Abstract
Background Genetic variants within the APOE locus may modulate Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk independently or in conjunction with APOE*2/3/4 genotypes. Identifying such variants and mechanisms would importantly advance our understanding of APOE pathophysiology and provide critical guidance for AD therapies aimed at APOE. The APOE locus however remains relatively poorly understood in AD, owing to multiple challenges that include its complex linkage structure and uncertainty in APOE*2/3/4 genotype quality. Here, we present a novel APOE*2/3/4 filtering approach and showcase its relevance on AD risk association analyses for the rs439401 variant, which is located 1,801 base pairs downstream of APOE and has been associated with a potential regulatory effect on APOE.
Methods We used thirty-two AD-related cohorts, with genetic data from various high-density single- nucleotide polymorphism microarrays, whole-genome sequencing, and whole-exome sequencing. Study participants were filtered to be ages 60 and older, non-Hispanic, of European ancestry, and diagnosed as cognitively normal or AD (n=65,701). Primary analyses investigated AD risk in APOE*4/4 carriers. Additional supporting analyses were performed in APOE*3/4 and 3/3 strata. Outcomes were compared under two different APOE*2/3/4 filtering approaches
Results Using more conventional APOE*2/3/4 filtering criteria (approach 1), we showed that, when in- phase with APOE*4, rs439401 was variably associated with protective effects on AD case-control status. However, when applying a novel filter that increases certainty of the APOE*2/3/4 genotypes by applying more stringent criteria for concordance between the provided APOE genotype and imputed APOE genotype (approach 2), we observed that all significant effects were lost.
Conclusions We showed that careful consideration of APOE genotype and appropriate sample filtering were crucial to robustly interrogate the role of the APOE locus on AD risk. Our study presents a novel APOE filtering approach and provides important guidelines for research into the APOE locus, as well as for elucidating genetic interaction effects with APOE*2/3/4.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for this study was provided by the The Iqbal Farrukh & Asad Jamal Fund, the NIH (AG060747 and AG047366, granted to M.D.G, AG066206 and AG066515, granted to Z.H), the European Union′s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie (grant agreement No. 890650, granted to Y.L.G.), and the Alzheimer's Association (AARF-20-683984, granted to M.E.B).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Participants or their caregivers provided written informed consents in the original studies. The current study protocol was granted an exemption by the Stanford Institutional Review Board because the analyses were carried out on de-identified, off-the-shelf data.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data used in the discovery analyses are available upon application to: - dbGaP (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap/) - NIAGADS (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap/) - LONI (https://ida.loni.usc.edu/) - Synapse (https://www.synapse.org/) - Rush (https://www.radc.rush.edu/) - NACC (https://naccdata.org/) The specific data repository and identifier for each cohort is indicated in Table S1 of the supplement. Because of ethical and legal restrictions, the Rotterdam, EADI, and EADB cohort data are available only upon request. Interested authors may respectively contact Dr. Ikram, at m.a.ikram{at}erasmusmc.nl, and Dr. Lambert, at jean-charles.lambert{at}pasteur-lille.fr.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap/
