Abstract
The criminal legal system in the United States drives an incarceration rate that is the highest on the planet, with disparities by class and race among its signature features [1–3]. During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of incarcerated people in the U.S. decreased by at least 17%—the largest, fastest reduction in prison population in American history [4]. In this study, we ask how this reduction influenced the racial com-position of U.S. prisons, and consider possible mechanisms for these dynamics. Using an original dataset curated from public sources on prison demographics across all 50 states and the District of Columbia, we show that incarcerated white people benefited disproportionately from the decrease in the U.S. prison population, and that the fraction of incarcerated Black and Latino people sharply increased. This pattern of increased racial disparity exists across prison systems in nearly every state and reverses a decades-long trend before 2020 and the onset of COVID-19, when the proportion of incarcerated white people was increasing amid declining numbers of incarcerated Black people [5]. Although a variety of factors underlie these trends, we find that racial inequities in average sentence length are a major contributor. Ultimately, this study reveals how disruptions caused by COVID-19 exacer-bated racial inequalities in the criminal legal system, and highlights key forces that sustain mass incarceration.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Updated main text, restructured manuscript and supplemental information.
↵1 Table A.4 is still awaiting answers from Washington D.C., Alabama, and Louisiana.
↵2 Note: OSCA is the organization that compiled the data and are not the custodians of the data. Clerks of the court record each defendant’s case data via the Offender Based Transaction System. Any conclusions or analysis that will derive from this dataset are solely those of the individual author(s) or the person(s) who did the analysis and not of the Florida Office of State Court Administrator.
Data Availability
The incarceration data used in this work are public records in each state, and we have included the source urls in Table A.1. Together, data from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Federal Bureau of Prisons create The Dataset on Incarcerated Populations, which we have made publicly available via an archived Zenodo repository [56] and a Github repository (https://github.com/jkbren/incarcerated-populations-data). The source data used to construct the Dataset on Incarcerated Populations is available via direct download through the links provided in Table A.1, by public records request, or by request to the corresponding author(s).
