Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Clinical characteristics of pregnant women infected with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China: a nationwide case-control study

View ORCID ProfileQin Li, Lian Chen, Hai Jiang, Danni Zheng, Yuanyuan Wang, Jie Mei, Xudong Ma, Yuan Wei, Yangyu Zhao, Jie Qiao
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.21.21265313
Qin Li
1National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecology, National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Obstetrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Qin Li
Lian Chen
1National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecology, National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Obstetrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hai Jiang
1National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecology, National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Obstetrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Danni Zheng
1National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecology, National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Obstetrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuanyuan Wang
1National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecology, National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Obstetrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jie Mei
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sichuan Province People’s Hospital, Chengdu, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xudong Ma
3National Health Commission of the People’s Republic China, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuan Wei
1National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecology, National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Obstetrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yangyu Zhao
1National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecology, National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Obstetrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jie Qiao
1National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrical and Gynecology, National Center for Healthcare Quality Management in Obstetrics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jie.qiao@263.net
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To formally compare the clinical course of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnant women with their nonpregnant counterparts.

METHODS Clinical data of pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19 in the designated hospitals of mainland China were retrieved up to April 12, 2020 through an epidemic reporting system maintained at the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic China. Each pregnant patient was randomly matched to a nonpregnant woman with confirmed COVID-19 in the same hospital as control, then their clinical courses were formally compared.

RESULTS 138 pregnant women had been identified as confirmed COVID-19 cases. Among them, 17 severe cases and 1 maternal death were recorded, which was less than their nonpregnant peers (23 severe cases and 3 death). 57.2% had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the third trimester, including 13 severe cases and 1 maternal death. 7.3% of pregnant patients had diarrhea and 3.6% had nausea or vomiting, compared with related proportion as 15.2% (OR: 0.38, 95%CI: 0.15, 0.96) and 10.1% (OR: 0.25, 95%CI: 0.07, 0.89) in nonpregnant patients. Pregnant patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in early pregnancy presented similar laboratory tests with their nonpregnant peers, however, with pregnancy progresses, increased inflammation, coagulation and hepatic injury markers happened more and more frequently (p<0.001) in pregnant patients.

CONCLUSIONS Being pregnant did not represent a risk for severe condition when compared with their nonpregnant peers. Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in early pregnancy were even at lower risk of severe illness than those infected in late pregnancy.

What are the novel findings of this work?Compared with non-pregnant COVID-19 patients, pregnant patients tend to present less symptom, had unique laboratory findings, and tend to at lower risk of COVID-19–related death. Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the early pregnancy tend to be in the less severe condition of illness than those infected in late pregnancy.

What are the clinical implications of this work?Vital comparisons of the clinical course upon COVID-19 between pregnant and nonpregnant women in childbearing age are, unfortunately, lacking. Through formally comparisons between the two groups, the present study provides more reliable evidence towards the management of pregnant women with COVID-19.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study was funded by Chinese Academy of Engineering (2020-KYGG-01-06), National Natural Science Foundation of China (72042013), Peking University Health Science Center (BMU2020HKYZX001).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics committee of Peking University Third Hospital gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 23, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical characteristics of pregnant women infected with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China: a nationwide case-control study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Clinical characteristics of pregnant women infected with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China: a nationwide case-control study
Qin Li, Lian Chen, Hai Jiang, Danni Zheng, Yuanyuan Wang, Jie Mei, Xudong Ma, Yuan Wei, Yangyu Zhao, Jie Qiao
medRxiv 2021.10.21.21265313; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.21.21265313
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Clinical characteristics of pregnant women infected with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China: a nationwide case-control study
Qin Li, Lian Chen, Hai Jiang, Danni Zheng, Yuanyuan Wang, Jie Mei, Xudong Ma, Yuan Wei, Yangyu Zhao, Jie Qiao
medRxiv 2021.10.21.21265313; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.21.21265313

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (227)
  • Allergy and Immunology (500)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1230)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (205)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (529)
  • Epidemiology (10005)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (497)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2445)
  • Geriatric Medicine (236)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1635)
  • Health Policy (751)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (633)
  • Hematology (248)
  • HIV/AIDS (531)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11855)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (625)
  • Medical Education (251)
  • Medical Ethics (74)
  • Nephrology (267)
  • Neurology (2273)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (350)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (452)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (532)
  • Oncology (1244)
  • Ophthalmology (375)
  • Orthopedics (133)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (154)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (729)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (311)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2280)
  • Public and Global Health (4824)
  • Radiology and Imaging (833)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (488)
  • Respiratory Medicine (650)
  • Rheumatology (283)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (237)
  • Sports Medicine (225)
  • Surgery (266)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (124)
  • Urology (99)