Seroconversion rate and socioeconomic and ethnic risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection in children in a population-based cohort

Main text

Introduction

The rate of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children has been discussed controversially during the first months of the pandemic. Children are frequently oligo- or asymptomatic and, therefore, have been undertested and underdiagnosed. Seroconversion studies, however, reveal that the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infections in adults and children are similar [1].

Most infections probably take place in households where contacts are most intense [2]. Cramped living conditions and poverty have been associated with a higher rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection both in adults and children as well as increased morbidity and mortality [3,4]. Ethnic origin has also been described as a risk factor for hospitalization for COVID19 in children in the US [5,6]. Moreover, socioeconomic factors have been identified as risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection [3,7].

This study in an unselected asymptomatic paediatric population in a Western German metropolitan region with about 40% of families with migration background had been set up to identify risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection in children and adolescents.

Methods

Results

Discussion

This large population-based study identifies seroconversion rates and risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infections in asymptomatic children and adolescents, attended legally required preventive examinations. Our key findings are:

• less than half of seropositive participants of all age groups did recall symptoms of infection suggesting that more than half of SARS-CoV-2 infections go unnoticed [9].

• the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections is significantly higher in families of Turkish or Middle Eastern decent independent of other risk factors i.e. after adjustment for other socioeconomic confounders.

Our cohort had increasing seroprevalence rates from 0.5% in Mid-2020 to almost 6% in the beginning of 2021 like other seroprevalence data from German or Swiss school cohorts [10,11]. The dynamics in increase of seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections matches well with national data of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection in the same geographic region [2,12]. As shown before [2] infection rates have been comparable across all age groups in keeping with the findings of other authors [1,6].

It is not surprising, that the known exposure to SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals doubled the risk for seroconversion. In most families, at least one parent also has evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, which is slightly more than described in other cohorts [13,14]. However, 50% of these SARS-CoV-2 exposed children did not develop evidence of infection.

Recent study from the US state that socioeconomically disadvantaged children, especially those from ethnic minorities, are at higher risk of infection [3,5,6]. Adult data from the UK and the US also show increased morbidity and mortality from SARS-CoV-2 in adults from ethnic minorities and with poor socioeconomic status. [4,7]. Limited access to healthcare systems and migration background might also play a role in spreading the disease [15,16].

The most relevant risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection in our study population is a Turkish or Middle Eastern migration background. Although socioeconomic factors confound the factor of migration history to some extent, our findings result from an adjusted regression model and are therefore independent of educational standard and housing conditions.

Reasons for this observation could include different family and social structures favouring closer contacts and therefore increasing the risk of transmission as described in a tight knit Jewish Orthodox community in the US by Gaskell et al. [17]. Apart from that, language as well as cultural barriers might play a role [7]. Visiting friends and relatives in countries with higher incidence of infection might also further increase the risk. Scepticism regarding politics and health authorities are an additional issue, especially in prevention and vaccination programs [1]. To approach these families, tailored, culture sensitive strategies need to be developed and can serve as a blueprint for vaccination programs.

Limitations: Paediatric patients were recruited only from three regions (counties) in Western Germany and not all paediatric practices in the area participated. In addition, initially low seroprevalence rates could have introduced a bias. Genetic risk factors could predispose certain populations to infections with SARS-CoV-2, which was not considered in this study. The proportion of children from Turkish families, in contrast to those of other origins, was lower than expected at 9% (see table 1), whereas ca. 20% of the families in the regions studied are of Turkish origin. However, this rather indicates an underestimation of the true infection rate in this group. Another limitation might be the use of surrogate parameters for the assessment of living conditions and income like number of rooms etc. Different educational grades might have posed difficulties in answering questions about educational status and might have also led to an underestimation of the corresponding risk factor. We attempted to reduce a possible bias through semi structured interviews to validate the answers drawn from the internet-based questionnaire.

Conclusions

This study shows that poor socioeconomic status and Turkish or Middle Eastern migration background are independent risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection in a population-based cohort of children and adolescents in Germany.

Targeted interventions and tailored prevention strategies in these groups are necessary to improve infection control and to protect these vulnerable populations from excess morbidity and mortality. They could serve as a blueprint for vaccination programs and there is need to shift the focus of politics accordingly.

Back to top