Abstract
Tumor response and disease progression are assessed using imaging technologies. However, these technologies fail to detect tumor responses at the molecular level and clonal evolution. A potential surrogate for such parameters is using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). This study aimed to examine the quantity and composition of the ctDNA results of 29 cancer patients before and after dendritic cell (DC) immunotherapy and develop criteria to evaluate the molecular response to treatment based on these results. We categorized the patients into four categories based on percent changes in the total ctDNA compared with the baseline ctDNA titers, and this response assessment was termed genomic response evaluation criteria in solid tumors or gRECIST. Even those who are clinically evaluated as having a good response might harbor unfavorable tumor responses at the molecular level. Newly formed ctDNA levels can be the most prognostic parameter in tumor progression or the treatment response, while ctDNA clearance and the decline or rise in existing ctDNA did not change significantly in genomic response categories (gRECIST). More research is needed to support the clinical use of ctDNA in precision oncology and personalized cancer treatment.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Institutional Review Board of Midtown Clinic Medical Corporation gave ethical approval of this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
