Determinants and Magnitude of Neonatal Sepsis at Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized University Hospital, Harar, Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Introduction

Sepsis is a systemic inflammatory reaction syndrome that occurs as a result of a suspected or confirmed infection. A dysregulated host response to infection causes a life-threatening organ failure. It’s also a prevalent last pathway to death from numerous infectious diseases around the world. ^1-3 Neonatal sepsis is a serious blood bacterial infection in neonates at the age of equal to or less than 28 days of life, and it’s still the major significant cause of death and long-term morbidity in developing countries.^{4, 5}

Globally, an estimated 1.3 to 3.9 million annual neonatal sepsis cases and 400 000 to 700 000 annual deaths worldwide. About 6,700 newborns die every day.⁶ Among hospital-born infants, hospital-acquired infections account for an estimated 4% to 56% of all deaths in the neonatal period. Among these, 84% of deaths are preventable.^{5, 7}

Developing countries accounted for around 85.0 % of sepsis and deaths worldwide. Annually, an estimate of 5.29 to 8.73 million DALYs are lost due to neonatal sepsis in SSA countries.^{8, 9} The neonatal mortality rate in Ethiopia was 33 deaths per 1000 live births and the major causes of death in neonates are neonatal infections.^10-12 Studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia from 2015 – 2019 showed that the magnitude of neonatal sepsis ranged from 33.8-78% (33.8% in Wolayita, 64.8% in Gondar, 76.8% in Mekele, 77.8% in Shashamane, and 78.3% in Arba Minch). ^13-17 The main significant factors associated with neonatal sepsis were maternal factors, (meconium stained amniotic fluid ^{18, 19}, UTI during pregnancy ^{12, 14, 15, 18, 19}, Place of delivery ^{14, 15, 20}, Antenatal follow up ^{19, 20}, and PROM ^{12, 15, 17, 20, 21}) and neonatal factors (birth weight ^{12, 17, 18}, and APGAR score ^{17, 19, 21}).

As indicated by many studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia, the magnitude of neonatal sepsis varies geographically. Thus, there is a need to perform periodic assessment of the problem in each location. In addition, in order to achieve the SDG goal of reducing neonatal mortality in Ethiopia, identifying factors contributing to neonatal sepsis is of paramount importance. There have been no studies in the research area that have investigated the magnitude and variables related with newborn sepsis to our knowledge. Thus, the prevalence of newborn sepsis and the factors that contribute to it have been investigated in this study among neonates admitted to the NICU at Hiwot Fana Comprehensive Specialized University Hospital.

Method and Materials

Result

Prevalence of Neonatal Sepsis Among Hospital Admitted Neonates

Out of the total 386 admitted neonates, 205 (53.1%) of them had neonatal sepsis (Figure 1). Among these, the majority, 139 (67.8%) of them had early onset neonatal sepsis and the rest had late onset of neonatal sepsis. Among the neonates who had sepsis, 122 (59.5%) were males, while 83 (40.5%) were females.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Prevalence of neonatal sepsis among neonates admitted in NICU at HFCSUH, Harar, Eastern Ethiopia, 2017-2019.

Discussion

In our findings, the prevalence of neonatal sepsis was 53.1%. Other similar studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia indicated a higher prevalence of neonatal sepsis, 78.3% in Arba Minch.¹⁷, 77.9% in Shashamane¹⁶, 76.8% in Mekelle¹⁵, 64.8% in Gondar.¹⁴ The reason for the low prevalence of neonatal sepsis in our finding compared to the above studies could be due to difference in population variation and due to the fact that our study was conducted in a specialized university referral hospital which has relatively better facilities and human resources. On the contrary, our study finding was higher than the finding reported from Wolaita Sodo, 33.8%¹³, These differences might be due to sociodemographic variation and sample size differences.

In our study, the prevalence of neonatal sepsis was higher among males than females 31.6%. This finding was consistent with studies conducted in Bahar Dar, Gondar and Arba Minch, 64%²², 41.1%¹⁴, and 58.2%¹⁷, respectively.

The prevalence of neonatal sepsis in this study was found to be higher, 49% among early neonates (0-7 days). A similar finding was also reported from other studies in West Showa, Arba Minch, Bahar Dar, Gondar, and Wolaita Sodo, which reported 94.9%²⁰, 84%¹⁷, 72.9%²², 48.2%¹⁴, and 40.4%¹³, respectively.

In our finding, preterm neonates were 8 times more likely to develop neonatal sepsis than post term neonates. This is consistent with study conducted in Debre Markos where preterm neonates were found to be 6 times more likely to develop neonatal sepsis. In addition, other studies also reported similar findings.^{21, 23, 24}

Our study revealed that the odds of neonatal sepsis was 5 times higher among neonates born with low birth weight. This is consistent with studies conducted in different parts of Ethiopia, in Durame, Arsi, Arba Minch, Jimma, and Gondar. ^{12, 17, 18, 24, 25} According to our study, neonates with birth asphyxia was 4 times more likely to develop neonatal sepsis than those who had no birth asphyxia. This is consistent with a study conducted in Shashamane.¹⁶

In our study, neonates born from mothers who had ANC follow up were 68% less likely to develop neonatal sepsis than those neonates whose mothers had not ANC follow up. This result was consistent with study conducted in west Shewa, Oromia Region.²⁰

Our study revealed that, neonates born from mothers who had a history of UTI were 3 times more likely to develop neonatal sepsis than neonates born from mothers who had no history of UTI. This finding was consistent with similar studies conducted in Ethiopia; in Durame¹⁸, Gondar¹⁴ and Mekelle.¹⁵

Our study findings indicated that neonates who were born by SVD and Cesarian section were found to be 95.3% and 95% less likely to get neonatal sepsis than children born by instrumental delivery, respectively. This finding was contradictory to the finding reported in Gondar, which reported that neonates born by cesarian section were more likely to develop neonatal sepsis than neonates born by SVD and instrumental delivery.²⁵ This difference could be due to a difference in population and sample size variation.

In our study, neonates born of mothers who had a duration of rupture membrane < 12 hours and 12 – 17 hours were 89% and 79% less likely to have neonatal sepsis than those neonates born of mothers with a duration of rupture of membrane > 18 hours. Similar findings were also reported from studies in Arba Minch¹⁷ and Debre Markos, Ethiopia²¹.

In our study, neonates born from mothers who had a history of antibiotic use were 61% less likely to have neonatal sepsis than those born from mothers who had no history of antibiotic use. Similarly, neonates born from mothers who lived in urban areas were 74% less likely to have neonatal sepsis than neonates born from mothers living in rural areas. These two factors were the only variables which had a significant association with neonatal sepsis and which were not reported in other similar studies.

Conclusion

Overall, the magnitude of neonatal sepsis was high and it was more prevalent among male neonates. Among neonatal factors; being preterm, low birth weight and having birth asphyxia were found to significantly increase the odds of neonatal sepsis. Among maternal factors; urban residence, having ANC follow up, give birth by SVD and CS, history of antibiotic use and having rupture of membrane < 18 hours were found to significantly decrease the odds of neonatal sepsis.

Provision of neonatal and obstetrics care as per standard during in pre, intra and postnatal period. Training of health professionals on infection prevention and safe delivery practice should be provided.

Limitation of the study

The research was conducted using secondary data, which is difficult to generalize to the general population. The study used a cross-sectional study design. Therefore, there is a temporal issue.

Disclosure