Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Distilling a High Precision Drug Adverse Effect Benchmark Using Wikipedia’s Wisdom of the Crowd

Yonatan Bilu, View ORCID ProfileChen Yanover
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.01.21265741
Yonatan Bilu
1KI Research Institute, Kfar Malal, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yonatan@kinstitute.org.il chen@kinstitute.org.il
Chen Yanover
1KI Research Institute, Kfar Malal, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Chen Yanover
  • For correspondence: yonatan@kinstitute.org.il chen@kinstitute.org.il
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Large datasets of relational medical data, such as the adverse effects of drugs or vaccines, typically attain their large size, by relying on automatic, or semi-automatic, methods for generation. This often comes with a compromise on the precision of the generated data, which can be at least partially alleviated by having experts curate the data.

Aim Since having experts review a large dataset can be costly and time consuming, here we suggest using Wikipedia for this task – that is, augment the automatic generation step by an automatic curation step based on the expert knowledge accumulated in Wikipedia.

Methods To curate a dataset of adverse drug effects (ADEs), we suggest retrieving the Wikipedia page associated with the drug, and checking whether the ADE appears in the sections describing adverse effects. Drug indications, typically described in the opening paragraph of the page, are similarly filtered out.

Results We use the method to curate two large adverse drug effect datasets and show that the obtained datasets have a much higher precision relative to their originating ones.

Conclusions Algorithms which aim to infer drug-ADE relations, should at the very least be able to identify the “clear cut” cases. The high-precision benchmark constructed herein may therefore be a valuable resource for the evaluation of such algorithms.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any external funding.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available as supplementary materials.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 21, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Distilling a High Precision Drug Adverse Effect Benchmark Using Wikipedia’s Wisdom of the Crowd
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Distilling a High Precision Drug Adverse Effect Benchmark Using Wikipedia’s Wisdom of the Crowd
Yonatan Bilu, Chen Yanover
medRxiv 2021.11.01.21265741; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.01.21265741
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Distilling a High Precision Drug Adverse Effect Benchmark Using Wikipedia’s Wisdom of the Crowd
Yonatan Bilu, Chen Yanover
medRxiv 2021.11.01.21265741; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.11.01.21265741

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Informatics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (215)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1093)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (195)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (499)
  • Epidemiology (9757)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (480)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2303)
  • Geriatric Medicine (222)
  • Health Economics (462)
  • Health Informatics (1553)
  • Health Policy (732)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (602)
  • Hematology (236)
  • HIV/AIDS (501)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11631)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (616)
  • Medical Education (236)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (256)
  • Neurology (2139)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (335)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (426)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (517)
  • Oncology (1172)
  • Ophthalmology (363)
  • Orthopedics (128)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (145)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (309)
  • Pediatrics (694)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (298)
  • Primary Care Research (265)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2172)
  • Public and Global Health (4645)
  • Radiology and Imaging (775)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (455)
  • Respiratory Medicine (623)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (225)
  • Sports Medicine (208)
  • Surgery (250)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)