ABSTRACT
Current design of serological tests employs conservative immunoassay approaches and is often focused on convenience, speed of manufacturing, and affordability. Limitations of such serological tests include semi-quantitative measurements, lack of standardization, potential cross-reactivity, and inability to distinguish between antibody subclasses. As a result of cross- reactivity, diagnostic specificity of serological antibody tests may not be sufficiently high to enable screening of the general asymptomatic populations for the acquired immunity against low-prevalence infectious diseases, such as COVID-19. Likewise, lack of a single standard for assay calibration limits inter-laboratory and international standardization of serological tests. In this study, we hypothesize that combination of immunoaffinity enrichments with targeted mass spectrometry measurements would enable rational design of serology diagnostics of infectious diseases, such as COVID-19. The same instrumental platform allows for sensitive and specific measurements of viral protein antigens, as wells as anti-viral antibodies circulating in human serum. Our proof-of-concept immunoprecipitation - parallel reaction monitoring (IP-PRM) assays quantified NCAP_SARS2 protein with a limit of detection of 313 pg/mL in serum. In addition, a multiplex IP-selected reaction monitoring (IP-SRM) assay facilitated differential quantification of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody isotypes and subclasses in patient sera. Simultaneous evaluation of numerous antigen-antibody subclass combinations revealed a receptor-binding domain (RBD)-IgG1 as a combination with the highest diagnostic specificity and sensitivity. Anti-RBD IgG1, IgG3, IgM and IgA1 subclasses, but not IgG2, IgG4 and IgA2, were found elevated in COVID-19-positive sera. Synthetic heavy isotope-labeled peptide internal standards as calibrators revealed elevated anti-RBD IgG1 in positive (510-6700 ng/mL; 0.02-0.22% of total serum IgG1) versus negative sera (60 [interquartile range 41-81] ng/mL). Likewise, anti-RBD IgM was elevated in positive (190-510 ng/mL; 0.06-0.16% of total serum IgM) versus negative sera (76 [31-108] ng/mL). Further validation of immunoprecipitation-targeted proteomics assays as a platform for serological assays will facilitate standardization and improvement of the existing serological tests, enable rational design of novel tests, and offer tools for comprehensive investigation of antibody isotype and subclass cooperation in immunity response.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research COVID-19 Immunity Task Force grant (#VR2-173207) and Alberta Innovates National Partnered R&I Initiatives (#202100452) to A.P.D. Z. F. acknowledges the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21806018) and Globalink Early Career Fellowship (Mitacs, Canada and China Scholarship Council, China; 201806065018).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics committee of University of Alberta gave ethical approval for this work (#Pro00104098).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
