Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Protective effect of BNT162b2 vaccination on aerobic capacity following mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection: a cross sectional study, Israel, March-December 2021

View ORCID ProfileYair Blumberg, View ORCID ProfileMichael Edelstein, View ORCID ProfileKamal Abu Jabal, Ron Golan, Yuval Perets, Musa Saad, View ORCID ProfileTatyana Levinas, Saleem Dabbah, View ORCID ProfileZeev Israeli, Salah Yacoubi, Alaa Abu Raya, Anat Amital, View ORCID ProfileMajdi Halabi
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.30.21268538
Yair Blumberg
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
2Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Yair Blumberg
  • For correspondence: Yair.Blumberg@biu.ac.il
Michael Edelstein
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
2Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael Edelstein
Kamal Abu Jabal
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
2Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kamal Abu Jabal
Ron Golan
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuval Perets
2Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Musa Saad
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tatyana Levinas
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
2Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Tatyana Levinas
Saleem Dabbah
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zeev Israeli
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
2Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zeev Israeli
Salah Yacoubi
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alaa Abu Raya
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anat Amital
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Majdi Halabi
1Rivka Ziv Medical Center, Zefat, Israel
2Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Majdi Halabi
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that patients who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 may experience adverse health outcomes months after the acute infection has resolved including reduction in aerobic capacity and fatigue. In this study, we compared aerobic capacity and exercise performance of 28 unvaccinated participants to 15 vaccinated ones who performed a symptom limited cardio-pulmonary exercise test (CPET) after acute COVID-19. We identified a significant difference in aerobic capacity between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, with a lower V’O2 peak percentage of predicted in the unvaccinated group. In addition, the unvaccinated group had a reduction in the peak-exercise heart rate and lower ventilation values. Our results suggest objective limitations to exercise capacity in the months following acute COVID19 illness, mitigated by vaccination

Introduction

Patients who were infected with acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) may experience post-acute adverse health outcomes, a phenomenon that has been named long COVID. The current case definition remains very broad [1] but the most commonly reported symptoms are fatigue, headache and attention/concentration issues, with dyspnoea being fifth [2]. In addition, reduced aerobic capacity has been demonstrated in both mild and moderate COVID19 patients[3].

The impact of vaccination on long COVID remains unclear. One large British study showed an association between COVID19 vaccination and a reduction in reported post-acute symptoms, without specifying the symptoms or follow-up duration [4]. Another study showed that one or more doses of COVID-19 vaccine was not associated with a reduction in reported long-COVID symptoms, but two doses were [5]. These studies measure self-reported symptoms. This study is, to our knowledge, the first to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 in terms of aerobic capacity and exercise performance.

Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted at the cardiac rehabilitation department of Ziv Medical Centre, a 300-bed government hospital in Safed, Northern Israel, between March 2021 and December 2021 (Ethics approval:0100-20-ZIV). Individuals aged 18 to 65 years with previously documented mild to moderate COVID-19 disease were eligible to participate. Each participant performed a symptom-limited cardio-pulmonary exercise test (CPET) using an individually calibrated bicycle ergometer (Cortex-Medical). Prior to exercise, each patient underwent spirometry tests according to the American Thoracic Society protocol [6]. The CPET test was performed on a cycle ergometer; subjects were asked to maintain a constant pedalling frequency of 60 ± 5 revolutions per minute. Throughout the test, cardiac electrical activity was monitored using continuous electrocardiography. Blood pressure and Perceived Exertion (RPE) were measured every two minutes.

Peak oxygen consumption (V’O2) was defined as the highest value of V’O2 attained in a 20 second interval. Age-predicted heart rate (HR) was calculated as 220-age (bpm). The anaerobic threshold (AT), referring to the point at which ventilation starts to increase at a faster rate than V’O2, was determined by the V-slope method [6].

The minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (V’E/V’CO2) slope was calculated as the coefficient of linear regression obtained by plotting the V’E and V’CO2 data of the subject’s exercise phase.

We described the characteristics of each group and compared them using chi square tests. We calculated means and standard errors (SE) for each observation category. We compared observed CPET results to predicted values within each group using t-tests. Between-group differences were measured using chi square (for proportions) and t-tests (for means). Analysis was performed using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY). P-value of 5% or less was considered statistically significant.

