Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Analysis: A meta-analysis of Early Results to predict Vaccine efficacy against Omicron

David S. Khoury, Megan Steain, James A. Triccas, Alex Sigal, View ORCID ProfileMiles P. Davenport, View ORCID ProfileDeborah Cromer
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.13.21267748
David S. Khoury
1Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan Steain
2School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
3Sydney Institute of Infectious Diseases and Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James A. Triccas
2School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
3Sydney Institute of Infectious Diseases and Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alex Sigal
4Africa Health Research Institute, Durban, South Africa
5School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
6Max Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miles P. Davenport
1Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Miles P. Davenport
Deborah Cromer
1Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Deborah Cromer
  • For correspondence: d.cromer@unsw.edu.au
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

In the studies to date, the estimated fold-drop in neutralisation titre against Omicron ranges from 2- to over 20-fold depending on the study and serum tested. Collating data from these results in a combined estimate of the drop in neutralisation titre against Omicron of 9.7-fold (95%CI 5.5-17.1). We use our previously established model to predict that six months after primary immunisation with an mRNA vaccine, efficacy for Omicron is estimated to have waned to around 40% against symptomatic and 80% against severe disease. A booster dose with an existing mRNA vaccine (even though it targets the ancestral spike) has the potential to raise efficacy for Omicron to 86.2% (95% CI: 72.6-94) against symptomatic infection and 98.2% (95% CI: 90.2-99.7) against severe infection.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

DSK, DC, and MPD are supported by NHMRC (Australia) Fellowship / Investigator grants. Some data in this study was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates award INV-018944 (AS), National Institutes of Health award R01 AI138546 (AS), and South African Medical Research Council awards (AS). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This work was approved under the UNSW Sydney Human Research Ethics Committee (approval HC200242).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 14, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Analysis: A meta-analysis of Early Results to predict Vaccine efficacy against Omicron
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Analysis: A meta-analysis of Early Results to predict Vaccine efficacy against Omicron
David S. Khoury, Megan Steain, James A. Triccas, Alex Sigal, Miles P. Davenport, Deborah Cromer
medRxiv 2021.12.13.21267748; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.13.21267748
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Analysis: A meta-analysis of Early Results to predict Vaccine efficacy against Omicron
David S. Khoury, Megan Steain, James A. Triccas, Alex Sigal, Miles P. Davenport, Deborah Cromer
medRxiv 2021.12.13.21267748; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.13.21267748

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (228)
  • Allergy and Immunology (506)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1245)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (534)
  • Epidemiology (10032)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2467)
  • Geriatric Medicine (238)
  • Health Economics (480)
  • Health Informatics (1647)
  • Health Policy (754)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (637)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11872)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (253)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2290)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (352)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1249)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (325)
  • Pediatrics (734)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2281)
  • Public and Global Health (4844)
  • Radiology and Imaging (843)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (492)
  • Respiratory Medicine (652)
  • Rheumatology (286)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (269)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)