Abstract
The BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine has been shown to reduce viral load of breakthrough infections (BTIs), an important factor affecting infectiousness. This viral-load protective effect has been waning with time post the second vaccine and later restored with a booster shot. It is currently unclear though for how long this regained effectiveness lasts. Analyzing Ct values of SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR tests of over 22,000 infections during a Delta-variant-dominant period in Israel, we found that this viral-load reduction effectiveness significantly declines within months post the booster dose. Adjusting for age, sex and calendric date, Ct values of RdRp gene initially increased by 2.7 [CI: 2.3-3.0] relative to unvaccinated in the first month post the booster dose, yet then decayed to a difference of 1.3 [CI: 0.7-1.9] in the second month and became small and insignificant in the third to fourth months. The rate and magnitude of this post-booster decline in viral-load reduction effectiveness mirror those observed post the second vaccine. These results suggest rapid waning of the booster’s effectiveness in reducing infectiousness, possibly affecting community-level spread of the virus.
The Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 vaccine1,2 demonstrated high real-life effectiveness in prevention of infection and disease3–5 as well as in reducing viral loads of breakthrough infections (BTIs)6. Indeed, national vaccination campaigns were initially followed by reduced infection rates, with the effect extending beyond the individual vaccinees to the community level7–9. Considering longer post-vaccination times, studies have shown that while vaccine effectiveness in preventing severe disease declines only mildly10, the effectiveness of protection against infection2,11–13 and of reducing viral loads of BTIs strongly declines within several months14. A booster (third) dose was associated with restoring effectiveness of prevention of infection and disease15, as well as with reduction of BTI viral-loads14. Yet, it is unknown for how long these booster’s regained effectiveness lasts and whether there will be a need for additional booster shots in the future16.
Here, we focus on the booster’s association with reduced viral loads over time. We retrospectively collected and analyzed the reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT–qPCR) test measurements of three SARS-CoV-2 genes - E, N and RdRp (Allplex 2019-nCoV assay, Seegene) - from positive tests of patients of Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS). We focus on infections of adults over the age of 20 between June 28 and November 29 2021, before the Omicron variant started circulating in Israel, and when Delta was the dominant variant in the country (over 93%)17. Crossing this dataset with vaccination data, we identified in total 5,229 infections of unvaccinated, 16,038 BTIs of 2-dose-vaccinated and 1,390 BTIs of booster-vaccinated individuals (Methods: “Vaccination status”, Extended Data Table 1).
Study population.
For each of the three viral genes, we built a multivariable linear regression model for the relationship between Ct value and vaccination at different post-second-vaccination time bins and post-booster time bins, adjusted for sex, age and calendric date (Methods; n=22,657 infections). Consistent with our previous reports6,14, regression coefficients for second-dose vaccinated, compared to unvaccinated, started with 4.2 [95% CI: 2.2-6.1] for BTIs occurring 7-30 days post 2nd vaccine dose and then decayed over time, effectively vanishing 6 months or longer post vaccination (RdRp gene, Fig. 1; Extended Data Fig. 1 for the E and N genes). Then, as previously observed14, the booster restored effectiveness, with the Ct increasing by 2.7 [CI: 2.3-3.0] for infections occurring 7-30 days post the booster, corresponding to more than 6-fold reduction in viral load (RdRp gene, Fig. 1). However, this booster-associated viral-load reducing effectiveness rapidly declined, reaching 1.3 [CI: 0.7-1.9] and 0.8 [CI: -0.1-1.8] for BTIs occurring 31-60 and 61-120 days post the booster shot, respectively. Of note, age distributions of individuals in the above 3 post-booster time bins were very similar (Extended Data Fig. 2). A time-differential model further quantified these reductions and their statistical significance, yielding a difference of 2.6 [CI: 0.1-5.0, P=0.04] and 1.4 [CI: 0.7-2.0, P=0.00002] between the Ct’s of infections in the first and second time bins (7-30 versus 31-60 days) post the second dose and post the booster, respectively (Methods). These differences correspond to within-month percent decreases of 62% (2.6/4.2) and 52% (1.4/2.7) in Ct-reduction post the second dose and the booster shot, respectively. Similar trends were also observed for the 2 other genes, N and E (Extended Data Fig. 1). To avoid effects of severe cases on the results, we also analyzed the data again while excluding hospitalized patients, obtaining similar results (Extended Data Fig. 3).
Ct regression coefficients of the N gene (a) and the E gene (b), indicating an infection Ct relative to unvaccinated control group (dashed line). Coefficients were obtained by multivariate linear regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex and calendric date (Methods; n = 22,657). Error bars represent one standard error. All P values are two sided: ‘ns’, not significant, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.
Shown are the age distributions of individuals infected 7-30 days (blue), 31-60 days (orange) and 61-120 days (green) post-booster.
Same model as in Fig. 1 and Extended Data Figure 1, but excluding patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 (n = 22,271). Ct regression coefficients are shown for the RdRp (a), N (b) and E (c) genes. Error bars represent one standard error. All P values are two sided: ‘ns’, not significant, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.
