Abstract
Introduction During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, maternity care has been substantially altered to reduce transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Many antenatal services are now restricted or delivered online, and visiting has been restricted during labour and in the postnatal period.
Methods We conducted an online survey from 1st August to 31st December 2020 to investigate the experiences of women who were pregnant or breastfeeding in the UK during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The survey included 55 open and closed questions and required 5 minutes to complete. We publicised the survey using social media.
Results We received 96 responses, including 66 currently pregnant women and 22 women who were pregnant during the pandemic. The response rate was 70.1% of survey views. We found mixed experiences of the impact of the pandemic on antenatal and perinatal care, notably with some women feeling visiting restrictions were insufficient and others feeling they were too strict. Twenty-nine women received no information about COVID-19, and 6 women found it very difficult to find information. Thirty-nine women would have liked to have more information about breastfeeding after a pregnancy affected by COVID-19, and 37 women wanted more information about antibody persistence and transfer.
Discussion Additional support is required for pregnant and lactating women during the current pandemic. Provision of information and support, including via social media, may improve women’s experiences of pregnancy in the current environment.
Significance Maternity services in the UK have been significantly restructured to prevent transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including restrictions to in-person antenatal care, and perinatal visiting. It is not fully known how these changes are perceived by pregnant and breastfeeding women.
Reactions to changes in antenatal care are mixed, including whether restrictions were too lenient or too strict. Most women underwent online antenatal care in addition in-person visits. Some received no information about COVID-19, and a significant proportion of women would have liked more information, particularly regarding antibody transfer and benefits of breastfeeding during the pandemic.
Ethical statement This study was approved by North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The periCOVID study received funding from Action Medical Research.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
NHS Health Research Authority North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding: This study was funded by Action Medical Research.
Conflicts of interest/competing interests: all authors declare no conflict of interest
Ethics approval: This study was approved by North East - Newcastle & North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee
Consent to participate: Not applicable
Consent for publication: Not applicable
Availability of data and material: Not applicable
Code availability: Not applicable
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
