Abstract
Objective This study aims to 1) investigate current practice regarding ‘weaning workshops’ to support complementary infant feeding delivered within Irish primary care, 2) explore the experiences and opinions of community dietitians regarding optimal content and modes of delivery of weaning workshops, and 3) identify the key factors to be considered in the development and implementation of weaning workshops delivered within primary care.
Design Cross-sectional survey
Setting Irish primary care
Participants 47 community-based dietitians
Results Sixteen dietitians reported that workshops were run in their area with variable frequency, with ten reporting that workshops were never run in their area. Participants reported that mostly mothers of medium socioeconomic status attended weaning workshops when infants were aged between 4-7 months, and that feedback from workshop attendees was predominantly positive. Dietitians identified that key factors to be considered in future development and delivery of weaning workshops are 1) workshop characteristics such as content, timing and venue, 2) organisational characteristics such as availability of resources and multidisciplinary involvement, and 3) attendee characteristics such as socioeconomic status.
Conclusions This study highlights substantial variability regarding provision of weaning workshops in Ireland, and a lack of standardisation regarding the provider, content, and frequency of workshops where workshops are being delivered. The study also provides unique insights into the experiences and opinions of primary care community dietitians regarding the development and delivery of weaning workshops in terms of optimal content and delivery options. These perspectives will make a valuable contribution given the dearth of evidence in this area internationally.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any fundinG
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was granted from the School of Public Health Internal Social Research Ethics Committee in University College Cork, Ireland
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* joint first authors
Conflict of Interest: None.
Ethical Standards Disclosure: This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving research study participants were approved by the School of Public Health Internal Social Research Ethics Committee in University College Cork. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
