Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Glycated haemoglobin measurements from UK Biobank are different to those in linked primary care records: implications for combining biochemistry data from research studies and routine clinical care

View ORCID ProfileKatherine G Young, View ORCID ProfileTimothy J McDonald, Beverley M Shields
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.20.21266511
Katherine G Young
1Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Katherine G Young
  • For correspondence: k.young3@exeter.ac.uk
Timothy J McDonald
1Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
2Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Timothy J McDonald
Beverley M Shields
1Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Data linkage of cohort or RCT data with routinely collected data is becoming increasingly commonplace, and this often involves combining biomarker measurements from different sources. However, sources may have different biases due to differences in assay method and calibration. Combining these measurements, or diagnoses based on these measurements, is therefore not always valid. We highlight an example using glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test results from two different sources in UK Biobank data.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Research England's Expanding Excellence in England (E3) fund.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The North West Multi-centre Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval to UK Biobank (REC reference: 11/NW/03820).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Title has been updated ('HbA1c' replaced with 'Glycated haemoglobin')

Data Availability

UK Biobank data are available through a procedure described at http://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/using-the-resource/.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 17, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Glycated haemoglobin measurements from UK Biobank are different to those in linked primary care records: implications for combining biochemistry data from research studies and routine clinical care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Glycated haemoglobin measurements from UK Biobank are different to those in linked primary care records: implications for combining biochemistry data from research studies and routine clinical care
Katherine G Young, Timothy J McDonald, Beverley M Shields
medRxiv 2021.11.20.21266511; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.20.21266511
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Glycated haemoglobin measurements from UK Biobank are different to those in linked primary care records: implications for combining biochemistry data from research studies and routine clinical care
Katherine G Young, Timothy J McDonald, Beverley M Shields
medRxiv 2021.11.20.21266511; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.20.21266511

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (180)
  • Allergy and Immunology (434)
  • Anesthesia (99)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (949)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
  • Dermatology (111)
  • Emergency Medicine (260)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (423)
  • Epidemiology (9004)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (421)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1962)
  • Geriatric Medicine (191)
  • Health Economics (405)
  • Health Informatics (1330)
  • Health Policy (662)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (520)
  • Hematology (212)
  • HIV/AIDS (420)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10826)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (575)
  • Medical Education (200)
  • Medical Ethics (54)
  • Nephrology (222)
  • Neurology (1837)
  • Nursing (110)
  • Nutrition (274)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (356)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (470)
  • Oncology (1003)
  • Ophthalmology (299)
  • Orthopedics (111)
  • Otolaryngology (183)
  • Pain Medicine (126)
  • Palliative Medicine (44)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (582)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (276)
  • Primary Care Research (234)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1910)
  • Public and Global Health (4133)
  • Radiology and Imaging (676)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (370)
  • Respiratory Medicine (551)
  • Rheumatology (226)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (191)
  • Sports Medicine (178)
  • Surgery (207)
  • Toxicology (39)
  • Transplantation (109)
  • Urology (82)