Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Scoping review of online postal sexually transmitted infection services: access, usage and clinical outcomes

Kirsi Sumray, Karen C. Lloyd, View ORCID ProfileClaudia Estcourt, Fiona Burns, View ORCID ProfileJo Gibbs
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.10.21267608
Kirsi Sumray
1Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen C. Lloyd
2Institute for Global Health, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: K.lloyd@ucl.ac.uk
Claudia Estcourt
3School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Claudia Estcourt
Fiona Burns
2Institute for Global Health, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jo Gibbs
2Institute for Global Health, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jo Gibbs
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background There has been considerable expansion in online postal self-sampling STI services in many parts of the UK, driven by increasing demand on sexual health services and developments in diagnostics and digital health provision. This shift in service delivery has occurred against a backdrop of reduced funding and service fragmentation and the impact is unknown. We explored characteristics of people accessing and using online postal self-sampling (OPSS) services for STIs in the UK, the acceptability of these services, and their impact on sexual health inequalities.

Methods A scoping review was conducted of studies published in English-language based on pre-agreed inclusion/exclusion criteria, between 01/01/2010 to 07/07/2021. Nine databases were searched, and 23 studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. Studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results Study designs were heterogenous, including quantitative, qualitative and mixed method analyses. The majority were either evaluating a single site/self-sampling provider, exploratory or observational and of variable quality. Few studies collected comprehensive user demographic data. Individuals accessing OPSS tended to be asymptomatic, of White ethnicity, women, over 20 years, and from less deprived areas. OPSS tended to increase overall STI testing demand and access, although return rates for blood samples was low, as was test positivity. There were varied results on whether services reduced time to treatment. OPSS services were acceptable to the majority of users. Qualitative studies showed the importance of trust, confidentiality, discretion, reliability, convenience and improved patient choice.

Conclusion OPSS services appear highly acceptable to users. However, uptake appears to be socially patterned and some groups that bear a disproportionate burden of poor sexual health in the UK are under-represented among users. Current provision of online self-sampling could widen health inequalities, particularly where other options for testing are limited. Work is needed to fully evaluate the impact and cost-effectiveness of OPSS services.

Key messages

  1. An increasing proportion of STI testing in the UK is occurring via online postal self-sampling services

  2. Service users tend to be asymptomatic, white, women, over 20s, and from less deprived areas

  3. OPSS services are acceptable to users and can improve choice

  4. There is a need for a wide-ranging evaluation of OPSS services to determine their impact on sexual health inequalities, access, clinical outcomes and service delivery

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted December 11, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Scoping review of online postal sexually transmitted infection services: access, usage and clinical outcomes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Scoping review of online postal sexually transmitted infection services: access, usage and clinical outcomes
Kirsi Sumray, Karen C. Lloyd, Claudia Estcourt, Fiona Burns, Jo Gibbs
medRxiv 2021.12.10.21267608; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.10.21267608
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Scoping review of online postal sexually transmitted infection services: access, usage and clinical outcomes
Kirsi Sumray, Karen C. Lloyd, Claudia Estcourt, Fiona Burns, Jo Gibbs
medRxiv 2021.12.10.21267608; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.10.21267608

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Sexual and Reproductive Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (179)
  • Allergy and Immunology (434)
  • Anesthesia (99)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (948)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
  • Dermatology (110)
  • Emergency Medicine (260)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (422)
  • Epidemiology (8989)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (420)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1959)
  • Geriatric Medicine (190)
  • Health Economics (402)
  • Health Informatics (1329)
  • Health Policy (660)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (519)
  • Hematology (212)
  • HIV/AIDS (420)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10809)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (575)
  • Medical Education (200)
  • Medical Ethics (54)
  • Nephrology (222)
  • Neurology (1830)
  • Nursing (110)
  • Nutrition (274)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (353)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (470)
  • Oncology (999)
  • Ophthalmology (298)
  • Orthopedics (111)
  • Otolaryngology (182)
  • Pain Medicine (126)
  • Palliative Medicine (44)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (580)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (276)
  • Primary Care Research (234)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1904)
  • Public and Global Health (4123)
  • Radiology and Imaging (676)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (368)
  • Respiratory Medicine (549)
  • Rheumatology (225)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (191)
  • Sports Medicine (177)
  • Surgery (207)
  • Toxicology (39)
  • Transplantation (109)
  • Urology (81)