A study protocol for community use of digital auscultation to improve diagnosis of paediatric pneumonia in Bangladesh

INTRODUCTION

Childhood pneumonia is one of the leading causes of death in children younger than five years globally¹ and accounts for an estimated 0.8 million deaths in children annually². The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that the African and the South-East Asian Regions contribute to more than 75% of total paediatric deaths from pneumonia³. It is estimated that the annual incidence of childhood pneumonia in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is 231 episodes per 1,000 children³. Pneumonia is also a significant cause of hospitalisation⁴, and about 16.4 million children in LMICs were hospitalised due to pneumonia in 2015³. A population-based study in Bangladesh estimated that the annual incidence of pneumonia was 360 episodes per 1,000 child-years, of which 7.3% were hospitalised⁵. The case-fatality rate of child pneumonia in Bangladesh is estimated to be 2-4% ^6,7.

The World Health Organization (WHO) and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) guidelines have been the foundation of pneumonia management in LMICs since mid-90s ^8,9. Per current IMCI guidelines, a child with fast breathing and/or chest indrawing without any danger sign is classified as non-severe pneumonia, and treated at home with oral antibiotics¹⁰. These guidelines have proven to be one of the most important childhood pneumonia interventions for LMICs to date, and up to 36% of the under-five-year-old mortality reductions in LMICs have been attributed to guideline implementation^11-15.

Despite its overall success, the IMCI algorithm can still be improved. Firstly, the guidelines were developed when access to vaccines was limited and child pneumonia mortality was high, so the guidelines intentionally prioritised sensitivity over specificity to ensure children with possible bacterial disease received antibiotics^8,10. Thus, the IMCI algorithm over-diagnoses many children with pneumonia who do not require antibiotics and they may have different treatable diseases^16,17. Secondly, the WHO guidelines do not include lung auscultation in their pneumonia definition for frontline healthcare workers despite lung auscultation serving as the cornerstone for pneumonia diagnosis in most ambulatory, well-resourced settings staffed by clinicians trained to perform lung auscultation ¹⁰. The exclusion of auscultation findings in these guidelines likely stems from its high inter-observer variability and subjectivity, regardless of the training level of healthcare providers, and the related difficulty in training healthcare workers to effectively use a conventional stethoscope^18-22. Traditional stethoscopes themselves are also limiting, attenuating higher frequency sounds, like wheezing and crackles, yet transmitting ambient noises and tubular resonance effects^20,23,24. Automated real-time classification of lung sounds or digital auscultation may overcome these limitations²⁵. Digital auscultation augmented by artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms has the potential to be a highly specific respiratory diagnostic tool feasible for use by first-level healthcare workers in LMICs. Operationally, the inclusion of adventitious sound classifications in current IMCI guidelines could help to reduce ²⁶ unnecessary use of antibiotics in LMICs.

A digital stethoscope can convert an acoustic sound to electronic signals, which can be further amplified for optimal listening. These electronic signals can then be processed and digitalised to transmit to a personal computer or a laptop²⁷. Automatic lung sound analysis, aiming to overcome the limitations of conventional auscultation, has been the recent focus of a significant amount of research, and some commercial systems are already available in the market^28,29.

The digital stethoscope has advantages over the analogue stethoscope in different stages of auscultation. An analogue stethoscope requires the proper placing of the diaphragm or bell in the correct positions of the human body to listen to internal body sounds. More modern digital stethoscopes do not necessarily require exact placement for two reasons. First, they convert the acoustic wave into electric signals and replace the double-sided chest piece (diaphragm and bell) with transducers to convert acoustic signals to electric signals. Second, the chest piece is packed with transducer arrays to achieve a uniform sensitivity over the entire active area. Together this design delivers a strong signal even when the chest piece is not placed in precisely the right position^{30 31}. This advantage is essential for minimally trained health care providers.

