Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Field Testing of a Decision Support Tool for Acute Appendicitis using an Online Randomized Experimental Design

View ORCID ProfileJoshua E. Rosen, David R. Flum, Giana H. Davidson, Joshua M. Liao
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.09.21265975
Joshua E. Rosen
1Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
2Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
3Decision Science Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joshua E. Rosen
  • For correspondence: jerosen@uw.edu
David R. Flum
1Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
2Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
3Decision Science Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Giana H. Davidson
1Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
2Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua M. Liao
3Decision Science Group, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
4Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background Mounting evidence from randomized controlled trials have shown that antibiotics can be a safe and effective treatment for appendicitis. Patients and surgeons must work together to choose the optimal treatment approach for each patient based on their own preferences and values. We developed a novel decision support tool (DST) to facilitate shared decision making for appendicitis. The effect of this DST on decisional outcomes remains unknown.

Methods We conducted an online randomized field test in at-risk individuals comparing the DST to a standard infographic as a control. Individuals were randomized 3:1 to the DST (intervention) or infographic (control). The primary outcome was the total decisional conflict scale (DCS) score measured before and after exposure to the DST. Secondary outcomes included between-group DCS scores, and between group comparisons of the acceptability of DST or infographic.

Results 180 individuals were included in the study after quality control checks. Total DCS scores decreased significantly after viewing the DST (59.0 to 14.6, p<0.001) representing movement from a state of high to low decisional conflict. Individuals exposed to the DST reported higher acceptability ratings (3.7 vs. 3.3, p<0.001) and had more individuals who would completely agreed that they would be willing to try antibiotics (45% vs. 21%, p=0.008).

Conclusions The novel appendicitis DST significantly decreased decisional conflict in this online randomized field test. Users rated the tool as highly acceptable and expressed increased willingness to consider antibiotics as a treatment approach after viewing it.

Study Funding This work was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [grant number T32DK070555]; and a generous gift from Marty and Linda Ellison. The development of aspects of the decision support tool was funded by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The funding sources had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to submit for publication.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [grant number T32DK070555]; and a generous gift from Marty and Linda Ellison. The development of aspects of the decision support tool was funded by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The funding sources had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript or in the decision to submit for publication.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

IRB of The University of Washington waived ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 09, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Field Testing of a Decision Support Tool for Acute Appendicitis using an Online Randomized Experimental Design
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Field Testing of a Decision Support Tool for Acute Appendicitis using an Online Randomized Experimental Design
Joshua E. Rosen, David R. Flum, Giana H. Davidson, Joshua M. Liao
medRxiv 2021.11.09.21265975; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.09.21265975
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Field Testing of a Decision Support Tool for Acute Appendicitis using an Online Randomized Experimental Design
Joshua E. Rosen, David R. Flum, Giana H. Davidson, Joshua M. Liao
medRxiv 2021.11.09.21265975; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.09.21265975

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Surgery
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (230)
  • Allergy and Immunology (507)
  • Anesthesia (111)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1256)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (207)
  • Dermatology (148)
  • Emergency Medicine (283)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (537)
  • Epidemiology (10047)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (500)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2482)
  • Geriatric Medicine (239)
  • Health Economics (482)
  • Health Informatics (1652)
  • Health Policy (756)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (638)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (536)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11888)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (626)
  • Medical Education (255)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (269)
  • Neurology (2301)
  • Nursing (140)
  • Nutrition (354)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (458)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1257)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (326)
  • Pediatrics (737)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2294)
  • Public and Global Health (4850)
  • Radiology and Imaging (846)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (493)
  • Respiratory Medicine (654)
  • Rheumatology (288)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (228)
  • Surgery (271)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (130)
  • Urology (100)