Ct regression coefficients, indicating an infection Ct relative to unvaccinated control group (dashed line), show an initial increase in Ct in the first month after the second vaccination dose, which then gradually diminishes. Increased Ct is restored after the booster, yet this regained effectiveness also gradually diminishes. Coefficients were obtained by multivariate linear regression analysis, adjusting for age, sex and calendric date (Methods; n = 22,657). Error bars represent one standard error. All P values are two sided: ‘ns’, not significant, * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001. Data are shown for Ct of the RdRp gene; for genes N and E, see Extended Data Fig. 1a, b.
Our study has a number of limitations. First, although viral load is a common proxy for infectiousness, a correlation between viral loads and infectability is not fully established. Second, differences in health-seeking behaviors may affect the timing at which individuals are tested and as viral load is associated with time post infection, such differences may in principle bias our results. Yet, we note that we minimized this effect by considering only the first positive test for each patient, which is typically performed within 5-6 days following infection, namely 1-2 days following symptoms15,18–20.
In total, these initial observations show that the BNT162b2 booster regained effectiveness in reducing BTI viral loads is declining within months, in a rate and magnitude mirroring those observed post the second vaccine. Pending post-booster time-dependency data also on the effectiveness of disease prevention, these results warrant consideration of the long-term effectiveness of the mRNA vaccine and the possible benefit and anticipated duration of additional booster shots.
Data Availability
According to Israel Ministry of Health regulations, individual-level data cannot be shared openly. Specific requests for remote access to de-identified data should be referred to KSM, the Maccabi Healthcare Services Research and Innovation Center. Requests sent to Sarit Chehanowitz (chehanow_s@mac.org.il) will be considered within 21 d pending IRB approval and Maccabi Healthcare Services regulations.
Methods
Data collection
Anonymized SARS-CoV-2 RT–qPCR Ct values were retrieved for all of the positive samples taken between 28 June and 29 November 2021, and tested at the MHS central laboratory. Patient data included sex, year of birth, any record of COVID-assocaited hospitalization and a baseline condition of immunosuppression. For patients with multiple positive tests, only the first positive test was included. Vaccination dates for these patients were retrieved from the centralized database of MHS. Immunocompromised patients were excluded (974). Patients were excluded if their first positive sample was between the first shot and one week after the second shot (where the vaccine is presumably not yet effective). Patients with a first positive sample within the first week following the booster shot were also excluded for the same reason. Additionally, patients with positive test results before the study period were excluded. For each test, Ct values for E gene, RdRp gene, N gene and the internal control were determined using Seegene proprietary software for the Allplex 2019-nCoV assay after the standard oro-nasopharyngeal swab specimen collection procedure. The same PCR model was used for all of the tests (Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System).
Vaccination status
Patients tested positive 7 days or more after the second shot were regarded as ‘vaccinated’. Patients tested positive 7 days or more after the third shot were regarded as ‘booster-vaccinated’. Patients tested positive less than 7 days after the second shot were excluded, as well as patients tested positive between 0 and 7 days after their booster shot.
Linear regression
For each of the three viral genes, we calculated the linear regression of Ct values as a function of time since second shot (length-8 onehot vector indicating 0/1 for time bins of 7-30 days, 31-60 days, 61-120 days, 121-180 days, >180 days after the second shot; 7-30 days, 31-60 days, 61-120 days after the booster; all 0’s for unvaccinated), sex (0/1, female/male), age (bins of 10 years), calendric date (number of days since 28 June, 2021) and a quadratic variable of calendric date. Models were implemented using Python’s statsmodels library, version 0.9.0.
Change in Ct over time
To calculate the change in Ct between post-vaccination time bins, we applied the same linear regression model as above, except replacing the length-8 onehot vector of post-vaccination time with a 8-length time-accumulated binary vector indicating [0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0], [1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0], [1,1,0,0,0,0,0,0], [1,1,1,0,0,0,0,0], [1,1,1,1,0,0,0,0], [1,1,1,1,1,0,0,0], [1,1,1,1,1,1,0,0], [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,0], [1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1] for infections in unvaccinated, or 7-30 days, 31-60 days, 61-120 days, 121-180 days and over 180 days post the second vaccination, or 7-30 days, 31-60 days and 61-120 days post the booster.
Data availability
According to Israel Ministry of Health regulations, individual-level data cannot be shared openly. Specific requests for remote access to de-identified data should be referred to KSM, the Maccabi Healthcare Services Research and Innovation Center. Requests sent to Sarit Chehanowitz (chehanow_s@mac.org.il) will be considered within 21 d pending IRB approval and Maccabi Healthcare Services regulations.
Ethics committee approval
This study was approved by the MHS (Maccabi Healthcare Services) Institutional Review Board (IRB). Due to the retrospective design of the study, informed consent was waived by the IRB, and all identifying details of the participants were removed before computational analysis.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Contributions
Study design: M.L.-T., I.Y., T.P., S.G., G.C. and R.K. Data collection: M.L.-T., I.Y., E.H. and H.A. Data analysis: M.L.-T., I.Y. and R.K. Data interpretation: M.L.-T., I.Y., J.K., T.P., S.G., G.C. and R.K. Writing: M.L.-T., I.Y. and R.K, with comments from all authors.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Israel Science Foundation KillCorona-Curbing Coronavirus Research Program (grant no. 3633/19 to R. K. and G.C.) and a fellowship from the Edmond J. Safra Center for Bioinformatics at Tel-Aviv University (to M. L-T). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
