Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Predictors of COVID testing among Australian youth: Insights from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children

Md Irteja Islam, Verity Chadwick, Alexandra Martiniuk
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.31.21265627
Md Irteja Islam
1Maternal and Child Health Division, International Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), 68, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh
2Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building, A27 Fisher Road, NSW 2006, Australia
3Centre for Health Research and School of Business, The University of Southern Queensland, West Street, Darling Heights, QLD 4350, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: irteja.islam@icddrb.org
Verity Chadwick
4Royal North Shore Hospital, Reserve Rd, St Leonard’s NSW 2065, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexandra Martiniuk
2Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Edward Ford Building, A27 Fisher Road, NSW 2006, Australia
5Office of the Chief Scientist, The George Institute for Global Health, Level 5/1 King Street, Newtown NSW 2042, Australia
6Dalla Lana School of Public Health, The University of Toronto, 155 College St Room 500, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background Testing has played a crucial role in reducing the spread of COVID. Although COVID symptoms tend to be less severe in children and adolescents, a key concern is young people’s role in the transmission of the virus given their highly social lifestyles. In this study, we aimed to identify the predictors associated with COVID testing in Australian youth using data from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC).

Methods We used the latest wave 9C1 of the LSAC, where data were collected from 16–21-year-old Australians via an online survey between October and December 2021. In total, 2291 Australian youths responded to the questions about COVID testing and COVID symptom severity. Data was stratified by living with/without parents, and bivariate and logistic regression analyses examined predictor variables (age, sex, country of birth, remoteness, education level, employment, relationship status, number of household members, living with parents, receiving the COVID financial supplement from government and index of relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage) and their distributions over the outcome variable COVID testing.

Results Youths aged 16-17 were more likely to live at home than youths aged 20-21 years. The strongest predictor of COVID testing was living in major cities (regardless of living with or without parents). Changed household composition was significantly associated with COVID testing among the youths living in the parental home. While among the respondents living without their parents, living with multiple household members and low or no cohesion among household members was associated with higher rates of COVID testing.

Conclusion Our study revealed young people have been very good at getting tested for COVID. To further incentivise testing in this age group, we should consider providing this age group with continued financial and social support while awaiting the outcome of the test and during any isolation.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • Large national cohort of young people strengthened the findings of the study and allowing us to examine the factors associated with COVID testing for the first time in Australia.

  • A broad-based assessment of potential predictors of COVID testing, including sociodemographic and coronavirus specific factor.

  • Cross-sectional observational design limits causal inference.

  • Self-reported information about COVID testing can be subject to recall as well as social desirability bias.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The LSAC has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Australian Institute of Family Studies (AIFS) (Application number 20-09), and written informed consent was obtained for all study participants. In addition, the authorship team obtained permission from Australian Data Archive Dataverse to use LSAC data for research and publications (Reference No. 263493).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The LSAC dataset is publicly available from the National Centre for Longitudinal Data (NCLD) Dataverse on request available at https://growingupinaustralia.gov.au/data-and-documentation/accessing-lsac-data.

https://growingupinaustralia.gov.au/data-and-documentation/accessing-lsac-data

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted November 01, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Predictors of COVID testing among Australian youth: Insights from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Predictors of COVID testing among Australian youth: Insights from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children
Md Irteja Islam, Verity Chadwick, Alexandra Martiniuk
medRxiv 2021.10.31.21265627; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.31.21265627
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Predictors of COVID testing among Australian youth: Insights from the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children
Md Irteja Islam, Verity Chadwick, Alexandra Martiniuk
medRxiv 2021.10.31.21265627; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.31.21265627

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (174)
  • Allergy and Immunology (419)
  • Anesthesia (97)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (894)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (166)
  • Dermatology (101)
  • Emergency Medicine (257)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (404)
  • Epidemiology (8744)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (403)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1844)
  • Geriatric Medicine (175)
  • Health Economics (386)
  • Health Informatics (1281)
  • Health Policy (642)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (488)
  • Hematology (206)
  • HIV/AIDS (387)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10519)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (564)
  • Medical Education (193)
  • Medical Ethics (52)
  • Nephrology (216)
  • Neurology (1744)
  • Nursing (100)
  • Nutrition (264)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (342)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (457)
  • Oncology (959)
  • Ophthalmology (279)
  • Orthopedics (107)
  • Otolaryngology (174)
  • Pain Medicine (117)
  • Palliative Medicine (41)
  • Pathology (262)
  • Pediatrics (553)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (264)
  • Primary Care Research (218)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1836)
  • Public and Global Health (3962)
  • Radiology and Imaging (649)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (340)
  • Respiratory Medicine (532)
  • Rheumatology (214)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (178)
  • Sports Medicine (165)
  • Surgery (196)
  • Toxicology (37)
  • Transplantation (105)
  • Urology (78)