Results

Forty-three participants were enrolled: 28 unvaccinated and 15 vaccinated; patient characteristics and symptoms during and after the acute COVID-19 episode are presented in Table 1. All patients were infected prior to the Omicron variant being imported to Israel. All vaccinated patients except for 2 received at least 2 doses, and all were infected post vaccination. The CPET test was conducted at a mean of 119±24 days after acute disease with no difference between the two groups (p=0.12). There was no difference in baseline demographic and pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters, six participants from the unvaccinated group had comorbidities as presented in Table 1. The major cardiopulmonary metrics are summarized in Table 2. Compared with unvaccinated individuals, those vaccinated had higher mean V’O2/kg at peak exercise as well as mean peak heart rate (HR) (Figure 1). The mean V’O2/kg peak in the unvaccinated group was 83% of predicted vs 95% in the vaccinated (p<0.05, Table 2); In the unvaccinated group, 14/28 subjects (50%) had a V’O2 peak < 80% of predicted vs 2/15 (14%) among those vaccinated. The maximum HR and VE were reduced among unvaccinated participants compared with those vaccinated (Figure-1, Table 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Participant characteristics, symptoms and pulmonary function test (PFT)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table 2.

CPET parameters at peak exercise and AT among vaccinated and unvaccinated patients previously infected with COVID19

Figure 1:
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
Figure 1:

VO2/Kg peak (panel A) and Peak Heart Rate (panel B) among COVID19 Unvaccinated vs Vaccinated patients previously infected with SARS-CoV-2

Discussion

This study aimed to determine whether vaccination was associated with exercise capacity as measured with CPET among individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, after the acute phase of COVID-19.

We found a difference in aerobic capacity between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. Unvaccinated individuals on average reached a lower proportion of their predicted peak V’O2, and HR. A high proportion of unvaccinated individuals performed poorly (<80% of predicted) on these indicators.

These results suggest chronotropic incompetence in the unvaccinated group, with a reduction in the peak-exercise HR and VE, contributing to limited exercise capacity. Similar results have been demonstrated for HR in other studies [7,8]. In our cohort we show that there is also a difference in ventilation (V’E), with lower values for the unvaccinated group.

Identifying the pathological mechanism leading to an inability to increase HR and ventilation are beyond the scope of this study. Suggested mechanisms in the literature include Immune- mediated damage to the autonomic nervous system during COVID-19 and a peripheral cardiac limit to exercise resulting from an oxygen diffusion defect [9,10]

Limitations

Our study has some limitations, including the small cohort size and differences in baseline characteristics. However, the fact that we measure findings in individuals against their own predicted value adjusts for these differences to a large extent. A sub analysis excluding patients with co-morbidities did not change the findings (data not shown). Two of the patients were only partially vaccinated, possibly leading to a slight underestimation of the effect of vaccination. We did not evaluate blood gas, which could have revealed more about the main cause of exercise limitation for patients with reduced pVO2.

Conclusion

This study suggests that COVID19 patients can suffer from objective limitations to exercise capacity in the months following their acute episode. Our study is the first to show a protective effect of vaccination against decreased aerobic capacity. As a more objectively quantifiable definition of long COVID is needed, studies able to demonstrate measurable changes post-acute infection with SARS-CoV-2 are essential. The measured protective effect of vaccination gives additional reasons to continue and intensify the vaccine drive globally and similar studies should be replicated on a larger scale to confirm our results.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Funding statement

the study received no external funding

Conflict of interest statement

the authors declare no conflict of interest

Footnotes

  • Correction of a number in the abstract and use of the corrected abstract version

