. G.A. is an employee and equity holder of Leyden Labs, a company developing pandemic prevention therapeutics. G.A.s interests were reviewed and are managed by Massachusetts General Hospital and Partners HealthCare in accordance with their conflict of interest policies. All other authors have declared that no conflicts of interest exist.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the NIH (3R37AI080289-11S1, R01AI146785, U19AI42790-01, U19AI135995-02, , 1U01CA260476-01, CIVIC75N93019C00052 and The Gates Foundation Global Health Vaccine Accelerator Platform (OPP1146996 and INV-001650). AGE received funding from the NIH (R01HD100022-S2) and March of Dimes Foundation (6-FY-20-223) to support sample collection.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board (IRB protocol #2020P003538).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
