Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Serological responses to COVID-19 booster vaccine in England

Georgina Ireland, Heather Whitaker, Shamez N Ladhani, Frances Baawuah, Vani Subbarao, Ezra Linley, Lenesha Warrener, Michelle O’Brien, Corinne Whillock, Paul Moss, Mary E Ramsay, Gayatri Amirthalingam, Kevin E Brown
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.22.21266692
Georgina Ireland
1Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Georgina.ireland@phe.gov.uk
Heather Whitaker
2Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shamez N Ladhani
1Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
7Paediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St. George’s University of London, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Frances Baawuah
1Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
3Brondesbury Medical Centre, Kilburn, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vani Subbarao
1Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ezra Linley
4Sero-Epidemiology Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lenesha Warrener
5Virus Reference Department, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michelle O’Brien
3Brondesbury Medical Centre, Kilburn, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Corinne Whillock
1Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Moss
6Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary E Ramsay
1Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gayatri Amirthalingam
1Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin E Brown
1Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Introduction There are limited data on immune responses after COVID-19 vaccine boosters in individuals receiving primary immunisation with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) or AZD1222 (AstraZeneca).

Methods A prospective, cohort study to assess SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses before and after booster vaccination with BNT162b2 in adults receiving either (i) two BNT162b2 doses <30 days apart (BNT162b2-control), (ii) two BNT162b2 doses ≥30 days apart (BNT162b2-extended) or (iii) two AZD1222 doses ≥30 days apart (AZD1222-extended) in London, England. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody geometric mean titres (GMTs) before and 2-4 weeks after booster were compared.

Results Of 750 participants, 626 provided serum samples for up to 38 weeks after their second vaccine dose. Antibody GMTs peaked at 2-4 weeks after the second dose, before declining by 68% at 36-38 weeks after dose 2 for BNT162b2-control participants, 85% at 24-29 weeks for BNT162b2-extended participants and 78% at 24-29 weeks for AZD1222-extended participants. Antibody GMTs was highest in BNT162b2-extended participants (942 [95%CI, 797-1113]) than AZD1222-extended (183 [124-268]) participants at 24-29 weeks or BNT162b2-control participants at 36-38 weeks (208; 95%CI, 150-289). At 2-4 weeks after booster, GMTs were significantly higher than after primary vaccination in all three groups: 18,104 (95%CI, 13,911-23,560; n=47) in BNT162b2-control (76.3-fold), 13,980 (11,902-16,421; n=118) in BNT162b2-extended (15.9-fold) and 10,799 (8,510-13,704; n=43) in AZD1222-extended (57.2-fold) participants. BNT162b2-control participants (median:262 days) had a longer interval between primary and booster doses than BNT162b2-extended or AZD1222-extended (both median:186 days) participants.

Conclusions We observed rapid serological responses to boosting with BNT162b2, irrespective of vaccine type or schedule used for primary immunisation, with higher post-booster responses with longer interval between primary immunisation and boosting. Boosters will not only provide additional protection for those at highest risk of severe COVID-19 but also prevent infection and, therefore, interrupt transmission, thereby reducing infections rates in the population. Ongoing surveillance will be important for monitoring the duration of protection after the booster.

Competing Interest Statement

MER reports that the Immunisation and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Division (UK Health Security Agency) has provided vaccine manufacturers with post-marketing surveillance reports on pneumococcal and meningococcal infection, which the companies are required to submit to the UK licensing authority in compliance with their risk management strategy. A cost-recovery charge is made for these reports. EL report that the PHE Vaccine Evaluation Unit does contract research on behalf of GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, and Pfizer, which is outside the submitted work.

Funding Statement

This surveillance was funded by Public Health England (PHE) (now UK Health Security Agency).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The CONSENSUS study/audit was approved by the PHE/UKHSA R&D Research Ethics and Governance Group. No: NR0253

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • $ From Friday 1st October 2021, the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) became fully operational. UKHSA takes on the health protection responsibilities of Public Health England (PHE) and incorporates NHS Test & Trace and the Joint Biosecurity Centre (JBC). UKHSA is an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care. It is responsible for planning, preventing and responding to public health threats, and providing intellectual, scientific and operational leadership at national and local level, as well as on the global stage.

Data Availability

Applications for relevant anonymised data should be submitted to the UK Health Security Agency Office for Data Release.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accessing-public-health-england-data/about-the-phe-odr-and-accessing-data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 24, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Serological responses to COVID-19 booster vaccine in England
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Serological responses to COVID-19 booster vaccine in England
Georgina Ireland, Heather Whitaker, Shamez N Ladhani, Frances Baawuah, Vani Subbarao, Ezra Linley, Lenesha Warrener, Michelle O’Brien, Corinne Whillock, Paul Moss, Mary E Ramsay, Gayatri Amirthalingam, Kevin E Brown
medRxiv 2021.11.22.21266692; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.22.21266692
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Serological responses to COVID-19 booster vaccine in England
Georgina Ireland, Heather Whitaker, Shamez N Ladhani, Frances Baawuah, Vani Subbarao, Ezra Linley, Lenesha Warrener, Michelle O’Brien, Corinne Whillock, Paul Moss, Mary E Ramsay, Gayatri Amirthalingam, Kevin E Brown
medRxiv 2021.11.22.21266692; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.22.21266692

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (228)
  • Allergy and Immunology (504)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1240)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (206)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (531)
  • Epidemiology (10023)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (499)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2453)
  • Geriatric Medicine (238)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1644)
  • Health Policy (753)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (636)
  • Hematology (248)
  • HIV/AIDS (533)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11864)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (252)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (268)
  • Neurology (2281)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (352)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (454)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1245)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (730)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (313)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2281)
  • Public and Global Health (4834)
  • Radiology and Imaging (837)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (492)
  • Respiratory Medicine (651)
  • Rheumatology (285)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (238)
  • Sports Medicine (227)
  • Surgery (267)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (125)
  • Urology (99)