References

  1. ↵
    World Health Organization. A clinical case definition of post COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus, 6 October 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Post_COVID-19_condition-Clinical_case_definition-2021.1 (accessed 27 Dec 2021).
  2. ↵
    Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Perelman C, et al. More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Reports 2021 111 2021;11:1–12. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-95565-8
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    Baratto C, Caravita S, Faini A, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on exercise pathophysiology: a combined cardiopulmonary and echocardiographic exercise study. J Appl Physiol 2021;130:1470–8. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00710.2020
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    Antonelli M, Penfold RS, Merino J, et al. Risk factors and disease profile of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK users of the COVID Symptom Study app: a prospective, community-based, nested, case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis 2021;0. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00460-6/ATTACHMENT/348A9556-33C6-4D7E-8B79-8C9A68F2125D/MMC1.PDF
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    Taquet M, Dercon Q, Harrison PJ. Six-month sequelae of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection: a retrospective cohort study of 10,024 breakthrough infections. medRxiv 2021;:2021.10.26.21265508. doi:10.1101/2021.10.26.21265508
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Albouaini K, Egred M, Alahmar A, et al. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and its application. Postgrad. Med. J. 2007;83:675–82. doi:10.1136/hrt.2007.121558
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Szekely Y, Lichter Y, Sadon S, et al. Cardiorespiratory Abnormalities in Patients Recovering from Coronavirus Disease 2019. J Am Soc Echocardiogr Published Online First: September 2021. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2021.08.022
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    Jimeno-Almazán A, Pallarés JG, Buendía-Romero Á, et al. Chronotropic Incompetence in Non-Hospitalized Patients with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome. J Clin Med 2021, Vol 10, Page 5434 2021;10:5434. doi:10.3390/JCM10225434
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    Barizien N, Le Guen M, Russel S, et al. Clinical characterization of dysautonomia in long COVID-19 patients. Sci Reports 2021 111 2021;11:1–7. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93546-5
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    Singh I, Joseph P, Heerdt PM, et al. Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing. Chest Published Online First: August 2021. doi:10.1016/J.CHEST.2021.08.010
    OpenUrlCrossRef
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 02, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Protective effect of BNT162b2 vaccination on aerobic capacity following mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection: a cross sectional study, Israel, March-December 2021
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Protective effect of BNT162b2 vaccination on aerobic capacity following mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection: a cross sectional study, Israel, March-December 2021
Yair Blumberg, Michael Edelstein, Kamal Abu Jabal, Ron Golan, Yuval Perets, Musa Saad, Tatyana Levinas, Saleem Dabbah, Zeev Israeli, Salah Yacoubi, Alaa Abu Raya, Anat Amital, Majdi Halabi
medRxiv 2021.12.30.21268538; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.30.21268538
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Protective effect of BNT162b2 vaccination on aerobic capacity following mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection: a cross sectional study, Israel, March-December 2021
Yair Blumberg, Michael Edelstein, Kamal Abu Jabal, Ron Golan, Yuval Perets, Musa Saad, Tatyana Levinas, Saleem Dabbah, Zeev Israeli, Salah Yacoubi, Alaa Abu Raya, Anat Amital, Majdi Halabi
medRxiv 2021.12.30.21268538; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.30.21268538

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (174)
  • Allergy and Immunology (421)
  • Anesthesia (97)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (901)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (170)
  • Dermatology (102)
  • Emergency Medicine (257)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (407)
  • Epidemiology (8783)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (405)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1861)
  • Geriatric Medicine (178)
  • Health Economics (388)
  • Health Informatics (1291)
  • Health Policy (644)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (491)
  • Hematology (207)
  • HIV/AIDS (394)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10557)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (564)
  • Medical Education (193)
  • Medical Ethics (52)
  • Nephrology (218)
  • Neurology (1754)
  • Nursing (103)
  • Nutrition (266)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (342)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (461)
  • Oncology (964)
  • Ophthalmology (282)
  • Orthopedics (107)
  • Otolaryngology (176)
  • Pain Medicine (117)
  • Palliative Medicine (43)
  • Pathology (264)
  • Pediatrics (557)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (264)
  • Primary Care Research (219)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1843)
  • Public and Global Health (3983)
  • Radiology and Imaging (654)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (344)
  • Respiratory Medicine (535)
  • Rheumatology (215)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (178)
  • Sports Medicine (166)
  • Surgery (197)
  • Toxicology (37)
  • Transplantation (106)
  • Urology (80)