Conventional auscultation using an analogue stethoscope also requires a quiet environment, and ideally with the patient in a quiet, cooperative state, which is difficult in hospitals/clinics and especially hospitals/clinics in LMICs where the number of patients is typically usually higher than capacity. This often results in patient examination rooms filled with chattering people, ringing phones, and whirring fans; most importantly, the child being examined may then be agitated, uncooperative, and / or crying. Digital stethoscopes could improve listening capability through the use of noise cancelling technologies^32,33. Limitations of the human auditory system, which ranges from 20 Hz to 20 kHz for young adults and the range shrinks after middle-age³⁴, is also a drawback in conventional auscultation using a conventional stethoscope. A digital stethoscope can amplify sounds up to 100 fold³⁵. Much experience is required to interpret body sounds, and inter-rater variability is high regardless of healthcare providers’ training level²¹. Machine learning techniques can be used in digital auscultation to auto-analyse sounds²⁸ and produce a diagnosis or treatment decision²³. Johns Hopkins University and Sonavi Labs developed a novel digital stethoscope named Feelix Smart Stethoscope (Figure: 1)^30,31, which improves lung signal strength by uniformly distributing highly sensitive microphones in an array pattern across the stethoscope diaphragm to increase the sensitivity and provide broader frequency response, a critical feature for identifying higher frequency pathologic lung sounds. Its 3.7 V and 250 amps/hour rechargeable battery can power >20 hours of use, important in rural communities with unreliable electricity. The device mitigates movement artefact and tubular resonance by using an ergonomic design to better secure the device on the child’s chest. It also eliminates the rubber stethoscope tubing, a source of ambient noise and friction contamination. Notably, the device includes an integrated external-facing microphone that captures simultaneous environmental noise to the lung sound recording and removes the unwanted ambient noises through an adaptive spectral subtraction schema^24,36. The Feelix Smart Stethoscope also permits onboard data storage with a microSD card. The device turns on when the user picks up the device or touches the top of the device. The device turns off automatically after 60 seconds when it does not sense any touch. The device has three touch buttons – button-1 to start recording, button-2 to start a new session to record a new child’s four chest points recording, and button-3 to establish a Bluetooth connection with a mobile phone or tablet. It also has a slider to control sound volume level. In each session, the device automatically records 10 seconds for each four chest points of a child. The Feelix Smart Stethoscope has been successfully validated in the laboratory against six other commercially available electronic stethoscopes – including the Littmann 3200 electronic stethoscope and Thinklabs – and has demonstrated comparable results^37,38. Johns Hopkins and Sonavi Labs developed a machine-learning algorithm that can provide an automated classification of adventitious lung sounds. This Feelix Smart Stethoscope and the machine-learning algorithm will be used in this study.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Feelix Smart Stethoscope

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Study setting

This study will be implemented in the Projahnmo field site, a site for maternal, new-born, and child health research, which was established in 2001 in Sylhet district of Bangladesh by a partnership of Johns Hopkins University, the Bangladesh Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW), and several Bangladeshi institutions, including Non-Government Organisations (NGOs) and academia. A well-established routine community-based pregnancy, birth and under-five child surveillance system are being maintained by trained female community health workers (CHWs) in this site. The CHWs identify sick children during routine household visits and refer the children to the health facilities. They also educate carers of children about pneumonia signs and symptoms so that the carers can visit nearby community clinic (CC) without delay.

Bangladesh has established about 13,000 CCs, one each for ∼6,000 people³⁹. Each CC is staffed by a CHCP with at least 12^th grade education and three months of pre-service training, including IMCI guidelines. Each CHCP is responsible for providing primary health care for the population, including its catchment area’s children. Nine CCs will be purposively selected from the Projahnmo surveillance area (Zakiganj sub-district of Sylhet district of Bangladesh) (Figure: 2). CHCP of respective CC will screen all under-5 children while providing primary health care.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 2:

Study site

All CHW and CHCP will be trained and standardised to identify signs and symptoms of pneumonia according to WHO IMCI guidelines. A study physician will be recruited for providing training and supervision of CHCP and CHW in clinical assessments, measurement of peripheral oxyhaemoglobin saturation (SpO₂), and recording of lung sounds using the Smartscope. However, the study physician will not be directly involved in recording lung sound from the study participants.

Study design and procedure

Using a cross-sectional design, each CHCP will screen all children younger than five years visiting the community clinic. CHCP will obtain consent and record lung sounds of children who fulfilled the following criteria: history and/or observed cough, and/or history and/or observed difficult breathing, and a permanent resident of the Projahnmo site and did not enrol in the study within the past 30 days. CHCP will record sounds from four chest locations – two from the back and two from the front (Figure: 3). Each position will be recorded for approximately 10 seconds and the overall recording process will take about one minute. The recorded sound files will be then transferred to a password-protected server. The CHCP will also examine the child f or fast breathing by manually counting respirations and observe for abnormal breathing patterns such as lower chest wall indrawing, nasal flaring, head nodding, tracheal tugging, grunting, intercostal retractions, and stridor when calm. CHCP will measure the SpO₂ using a Masimo® Rad5 pulse oximeter, temperature using a digital thermometer, and anthropometry (weight, height and mid-arm circumference) using standard tools and techniques. The SpO₂ data will be used to classify pneumonia according to IMCI guidelines. If any child has a SpO₂ <90%, then referral to the sub-district health centre or Sylhet Osmani Medical College Hospital will be initiated. All enrolled children will be assessed after day-8 of enrolment by Projahnmo CHWs for treatment compliance and treatment outcome.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 3:

