Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

US women screen at lower rates for both cervical and colorectal cancers than a single cancer

View ORCID ProfileDiane M Harper, View ORCID ProfileMelissa Plegue, View ORCID ProfileMasahito Jimbo, View ORCID ProfileAnanda Sen, View ORCID ProfileSherri Sheinfeld Gorin
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.28.21266963
Diane M Harper
aDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
bDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
cDepartment of Women’s and Gender Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Diane M Harper
  • For correspondence: harperdi@med.umich.edu
Melissa Plegue
aDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Melissa Plegue
Masahito Jimbo
aDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
eDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Masahito Jimbo
Ananda Sen
aDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
dDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ananda Sen
Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
aDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction Using screen counts, women 50-64 yo have lower cancer screening rates for cervical and colorectal cancers compared to all other age ranges. The primary aim of this paper is to present cervical cancer and CRC screenings per woman and determine the predictors of being up-to-date for both.

Methods We used the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), an annual survey to guide health policy in the US, to explore the up-to-date status of dual cervical and colorectal cancer screening for women 50-64 yo. We categorized women into four mutually exclusive categories: up-to-date for dual screening, each single-screen, or neither screen. Multinomial multivariate regression modeling was used to evaluate the predictors of each category.

Results Among women ages 50-64 yo, dual screening was reported for 58.7% (57.6-59.9), cervical cancer screening alone (27.0% (25.9-28.1), CRC screening alone (5.3% (4.8-5.8), and neither screen (9% (8.4-9.6). Age, race, education, income, and chronic health conditions were significantly associated with dual screening compared to neither screen. Hispanic women compared to non-Hispanic White women were more likely to be up-to-date with cervical cancer screening than dual screening (aOR 1.38 (1.08, 1.77). By comparison to younger women, those 60-64 years are significantly more likely to be up-to-date with CRC screening than dual screening (aOR 1.75 (1.30, 2.34)).

Conclusions Screening received by each woman shows a much lower rate of dual screening than prior single cancer screening rates. Addressing dual screening strategies rather than single cancer screening programs for women 50-64 years may increase both cancer screening rates.

Graphical Abstract Screening rates differ by calculation approach. A better population metric for cancer prevention is to consider the screens each woman has received. Our data show much lower cervical cancer and CRC screening rates than a single screen calculation.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Tweet Women 50-64 years old lack dual cervical and colorectal cancer screening. Women who screen for only one cancer of the two, screen for cervical cancer almost five times more often than colorectal cancer.

Lay Summary Routine cervical and colorectal cancer (CRC) screenings can detect early, treatable, curable cancers. Using the responses to the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) we approached prevention by what the woman has received rather than by how many screens were done. We showed that women 50-64 years old were only up-to-date for both cervical and CRC screening 59% of the time, whereas, by traditional screening calculations, our data showed 86% of women were up-to-date for cervical cancer screening and 64% were up to date with CRC screening, irrespective of any other cancer screenings.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by NIH through the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research UL1TR002240 and by NCI through The University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center P30CA046592-29-S4 grants.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

BRFSS 2018 - https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2018.html

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • petrelim{at}med.umich.edu

  • mjimbo{at}med.umich.edu

  • anandas{at}umich.edu

  • ssgorin{at}med.umich.edu

  • Funding source: This work was supported by NIH through the Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research UL1TR002240 and by NCI through The University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center P30CA046592-29-S4 grants.

  • Conflicting and competing interests: none

  • Precis: Over half of women 50-64 years old have received both cervical and colorectal cancer screening, far from the HP2030 goals. The younger woman completes more cervical cancer screenings, and the older woman completes more CRC screenings.

Data Availability

BRFSS 2018 is a publically available database for anyone to access. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2018.html

https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/annual_2018.html

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 29, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
US women screen at lower rates for both cervical and colorectal cancers than a single cancer
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
US women screen at lower rates for both cervical and colorectal cancers than a single cancer
Diane M Harper, Melissa Plegue, Masahito Jimbo, Ananda Sen, Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
medRxiv 2021.11.28.21266963; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.28.21266963
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
US women screen at lower rates for both cervical and colorectal cancers than a single cancer
Diane M Harper, Melissa Plegue, Masahito Jimbo, Ananda Sen, Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
medRxiv 2021.11.28.21266963; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.28.21266963

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (161)
  • Allergy and Immunology (416)
  • Anesthesia (91)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (860)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (159)
  • Dermatology (97)
  • Emergency Medicine (250)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (394)
  • Epidemiology (8562)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (384)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1753)
  • Geriatric Medicine (167)
  • Health Economics (373)
  • Health Informatics (1244)
  • Health Policy (621)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (468)
  • Hematology (196)
  • HIV/AIDS (374)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10303)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (553)
  • Medical Education (192)
  • Medical Ethics (51)
  • Nephrology (212)
  • Neurology (1678)
  • Nursing (97)
  • Nutrition (251)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (326)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (451)
  • Oncology (929)
  • Ophthalmology (263)
  • Orthopedics (102)
  • Otolaryngology (172)
  • Pain Medicine (114)
  • Palliative Medicine (40)
  • Pathology (253)
  • Pediatrics (536)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (253)
  • Primary Care Research (208)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1770)
  • Public and Global Health (3841)
  • Radiology and Imaging (624)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (320)
  • Respiratory Medicine (520)
  • Rheumatology (208)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (168)
  • Sports Medicine (158)
  • Surgery (190)
  • Toxicology (36)
  • Transplantation (101)
  • Urology (76)