Sound recording positions

A total of 11 paediatricians will be trained to the methodology developed and validated during the Pneumonia Etiology Research for Child Health (PERCH) study⁴⁰. Only paediatricians successfully standardised to the methodology will serve as human listening panel members. Panellists will classify the recorded sound files of all four positions separately into five categories, e.g. (1) no wheeze and no crackles, (2) wheeze only (no crackles), (3) crackles only (no wheeze), (4) both wheeze and crackles or (5) uninterpretable. Two primary listeners will independently classify the recorded lung sounds, and any discrepancies will be arbitrated by the third listener (EDM). Johns Hopkins and Sonavi Labs developed a machine-learning algorithm; all sound files will also be classified the same categories using this algorithm and will be compared with human classification. Figure 4 depicts the study flow.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 4:

Study flow

DISCUSSION

This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of collecting quality lung sounds by frontline health workers and to examine the performance of the machine learning algorithm against a panel of human listeners for identifying adventitial lung sounds. To our knowledge this is the first study that will assess the recording of lung sounds of children younger than five years in first-level facilities by frontline workers in LMICs, where the burden of pneumonia and antibiotic use is high and diagnostic capacity is limited. The PERCH study enrolled children at a hospital setting and digital auscultation was performed by physicians, formally trained clinical assistants, or nurses ⁴⁰, another study enrolled children at a tertiary level centre in Lima, Peru⁴², and paediatricians recorded lung sounds in two tertiary level teaching hospitals in a study in Nepal⁴³. Recording lung sounds in a first-level facility poses unique challenges in that clinics are typically crowded and the environment can be chaotic and noisy. Furthermore, ill children younger than five years of age can be especially uncooperative in uncomfortable ambulatory settings, leading to unique challenges like agitation, crying, vocalizations, and the associated auscultation artifacts these create. Healthcare providers in ambulatory settings may lack the necessary time to calm the child and address these issues due to pressures from a high patient volume. If frontline health workers can effectively use digital auscultation in their typical clinical setting, then many false-positive pneumonia cases may be spared from treatment with antibiotics, which may reduce the cost of treatment as well as reduce the chance of developing antimicrobial resistance. A systematic analysis of 132 national surveys from 73 countries reported that on average, four of ten ill children below age five years in LMICs are treated with antibiotics⁴⁴. Recently, United Nations General Assembly announced that antimicrobial resistance is the most important and urgent threat globally⁴⁵.

One limitation of our study is that chest radiography will not be performed as it is not routinely available in first-level facilities in Bangladesh, and we will not compare radiographic imaging with lung sound classification. Instead, lung sound classifications will be compared with clinical findings among children meeting IMCI pneumonia to those who do not. Lack of a gold standard reference for pneumonia is well understood, and it is widely accepted that chest radiography itself lacks diagnostic accuracy for pneumonia⁴⁶. For example, it was found that many children with IMCI defined clinical pneumonia (age-specific tachypnoea) had normal chest radiographs⁴⁷ and may have normal lung sounds and may not require antibiotics. In this study we will utilize the paediatrician listening panel as our gold standard reference as previously described⁴⁰. We have shown that lung sound classifications of digital auscultation recordings generated using a listening panel approach has strong associations with radiographic findings and also mortality outcomes⁴⁸.

Future work ranges from additionally refining this device, based on lessons learned from the use of the device at the first level facility during this study, as well as phase 1 and 2 clinical trials that prospectively integrate the digital auscultation into the WHO pneumonia management pathway to evaluate patient outcomes after digital auscultation-based decision-making. Eventually, if these preliminary studies are successful, a large multi-country clinical trial could be designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of digital auscultation to improve pneumonia management.

Authors contributions

EDM, SA and AHB conceptualised and designed this study. AHB, EDM, HN, SC provided mentorship to SA. HC, AS and DKM critically review the study design. JN and DKM reviewed the sample size estimation and analysis plan. EDM will provide training to the human listening panel and IM will analyse the recorded sound files using a machine learning algorithm. NHC and NB will be responsible for data management and AI will manage the field implementation of this study. SA drafted the manuscripts and all authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript before submission.

Funding

This research was funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (Global Health Research Unit on Respiratory Health (RESPIRE); 16/136/109) using UK aid from the UK Government to support global health research. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the UK Government. The RESPIRE collaboration comprises the UK Grant holders, Partners and research teams as listed on the RESPIRE website (www.ed.ac.uk/usher/respire).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.